Journal of the House
________________
FRIDAY, APRIL 22, 2005
At nine o'clock and thirty minutes in the forenoon the Speaker called the House to order.
Devotional Exercises
Devotional exercises were conducted William Wick, Chaplain of Norwich University, Northfield.
Committee Bill Introduced
H. 528
Rep. Sweaney of Windsor, for the committee on Government Operations, introduced a bill, entitled
An act relating to adjustments to the municipal employees’ retirement system of Vermont;
Which was read the first time and, under the rule, placed on the Calendar for notice tomorrow.
Joint Resolution Referred to Committee
J.R.H. 35
Reps. Parent of St. Albans City, Hube of Londonderry, Allard of St. Albans Town, Brennan of Colchester, LaVoie of Swanton and Winters of Swanton offered a joint resolution, entitled
Joint resolution requesting the agency of natural resources’ wastewater division to investigate the sewage pipe leaks in Burlington
Whereas, on Monday, April 4, 2005, a 50-year‑old underwater cast-iron sewer pipe, which serves much of Burlington’s New North End, sprung the first of two leaks that a week later had resulted in the dumping of millions of gallons of untreated waste into the Winooski River which flows into Lake Champlain, and
Whereas, Burlington city officials discovered the first leak two days following its occurrence when the flow to the treatment plant dropped off, and
Whereas, finally, five days later, trained divers had patched this first leak, but a second leak emerged the next day, Sunday, and
Whereas, although many methods to bypass temporarily these leaks exist, none were ever put in place, and
Whereas, the reason given for not installing a bypass was that the high water would dilute the contaminant, and
Whereas, on Tuesday, April 12, divers attempted a second try at patching the original leak before resuming work on the second leak, and
Whereas, while scientists at the University of Vermont foresaw no danger to the city of Burlington’s drinking water, which is drawn from the lake at a point several miles south of the river’s mouth and then treated, the spill does mean more phosphorous, the primary pollutant of concern to those who monitor the lake’s health, pouring into the lake, and
Whereas, once the waste flows into the lake its natural flow is northward toward St. Albans Bay and ultimately the already phosphorous‑scarred Missisquoi Bay, and
Whereas, this leak took place just as the governor’s clean and clear program to improve the water quality of the lake is being implemented, and
Whereas, the city has not been responsive to the leaks by taking immediate and aggressive action upon learning of their existence, and the underlying causes require further examination, and
Whereas, a thorough state investigation of these spills that determines whether any civil penalties are warranted and ways to avoid a similar recurrence in the city of Burlington are in order, and
Whereas, although any immediate danger to the city’s population has been avoided, the condition of the sewer line starkly raises the necessity of assuring that every measure to prevent a recurrence of these leaks is taken, now therefore be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives:
That the General Assembly requests the agency of natural resources’ wastewater division to investigate thoroughly the causes of this leak to determine if any state financial penalties are warranted and what preventive measures are required to minimize the likelihood of a similar sewage pipe leak of this magnitude occurring again in the city of Burlington, and be it further
Resolved: That the secretary of natural resources submit a report of the division’s findings as to the causes of the leak and recommendations for future preventive measures to the House Committee on Fish, Wildlife, and Water Resources and to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy on or before November 1, 2005, and be it further
Resolved: That the secretary of state be directed to send a copy of this resolution to Tom Torti, secretary of Natural Resources.
Which was read and, in the Speaker’s discretion, treated as a bill and referred to the committee on Fish, Wildlife and Water Resources.
Joint Resolution Adopted in Concurrence
J.R.S. 28
Joint resolution, entitled
Joint resolution relating to weekend adjournment;
By Senator Welch,
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives:
That when the two Houses adjourn on Friday, April 22, 2005, it be to meet again no later than Tuesday, April 26, 2005.
Was taken up read and adopted in concurrence.
Consideration Interrupted by Recess
S. 52
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to renewable energy portfolio standards, appliance efficiency standards and distributed electricity;
Was taken up, and pending third reading of the bill, Rep. Flory of Pittsford moved to amend the House proposal of amendment as follows:
First: in Sec. 2, 30 V.S.A. § 8002, by adding a new subdivision (9) to read:
(9) “Retail electricity provider” means a company engaged in the distribution or sale of electricity directly to the public or to be used ultimately by the public for any combination of lighting, heating, and power.
Second: in Sec. 4, 30 V.S.A. § 8005(b), by striking subdivision (6) and inserting the following:
(6) make available to Vermont retail electricity providers for purchase, on a pro rata basis, a specified portion of the power generated under subdivisions (2) and (3) of this subsection. A retail electricity provider that chooses not to purchase a pro rata share of power generated under subdivision (3) of this section, must establish, to the satisfaction of the board, that the purchase would impair the provider’s ability to meet the public’s need for energy services after safety concerns are addressed, at the lowest present value life cycle cost, including environmental and economic costs;
Which was agreed to.
Pending third reading of the bill, Reps. Flory of Pittsford and Sunderland of Rutland Town moved to amend the House proposal of amendment as follows:
In Sec. 4, 30 V.S.A. § 8005(b), by striking subdivision (7) in its entirety and inserting the following:
(7) Establish a way to give retail electricity providers appropriate credit, in meeting any portfolio standard implemented under the provisions of section 8004 of this title, for resources developed through the SPEED program;
Pending the question, Shall the House proposal of amendment be amended as offered by Reps. Flory of Pittsford and Sunderland of Rutland Town?
Recess
At ten o’clock and twenty minutes in the forenoon, the Speaker declared a recess until the fall of the gavel.
At eleven o’clock and fifteen minutes in the forenoon, the Speaker called the House to order.
Consideration Resumed; Third Reading; Bill Passed in Concurrence
With Proposals of Amendment
S. 52
Consideration resumed on Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to renewable energy portfolio standards, appliance efficiency standards and distributed electricity;
The recurring question, Shall the House proposal of amendment be amended as offered by Reps. Flory of Pittsford and Sunderland of Rutland Town? Rep. Flory of Pittsford demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House proposal of amendment be amended as offered by Reps. Flory of Pittsford and Sunderland of Rutland Town? was decided in the negative. Yeas, 37. Nays, 95.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
DePoy of Rutland City
Donaghy of Poultney
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Flory of Pittsford
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kennedy of Chelsea
Kilmartin of Newport City
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Lawrence of Lyndon
Marcotte of Coventry
Marron of Stowe
McAllister of Highgate
Metzger of Milton
Morley of Barton
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Niquette of Colchester
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Schiavone of Shelburne
Smith of New Haven
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Those who voted in the negative are:
Ancel of Calais
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of S. Burlington
Barnard of Richmond
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Branagan of Georgia
Brooks of Montpelier
Canfield of Fair Haven
Chen of Mendon
Clarkson of Woodstock
Condon of Colchester
Copeland-Hanzas of Bradford
Corcoran of Bennington
Cross of Winooski
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donahue of Northfield
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Dowland of Holland
Edwards of Brattleboro
Emmons of Springfield
Errecart of Shelburne
Evans of Essex
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
Frank of Underhill
French of Randolph
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Green of Berlin
Haas of Rochester
Head of S. Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hosford of Waitsfield
Howard of Rutland City
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hunt of Essex
Hutchinson of Randolph
Jerman of Essex
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Kainen of Hartford
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Komline of Dorset
Krawczyk of Bennington
Kupersmith of S. Burlington
Larson of Burlington
Leriche of Hardwick
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Malcolm of Pawlet
Marek of Newfane
Martin of Springfield
Martin of Wolcott
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McFaun of Barre Town
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Miller of Elmore
Minter of Waterbury
Molloy of Arlington
Mook of Bennington
Nease of Johnson
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Orr of Charlotte
Otterman of Topsham
Partridge of Windham
Pellett of Chester
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Potter of Clarendon
Pugh of S. Burlington
Reese of Pomfret
Rodgers of Glover
Rusten of Halifax
Seibert of Norwich
Severance of Colchester
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Shaw of Derby
Sweaney of Windsor
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Wright of Burlington
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Adams of Hartland
Brennan of Colchester
Helm of Castleton
Keogh of Burlington
Koch of Barre Town
Livingston of Manchester
Lorber of Burlington
Louras of Rutland City
Monti of Barre City
Nitka of Ludlow
O'Donnell of Vernon
Randall of Troy
Smith of Morristown
Valliere of Barre City
Westman of Cambridge
Wood of Brandon
Young of Orwell
Pending third reading of the bill, Rep. Errecart of Shelburne moved to amend the House proposal of amendment as follows:
First: in Sec. 3, 30 V.S.A. § 8004(f), after the word "Before" by inserting the following: "December 30, 2007 and again before" and in subdivision (f)(1) by striking the number "2008" and inserting the following: "the end of the year that precedes the date on which the report is due"
Second: in Sec. 3, 30 V.S.A. § 8004(f)(5), by striking the words "rates effects" and inserting the following: "effects on rates, economic development and jobs,"
Which was agreed to.
Pending third reading of the bill, Reps. Dunsmore of Georgia and Clark of Vergennes moved to amend the House proposal of amendment as follows:
In Sec. 6, 30 V.S.A. §209(d)(4), after “as defined by section 281c of this title.”, by inserting “The department of public service is directed to study and make recommendations on the feasibility of establishing grant programs for new renewable generation systems on farms.”
Which was agreed to.
Thereupon the bill was read the third time.
Pending the question, Shall the bill pass in concurrence with proposals of amendment? Rep. Klein of East Montpelier demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the bill pass in concurrence with proposals of amendment? was decided in the affirmative. Yeas, 94. Nays, 35.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Ancel of Calais
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Barnard of Richmond
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Branagan of Georgia
Brooks of Montpelier
Canfield of Fair Haven
Chen of Mendon
Clark of Vergennes
Clarkson of Woodstock
Condon of Colchester
Copeland-Hanzas of Bradford
Corcoran of Bennington
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donahue of Northfield
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Dowland of Holland
Dunsmore of Georgia
Edwards of Brattleboro
Emmons of Springfield
Errecart of Shelburne
Evans of Essex
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
Frank of Underhill
French of Randolph
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Green of Berlin
Haas of Rochester
Head of S. Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hosford of Waitsfield
Howard of Rutland City
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hunt of Essex
Hutchinson of Randolph
Jerman of Essex
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Kainen of Hartford
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Komline of Dorset
Krawczyk of Bennington
Kupersmith of S. Burlington
Larson of Burlington
Leriche of Hardwick
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Malcolm of Pawlet
Marek of Newfane
Marron of Stowe
Martin of Springfield
Martin of Wolcott
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Miller of Elmore
Minter of Waterbury
Molloy of Arlington
Mook of Bennington
Nease of Johnson
Niquette of Colchester
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Orr of Charlotte
Partridge of Windham
Pellett of Chester
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Potter of Clarendon
Pugh of S. Burlington
Reese of Pomfret
Rusten of Halifax
Seibert of Norwich
Severance of Colchester
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Smith of New Haven
Sweaney of Windsor
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Wright of Burlington
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Clark of St. Johnsbury
DePoy of Rutland City
Donaghy of Poultney
Endres of Milton
Flory of Pittsford
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kennedy of Chelsea
Kilmartin of Newport City
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Lawrence of Lyndon
Marcotte of Coventry
Metzger of Milton
Morley of Barton
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Rodgers of Glover
Schiavone of Shelburne
Shaw of Derby
Smith of Morristown
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Adams of Hartland
Audette of S. Burlington
Brennan of Colchester
Cross of Winooski
Helm of Castleton
Keogh of Burlington
Koch of Barre Town
Livingston of Manchester
Lorber of Burlington
Louras of Rutland City
McAllister of Highgate
McFaun of Barre Town
Monti of Barre City
Nitka of Ludlow
O'Donnell of Vernon
Randall of Troy
Valliere of Barre City
Westman of Cambridge
Wood of Brandon
Young of Orwell
Clark of Vergennes explained his vote as follows:
“Madam Speaker:
There are several aspects of this bill I oppose such as the speed program the micro-managing of the utility providers and the fear of higher utility rates for my constituents, but in the spirit of cooperation and compromise, I offer my support to the bill.”
Rep. Flory of Pittsford explained her vote as follows:
“Madam Speaker:
I appreciate the work and cooperation of the committee on this bill. However, I can’t quite get to the point of being concerned that this is necessary and won’t result in increased costs to my constituents. I only wish I had more time to reassure myself.”
Rep. Kilmartin of Newport City explained his vote as follows:
“Madam Speaker:
Of making us a David against Goliath, it pretends we are a Goliath in the energy market. I read the Bible, I know how the story ends. Goliath loses. David wins.
I vote no because this bill is an illusion. It is a “get richer quicker” scheme for certain Vermont energy developers while defying the economic and natural recourse reality of Vermont. It increases our competitive disadvantage. It erroneously claims we have the internal resources to create energy to replace Vermont Yankee and Hydro-Quebec. It gives “The Emperor’s New Clothes”, new meaning with its irrational nonsensical and unreal definition of renewable energy resources. Above all it defies the free market and insures higher energy costs to Vermont instead.”
Morley of Barton explained his vote as follows:
“Madam Speaker:
I voted no because I believe this bill will increase rates to all Vermonters. S. 52 will have an impact on every single person in the state of Vermont. I, Rep. John Morley IV, would like to apologize to all the ratepayers of the state, the businesses, commercial establishments the residential ratepayers and especially the low-income Vermonters that can’t afford higher rates. I am sorry.”
Rep. Smith of New Haven explained his vote as follows:
“Madam Speaker:
As a supporter of clean renewable instate energy production I support this bill with the stated objectives of lowering our electric rates and bills, stimulate Vermont’s economy, provide direct benefits to Vermont businesses and making our air cleaner and reducing greenhouse gasses.”
Message from the Senate No. 52
A message was received from the Senate by Mr. Marshall, its Assistant Secretary, as follows:
Madam Speaker:
I am directed to inform the House that the Senate has on its part passed Senate bill of the following title:
S. 41. An act relating to unemployment compensation for survivors of domestic violence.
In the passage of which the concurrence of the House is requested.
The Senate has considered House proposal of amendment to Senate bill of the following title:
S. 84. An act relating to comprehensive management of exposure to mercury.
And has concurred therein.
The Senate has considered a bill originating in the House of the following title:
H. 93. An act relating to the Middletown Springs, Ira, Poultney, Tinmouth and Wells town lines.
H. 341. An act relating to transient noncommunity public water systems.
And has passed the same in concurrence.
The Senate has considered bills originating in the Houses of the following titles:
H. 198. An act relating to gift certificates.
H. 479. An act relating to Vermont entities’ compliance with federal law.
And has passed the same in concurrence with proposals of amendment in the adoption of which the concurrence of the House is requested.
The Senate has considered a joint resolution originating in the House of the following title:
J.R.H. 34. Joint resolution relating to the use of the State House for the Green Mountain Boy’s State Program.
And has adopted the same in concurrence.
The Senate has on its part adopted Senate concurrent resolutions of the following titles:
S.C.R. 29. Senate concurrent resolution congratulating the People’s Health and Wellness Clinic on the occasion of its tenth anniversary.
S.C.R. 30. Senate concurrent resolution congratulating Dale Wells on his selection as the Northeast Kingdom Chamber of Commerce’s Citizen of the Year.
The Senate has on its part adopted concurrent resolutions originating in the House of the following titles:
H.C.R. 100. House concurrent resolution congratulating the St. Johnsbury Town Band on the occasion of its 175th anniversary.
H.C.R. 101. House concurrent resolution honoring Gary Rosen for his outstanding work in the performing arts.
H.C.R. 102. House concurrent resolution congratulating Taylor Coppenrath of West Barnet on the conclusion of his historic basketball career as a University of Vermont catamount.
H.C.R. 103. House concurrent resolution honoring University of Vermont basketball coach Tom Brennan.
At twelve o’clock and thirty minutes in the afternoon, on motion of Rep. Sunderland of Rutland Town, the House adjourned until Tuesday, April 26, 2005, at ten o’clock in the forenoon, pursuant to the provisions of J.R.S. 28.
Concurrent Resolutions Adopted
The following concurrent resolutions, having been placed on the Consent Calendar on the preceding legislative day, and no member having requested floor consideration as provided by the Joint Rules of the Senate and House of Representatives, are hereby adopted in concurrence.
H.C.R. 100
House concurrent resolution congratulating the St. Johnsbury Town Band on the occasion of its 175th anniversary
H.C.R. 101
House concurrent resolution honoring Gary Rosen for his outstanding work in the performing arts
H.C.R. 102
House concurrent resolution congratulating Taylor Coppenrath of West Barnet on the conclusion of his historic basketball career as a University of Vermont Catamount
H.C.R. 103
House concurrent resolution honoring University of Vermont basketball coach Tom Brennan
S.C.R. 29
Senate concurrent resolution congratulating the People's Health and Wellness Clinic on the occasion of its tenth anniversary.
S.C.R. 30
Senate concurrent resolution congratulating Dale Wells on his selection as the Northeast Kingdom Chamber of Commerce’s Citizen of the Year.
[The full text of the concurrent resolutions appeared in the Senate and House Calendar Addendum on the preceding legislative day and will appear in the volume of the Public Acts and Resolves of the 2005 Biennial session of the sixty-eighth biennial session]