Journal of the House
________________
FRIDAY, MAY 14, 2004
At nine o'clock and thirty minutes in the forenoon the Speaker called the House to order.
Devotional Exercises
Devotional exercises were conducted by Speaker Walter Freed of Dorset.
Pages Honored
In appreciation of their many services to the members of the General Assembly, the Speaker recognized the following named Pages who are completing their service today and presented them with commemorative pins:
Taylor Bates of Williston
Garrett Bauman of Castleton
Henry Cesari of Chelsea
Andrea Fagnant of Morrisville
Azalea Frank of Montpelier
Kendra LaBounty of Richmond
Hannah McMeekin of Randolph
Lukas Petersen of Burlington
Molly Taylor of Bethel
Genna Williams of Shaftsbury
House Resolutions Placed on Calendar
The Speaker placed before the House the following resolutions which were read and in the Speaker’s discretion, placed on the Calendar for action tomorrow under Rule 52.
H.R. 37
House resolution urging the province of Quebec to complete construction of highway 35 between the Vermont-Quebec border and Iberville, Quebec
Offered by: Representatives LaVoie of Swanton, Winters of Swanton, Allard of St. Albans Town, Bolduc of Barton, Branagan of Georgia, Dunsmore of Georgia, Howrigan of Fairfield, Keenan of St. Albans City, Parent of St. Albans City, Perry of Richford, Starr of Troy, Trombley of Grand Isle and Waite of Pawlet
Whereas, it is important for the purposes of regional economic development that a safe, fast, and completed highway link exist between the cities of Boston and Montreal, and
Whereas, it is in the common economic interest of both the state of Vermont and the province of Quebec that, in the event of a terrorist attack, there exist a border crossing for the passage of goods and individuals other than the crossing at Lacolle, Quebec, and
Whereas, the highway link between Boston and Montreal is primarily a limited access highway, and
Whereas, the Vermont segment of the highway, designated as Interstate 89, is complete, and the state of Vermont has assumed the responsibility for maintaining this road, and
Whereas, the segment of the Boston to Montreal highway located between the international border at Swanton, Vermont and Iberville, Quebec is a dangerous three‑lane road designated as R-133, and
Whereas, R-133 has been the site of many automobile accidents involving Americans and some of these have involved fatalities, and
Whereas, from Iberville north to the city of Montreal there exists a limited access highway designated as highway 35 that is safe and fast, and
Whereas, it is imperative for reasons of economic development and motorists’ personal safety that highway 35 be completed from the international border at Swanton to Iberville, and
Whereas, the province of Quebec must recognize the urgency of completing highway 35, now therefore be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives:
That this legislative body urges Jean Rioux, a member of the Quebec National Assembly representing Iberville riding to continue his effort to secure the necessary funding for the completion of highway 35, and be it further
Resolved: That the Clerk of the House be directed to send a copy of this resolution to Quebec Premier Jean Charest in Quebec City.
H.R. 38
House resolution congratulating Representative Doran Metzger of Milton on the occasion of his engagement to U.S. Army Captain Elaine Young
Offered by: Representatives Peaslee of Guildhall, DePoy of Rutland City, Rogers of Castleton, Endres of Milton, Wright of Burlington, Adams of Hartland, Allaire of Rutland City, Allard of St. Albans Town, Amidon of Charlotte, Anderson of Woodstock, Aswad of Burlington, Atkins of Winooski, Audette of South Burlington, Bailey of Hyde Park, Baker of West Rutland, Bartlett of Dover, Bohi of Hartford, Bolduc of Barton, Bostic of St. Johnsbury, Botzow of Pownal, Branagan of Georgia, Brennan of Colchester, Brooks of Montpelier, Brown of Walden, Carey of Chester, Chen of Mendon, Clark of St. Johnsbury, Clark of Vergennes, Connell of Warren, Corcoran of Bennington, Crawford of Burke, Cross of Winooski, Crowley of West Rutland, Dakin of Colchester, Darrow of Dummerston, Deen of Westminster, Donaghy of Poultney, Donahue of Northfield, Donovan of Burlington, Dostis of Waterbury, Duffy of Rutland City, Dunsmore of Georgia, Edwards of Brattleboro, Emmons of Springfield, Errecart of Shelburne, Fallar of Tinmouth, Fisher of Lincoln, Flory of Pittsford, Freed of Dorset, French of Randolph, Haas of Rutland City, Hall of Newport City, Head of South Burlington, Heath of Westford, Helm of Castleton, Hingtgen of Burlington, Houston of Ferrisburgh, Howrigan of Fairfield, Hube of Londonderry, Hummel of Underhill, Jewett of Ripton, Johnson of South Hero, Johnson of Canaan, Kainen of Hartford, Keenan of St. Albans City, Kennedy of Chelsea, Kenyon of Bradford, Keogh of Burlington, Ketchum of Bethel, Kilmartin of Newport City, Kirker of Essex, Kiss of Burlington, Kitzmiller of Montpelier, Klein of East Montpelier, Koch of Barre Town, Krawczyk, A. of Bennington, Krawczyk, J. of Bennington, Larocque of Barnet, Larrabee of Danville, Larson of Burlington, LaVoie of Swanton, Lippert of Hinesburg, Livingston of Manchester, Maier of Middlebury, Marek of Newfane, Marron of Stowe, Martin of Springfield, Masland of Thetford, Mazur of South Burlington, McAllister of Highgate, McCullough of Williston, McLaughlin of Royalton, Milkey of Brattleboro, Miller of Shaftsbury, Miller of Elmore, Molloy of Arlington, Monti of Barre City, Morrissey of Bennington, Myers of Essex, Nease of Johnson, Nitka of Ludlow, Nuovo of Middlebury, Obuchowski of Rockingham, O’Donnell of Vernon, Otterman of Topsham, Parent of St. Albans City, Partridge of Windham, Perry of Richford, Peterson of Williston, Pillsbury of Brattleboro, Pugh of South Burlington, Robinson of Richmond, Rodgers of Glover, Rusten of Halifax, Schiavone of Shelburne, Seibert of Norwich, Shand of Weathersfield, Sharpe of Bristol, Shaw of Derby, Sheltra of Derby, Shouldice of Calais, Smith of New Haven, Smith of Morristown, Starr of Troy, Sunderland of Rutland Town, Sweaney of Windsor, Sweeney of Colchester, Sweetser of Essex, Symington of Jericho, Towne of Berlin, Tracy of Burlington, Trombley of Grand Isle, Valliere of Barre City, Vincent of Waterbury, Waite of Pawlet, Westman of Cambridge, Winters of Swanton, Winters of Williamstown, Wood of Brandon, Young of Orwell and Zuckerman of Burlington
Whereas, marriage is the most significant journey that a man and woman in love can embark on during their lives, and
Whereas, when one partner proposes to the other that they become engaged, it is frequently the most private of events, and
Whereas, despite this tradition, on occasion, a proposal of marriage may occur at a public gathering, and
Whereas, while no historian can verify the following for certain, it is extremely unlikely that while the House of Representatives was sitting, that the well of the House has previously served as the setting for a proposal of marriage, and
Whereas, the romantic passion of the member from Milton, and Vermont Army National Guard helicopter pilot and lieutenant, Representative Doran Metzger, established a probable historic precedent when, during the announcement period preceding the Orders of the Day on May 7, 2004, he stood before his colleagues, and introduced his girlfriend, U.S. Army Captain Elaine Young of Owensboro, KY, the deputy chief of the pharmacy at Ft. Knox, KY, and
Whereas, relating his promise not to refer to her as “captain or doctor during announcements,” he declared in the alternative, “So Mr. Speaker, I am going to ask her to let me refer to her as my fiancée,” and
Whereas, the member from Milton then proceeded to the Senate seats where he bent down on one knee formally to seek Elaine Young’s hand in matrimony presenting a diamond ring to seal their engagement, and
Whereas, Captain Young, who Representative Metzger met while they were both in military training in Texas, consented to be his wife, to his relief and the cheering approval of his legislative colleagues, and
Whereas, in answer to the pending question before the House: Can an airborne helicopter pilot find true happiness with a pharmacist whose two feet are firmly planted on the ground, the ayes appear to have it, the ayes do have it, and the House unanimously votes in the affirmative, now therefore be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives:
That the members of this legislative body congratulate their colleague Representative Doran Metzger of Milton on the occasion of his engagement to U.S. Army Captain Elaine Young, and be it further
Resolved: That the Clerk of the House be directed to send a copy of this resolution to Representative Doran Metzger of Milton.
Joint Resolution Adopted in Concurrence
J.R.S. 66
Joint resolution, entitled
Joint resolution relating to weekend adjournment;
By Senator Welch,
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives:
That when the two Houses adjourn on Friday, May 14, 2004, it be to meet again no later than Tuesday, May 18, 2004.
Was taken up read and adopted in concurrence.
Committee of Conference Appointed
S. 311
Pursuant to the request of the Senate for a Committee of Conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to making miscellaneous changes in Statutes affecting the Vermont agency of transportation;
The Speaker appointed as members of the Committee of Conference on the part of the House:
Rep. Peaslee of Guildhall
Rep. Emmons of Springfield
Rep. Winters of Swanton
Committee Not Relieved of Consideration
S. 164
Rep. Nease of Johnson moved that the Committee on Natural Resources and Energy be relieved of further consideration of Senate bill entitled
An act relating to liability for genetic engineering;
Pending the question, Shall the committee on Natural Resources and Energy be relieved of the bill? Rep. Partridge of Windham demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the committee on Natural Resources and Energy be relieved of the bill? was decided in the negative. Yeas, 60. Nays, 68.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Amidon of Charlotte
Anderson of Woodstock
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Chen of Mendon
Connell of Warren
Cross of Winooski
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donahue of Northfield
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Emmons of Springfield
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hingtgen of Burlington
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hummel of Underhill
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Kenyon of Bradford
Keogh of Burlington
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Molloy of Arlington
Nease of Johnson
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Perry of Richford
Pugh of South Burlington
Rodgers of Glover
Rusten of Halifax
Seibert of Norwich
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Shouldice of Calais
Smith of Morristown
Sweaney of Windsor
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Vincent of Waterbury
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Brown of Walden
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Corcoran of Bennington
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
DePoy of Rutland City
Donaghy of Poultney
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Errecart of Shelburne
Flory of Pittsford
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
Marron of Stowe
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Miller of Elmore
Monti of Barre City
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Nitka of Ludlow
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Peaslee of Guildhall
Peterson of Williston
Robinson of Richmond
Schiavone of Shelburne
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Starr of Troy
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Webster of Randolph
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Adams of Hartland
Carey of Chester
Dakin of Colchester
Edwards of Brattleboro
Endres of Milton
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Hunt of Essex
Kainen of Hartford
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kirker of Essex
Larson of Burlington
Metzger of Milton
Parent of St. Albans City
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Reese of Pomfret
Rogers of Castleton
Severance of Colchester
Trombley of Grand Isle
Waite of Pawlet
Young of Orwell
Rep. Howrigan of Fairfield explained his vote as follows:
“Mr. Speaker:
I voted yes because in this home and house of democracy the people have the right to know two voices of discussion. To silence voices by the use of a pin on a plaster wall is highly similar to a coffin.”
Third Reading; Bill Passed in Concurrence
With Proposal of Amendment
S. 76
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to the medical use of marijuana;
Was taken up, read the third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment.
Rules Suspended; Bill Read Second Time;
Consideration Interrupted by Recess
S. 249
Rep. Valliere of Barre City, for the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, to which had been referred Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to facilitating the use of wastewater disposal systems located in clay soils and near ledges;
Reported in favor of its passage in concurrence with proposal of amendment as follows:
By striking all after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Sec. 1. 10 V.S.A. § 1972(9) is amended to read:
(9) “Subdivide” means to divide land by sale, gift, lease, mortgage foreclosure, court-ordered partition, or filing of a plat, plan, or deed in the town records where the act of division creates one or more lots of less than 10 acres in area. Subdivision shall be deemed to have occurred on the conveyance of the first lot or the filing of a plat, plan, or deed in the town records, whichever first occurs. A subdivision of land shall also be deemed to have taken place when a lot is divided by a state or municipal highway, road, or right-of-way, or when a lot is divided by surface waters with a drainage area of greater than ten square miles.
Sec. 2. 10 V.S.A. § 1974(h) is added to read:
(h) Notwithstanding other provisions of law to the contrary, no permit shall be required under this chapter for any of the actions listed in section 1973 of this title, if those actions pertain to only one single family home on its own lot of 10 acres or more in area.
The bill, having appeared on the Calendar one day for notice, was taken up and read the second time.
Pending the question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy?
Recess
At ten o’clock and thirty-five minutes in the forenoon, the Speaker declared a recess until the fall of the gavel.
At one o’clock and twenty minutes in the afternoon, the Speaker called the House to order.
Consideration Resumed; Proposal of Amendment Agreed
to and Third Reading Ordered
S. 249
Consideration resumed on Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to facilitating the use of wastewater disposal systems located in clay soils and near ledges;
Pending the recurring question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy? Rep. Fallar of Tinmouth moved to substitute an amendment for that offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as follows:
By adding two new sections to read:
Sec. 3. Sec. 1. Sec. 15(m) of No. 133 of the Acts of the 2001 Adj. Sess. (2002) is amended to read:
Sec. 15. TRANSITION AND IMPLEMENTATION
* * *
(m) Municipal ordinances and bylaws. Between the effective date of this act and July 1, 2007, a municipality may adopt or amend a sewage ordinance or those provisions of a zoning bylaw that regulate potable water supplies and wastewater systems, only if:
(1) as adopted or amended, it contains
technical standards no more stringent than the state standards that
meet or exceed the minimum state standards, including wastewater system siting
and design, in effect on
January 1, 2002; or
(2) as adopted or amended, it contains technical standards consistent with or more stringent than those adopted under this act, except that a municipality may choose to limit, preclude, or otherwise regulate the use of specific technologies for the treatment and disposal of wastewater in order to protect natural or fragile areas.
Sec.4. 10 V.S.A. § 1976(a) and (b) are amended to read:
(a)(1) If a municipality submits a written request for delegation of this chapter, the secretary shall delegate authority to the municipality to implement and administer provisions of this chapter, the rules adopted under this chapter, and the enforcement provisions of chapter 201 of this title relating to this chapter, provided that the secretary is satisfied that the municipality:
(A) has
established a process for accepting, reviewing, and processing applications and
issuing permits, which shall adhere to meet or exceed the minimum
requirements of the rules established by the secretary for potable water
supplies and wastewater systems, including permits, by rule, for sewerage
connections;
* * *
(b) As of July 1, 2007, those provisions of municipal ordinances and zoning bylaws that regulate potable water supplies and wastewater systems are superseded by the provisions of this chapter and the rules adopted under this chapter. However, to the extent that local ordinances and bylaws apply to potable water supplies and wastewater systems that are exempt from the permitting requirements of this chapter, and to the extent that those local ordinances and bylaws establish procedural requirements that are consistent with this chapter and meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the rules adopted under this chapter, those provisions of existing and any future ordinances or bylaws shall not be superseded in municipalities that receive delegation under this section.
Pending the question, Shall the House substitute an amendment offered by Rep. Fallar of Tinmouth for the report of the committee on Natural Resources and Energy? Rep. Hube of Londonderry demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House substitute an amendment offered by Rep. Fallar of Tinmouth for the report of the committee on Natural Resources and Energy? was decided in the negative. Yeas, 60. Nays, 67.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Amidon of Charlotte
Anderson of Woodstock
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Chen of Mendon
Connell of Warren
Corcoran of Bennington
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donaghy of Poultney
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Emmons of Springfield
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Head of South Burlington
Hingtgen of Burlington
Hummel of Underhill
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Kenyon of Bradford
Keogh of Burlington
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Molloy of Arlington
Nease of Johnson
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Pugh of South Burlington
Rusten of Halifax
Seibert of Norwich
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Shouldice of Calais
Smith of Morristown
Sweaney of Windsor
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Adams of Hartland
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Brown of Walden
Carey of Chester
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
Donahue of Northfield
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Errecart of Shelburne
Flory of Pittsford
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kainen of Hartford
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
Livingston of Manchester
Marron of Stowe
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Nitka of Ludlow
Otterman of Topsham
Peaslee of Guildhall
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Robinson of Richmond
Rodgers of Glover
Schiavone of Shelburne
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Starr of Troy
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Webster of Randolph
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Young of Orwell
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
DePoy of Rutland City
Edwards of Brattleboro
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Heath of Westford
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Hunt of Essex
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kirker of Essex
Larson of Burlington
LaVoie of Swanton
Metzger of Milton
Miller of Elmore
Monti of Barre City
O'Donnell of Vernon
Parent of St. Albans City
Reese of Pomfret
Rogers of Castleton
Severance of Colchester
Vincent of Waterbury
Waite of Pawlet
Westman of Cambridge
Pending the question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy? Rep. Helm of Castleton moved to amend the report of the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as follows:
By adding a new section to read:
Sec. 3. 10 V.S.A. § 1973(i) is added to read:
(i) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any retail sales establishment may place up to three picnic tables outdoors within the bounds of its property without being required to obtain a state permit, or permit amendment, under this chapter.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the report of the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as recommended by Rep. Helm of Castleton? Rep. Hube of Londonderry demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House amend the report of the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as recommended by Rep. Helm of Castleton? was decided in the affirmative. Yeas, 117. Nays, 12.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Amidon of Charlotte
Anderson of Woodstock
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Botzow of Pownal
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Brown of Walden
Carey of Chester
Chen of Mendon
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Corcoran of Bennington
Crawford of Burke
Cross of Winooski
Crowley of West Rutland
Dakin of Colchester
Donaghy of Poultney
Donahue of Northfield
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Emmons of Springfield
Endres of Milton
Errecart of Shelburne
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
Flory of Pittsford
French of Randolph
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Head of South Burlington
Helm of Castleton
Hingtgen of Burlington
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Hummel of Underhill
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Johnson of Canaan
Kainen of Hartford
Kennedy of Chelsea
Kenyon of Bradford
Keogh of Burlington
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Kiss of Burlington
Klein of East Montpelier
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Lippert of Hinesburg
Livingston of Manchester
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Marron of Stowe
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
McLaughlin of Royalton
Miller of Shaftsbury
Molloy of Arlington
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Nease of Johnson
Nitka of Ludlow
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Partridge of Windham
Peaslee of Guildhall
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Pugh of South Burlington
Robinson of Richmond
Rodgers of Glover
Rusten of Halifax
Schiavone of Shelburne
Sharpe of Bristol
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Shouldice of Calais
Smith of Morristown
Starr of Troy
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweaney of Windsor
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Symington of Jericho
Towne of Berlin
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Valliere of Barre City
Webster of Randolph
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Young of Orwell
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Brooks of Montpelier
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Heath of Westford
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
McCullough of Williston
Milkey of Brattleboro
Seibert of Norwich
Shand of Weathersfield
Smith of New Haven
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Adams of Hartland
Connell of Warren
DePoy of Rutland City
Edwards of Brattleboro
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Hunt of Essex
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kirker of Essex
Larson of Burlington
Metzger of Milton
Miller of Elmore
Monti of Barre City
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Reese of Pomfret
Rogers of Castleton
Severance of Colchester
Vincent of Waterbury
Waite of Pawlet
Rep. Brown of Walden explained his vote as follows:
“Mr. Speaker:
As I see it, this amendment would allow us to have a twenty-four seater yet only a one holer! I would have preferred in this case to have someone engineer this debacle. I would have preferred the Agency to write all their rules. I will sit now.”
Rep. Towne of Berlin explained her vote as follows:
“Mr. Speaker:
Just one and 2/10 miles west of the State House is a dairy crème with at least 3 picnic tables. Yesterday we spent 4 hours bending the rules for marijuana use and today we are quibbling over this amendment to allow a few harmless picnic tables! It is indeed time to finish up.”
Rep. Young of Orwell explained his vote as follows:
“Mr. Speaker:
I knew cutting his hair would make a difference.”
Pending the question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy? Rep. Rodgers of Glover moved to amend the recommendation of proposal of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as follows:
In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. § 1972(9), after the period at the end of the subdivision, by adding the following: If adjoining plots of land become owned by the same person or persons, subdivision shall not be deemed to have occurred when those plots of land are conveyed separately.
Which was agreed to.
Pending the question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy? Reps. Rodgers of Glover, and Starr of Troy moved to amend the recommendation of proposal of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as follows:
In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. § 1972(9), in the first sentence, by striking the number “10” and by inserting in lieu thereof the number “2.5”
Thereupon, Rep. Rodgers of Glover asked and was granted leave of the House to withdraw his recommendation of proposal of amendment.
Pending the question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy? Rep. Rodgers of Glover moved to amend the recommendation of proposal of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as follows:
By adding a new section to read:
Sec. 4. subsection (f) of Sec. 15 of No. 133 of the Acts of the 2001 Adj. Sess. (2002) is amended to read:
(f) Use of revised minimum site conditions.
(1) Until July 1, 2007, the The revised minimum site conditions
for the enhanced prescriptive approach and the performance-based approach set
forth in the rules adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. chapter 64 shall not be
used for wastewater systems serving lots that are created after the effective
date of this act unless the wastewater system is located in a municipality that
has a confirmed planning process and zoning bylaws. This limitation shall not
apply to lots that are ten acres or greater in size that are created between
the effective date of this act and October 31, 2002.
(2) After July 1, 2007, the revised minimum site
conditions may be used in any municipality.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the recommendation of proposal of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as proposed by Rep. Rodgers of Glover? Rep. McCullough of Williston demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House amend the recommendation of proposal of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as proposed by Rep. Rodgers of Glover? was decided in the affirmative. Yeas, 69. Nays, 57.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Carey of Chester
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
Donaghy of Poultney
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Errecart of Shelburne
Flory of Pittsford
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kainen of Hartford
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Perry of Richford
Robinson of Richmond
Rodgers of Glover
Schiavone of Shelburne
Sharpe of Bristol
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Shouldice of Calais
Smith of New Haven
Starr of Troy
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Webster of Randolph
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Young of Orwell
Those who voted in the negative are:
Amidon of Charlotte
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Brown of Walden
Connell of Warren
Corcoran of Bennington
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Emmons of Springfield
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hummel of Underhill
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Kenyon of Bradford
Keogh of Burlington
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Marron of Stowe
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Molloy of Arlington
Nease of Johnson
Nitka of Ludlow
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Peterson of Williston
Pugh of South Burlington
Rusten of Halifax
Seibert of Norwich
Shand of Weathersfield
Smith of Morristown
Sweaney of Windsor
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Adams of Hartland
Anderson of Woodstock
Chen of Mendon
DePoy of Rutland City
Donahue of Northfield
Edwards of Brattleboro
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Hingtgen of Burlington
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Hunt of Essex
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kirker of Essex
Larson of Burlington
Metzger of Milton
Miller of Elmore
Monti of Barre City
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Reese of Pomfret
Rogers of Castleton
Severance of Colchester
Vincent of Waterbury
Waite of Pawlet
Rep. Hube of Londonderry in Chair.
Pending the question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? Reps. Perry of Richford, Darrow of Dummerston, Howrigan of Fairfield, Klein of East Montpelier, Masland of Thetford, Smith of Morristown and Tracy of Burlington moved to amend the recommendation of proposal of amendment as follows:
By striking the following:
Sec. 1. 10 V.S.A. § 1972(9) is amended to read:
(9) “Subdivide” means to divide land by sale, gift, lease, mortgage foreclosure, court-ordered partition, or filing of a plat, plan, or deed in the town records where the act of division creates one or more lots of less than 10 acres in area. Subdivision shall be deemed to have occurred on the conveyance of the first lot or the filing of a plat, plan, or deed in the town records, whichever first occurs. A subdivision of land shall also be deemed to have taken place when a lot is divided by a state or municipal highway, road, or right-of-way, or when a lot is divided by surface waters with a drainage area of greater than ten square miles.
Sec. 2. 10 V.S.A. § 1974 (h) is added to read:
(h) Notwithstanding other provisions of law to the contrary, no permit shall be required under this chapter for any of the actions listed in section 1973 of this title, if those actions pertain to only one single family home on its own lot of 10 acres or more in area.
And inserting in lieu thereof the following :
Sec. 1. RULEMAKING FOR WASTEWATER SYSTEMS
The secretary of natural resources is directed to use all deliberate speed to adopt rules under 10 V.S.A. § 1978 to allow the use of a greater variety of alternative or innovative wastewater disposal technologies.
and by renumbering the remaining sections to be numerically correct.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the recommendation of proposal of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as recommended by Reps. Perry of Richford, et al? Rep. Fisher of Lincoln demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House amend the recommendation of proposal of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as recommended by Reps. Perry of Richford, et al? was decided in the negative. Yeas, 56. Nays, 65.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Amidon of Charlotte
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Connell of Warren
Corcoran of Bennington
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Emmons of Springfield
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hummel of Underhill
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Kenyon of Bradford
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Nease of Johnson
Nitka of Ludlow
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Pugh of South Burlington
Rusten of Halifax
Seibert of Norwich
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Shouldice of Calais
Sweaney of Windsor
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Webster of Randolph
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allard of St. Albans Town
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Brown of Walden
Carey of Chester
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
Donaghy of Poultney
Donahue of Northfield
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Errecart of Shelburne
Flory of Pittsford
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kainen of Hartford
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
Marron of Stowe
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Robinson of Richmond
Schiavone of Shelburne
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Starr of Troy
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Young of Orwell
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Adams of Hartland
Allaire of Rutland City
Anderson of Woodstock
Chen of Mendon
DePoy of Rutland City
Edwards of Brattleboro
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Hingtgen of Burlington
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hunt of Essex
Keenan of St. Albans City
Keogh of Burlington
Kirker of Essex
Larson of Burlington
Metzger of Milton
Miller of Elmore
Molloy of Arlington
Monti of Barre City
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Reese of Pomfret
Rodgers of Glover
Rogers of Castleton
Severance of Colchester
Smith of Morristown
Vincent of Waterbury
Waite of Pawlet
Speaker Freed back in Chair.
Pending the question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? Rep. Symington of Jericho demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? was decided in the affirmative. Yeas, 64. Nays, 57.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allard of St. Albans Town
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Carey of Chester
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
Donaghy of Poultney
Donahue of Northfield
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Errecart of Shelburne
Flory of Pittsford
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kainen of Hartford
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
Marron of Stowe
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Robinson of Richmond
Schiavone of Shelburne
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Starr of Troy
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Young of Orwell
Those who voted in the negative are:
Amidon of Charlotte
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Brown of Walden
Connell of Warren
Corcoran of Bennington
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Emmons of Springfield
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hingtgen of Burlington
Hummel of Underhill
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Kenyon of Bradford
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Nease of Johnson
Nitka of Ludlow
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Pugh of South Burlington
Rusten of Halifax
Seibert of Norwich
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Sweaney of Windsor
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Webster of Randolph
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Adams of Hartland
Allaire of Rutland City
Anderson of Woodstock
Chen of Mendon
DePoy of Rutland City
Edwards of Brattleboro
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hunt of Essex
Keenan of St. Albans City
Keogh of Burlington
Kirker of Essex
Larson of Burlington
Metzger of Milton
Miller of Elmore
Molloy of Arlington
Monti of Barre City
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Reese of Pomfret
Rodgers of Glover
Rogers of Castleton
Severance of Colchester
Shouldice of Calais
Smith of Morristown
Vincent of Waterbury
Waite of Pawlet
Rep. Allard of St. Albans Town explained his vote as follows:
“Mr. Speaker:
For years we fought with the Agency of Natural Resources over the 10 acre exemption. When we finally agreed on closing the 10 acre loophole in exchange for new affordable alternative systems, I thought it was over.
The agency has not lived up to the agreement, so it is time to return to what we had.”
Thereupon, third reading was ordered.
Message from the Senate No. 67
A message was received from the Senate by Mr. Marshall, its Assistant Secretary, as follows:
Mr. Speaker:
I am directed to inform the House that the Senate has considered joint resolutions originating in the House of the following titles:
J.R.H. 53. Joint resolution authorizing the Legislative Council to codify educational charters and agreements as Title 16 Appendix of the Vermont Statutes Annotated.
J.R.H. 71. Joint resolution in support of community-controlled preadjudication programs such as court diversion.
And has adopted the same in concurrence.
The Senate has considered the report of the Committee of Conference upon the disagreeing votes of the two Houses upon House bill of the following title:
H. 79. An act relating to establishing an evidentiary privilege to prohibit the disclosure of communications made to interpreters by hearing impaired persons.
And has accepted and adopted the same on its part.
The Senate has on its part adopted Senate concurrent resolutions of the following titles:
S.C.R. 61. Senate concurrent resolution commemorating the 100th graduating class of Bellows Free Academy-Fairfax (BFA-Fairfax).
S.C.R. 62. Senate concurrent resolution commemorating the 100th football game between Lyndon Institute and St. Johnsbury Academy.
S.C.R. 63. Senate concurrent resolution congratulating Bonnie Gainer on her retirement as executive director of the Rutland County Women’s Network and Shelter.
S.C.R. 64. Senate concurrent resolution Senate concurrent resolution congratulating Malcolm S. “Kim” Rode for his leadership of the Vermont Municipal Bone Bank and the Vermont Educational and Health Building Financing Agency
The Senate has on its part adopted concurrent resolutions originating in the House of the following titles:
H.C.R. 299. House concurrent resolution congratulating the Orleans Country Club on the occasion of the club’s 75th anniversary.
H.C.R. 300. House concurrent resolution congratulating the Morristown Community Playground Improvement Project (MCPIP).
H.C.R. 301. House concurrent resolution congratulating the Edmundite Fathers o the centennial anniversary of their management of the St. Anne’s Shrine on Isle La Motte.
H.C.R. 302. House concurrent resolution congratulating the Stratton Foundation for its outstanding contributions to southern Vermont’s community live and nonprofit organizations.
H.C.R. 303. House concurrent resolution congratulating David Estes on the 25th anniversary of his outstanding service as an educator in the Catholic school system.
H.C.R. 304. House concurrent resolution honoring the cinematic accomplishments of Luis Guzman of Sutton.
H.C.R. 305. House concurrent resolution congratulating Michael Zahner of Marshfield on winning the 2004 National Masters pole vaulting championship.
H.C.R. 306. House concurrent resolution congratulating Gregory Kendal Holtorf upon earning the rank of Eagle Scout.
H.C.R. 307. House concurrent resolution congratulating the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, Burlington Lodge #916, on its centennial anniversary.
H.C.R. 308. House concurrent resolution congratulating the 2004 Black river High School Presidents state championship girls’ snowboarding team.
H.C.R. 309. House concurrent resolution congratulating Pat Bethel on winning his fourth consecutive giant slalom title at the state high school snowboarding championship.
H.C.R. 310. House concurrent resolution in memory of the American military personnel who have died i the service o their nation in Iraq since March 16, 2004.
H.C.R. 311. House concurrent resolution honoring Kathy Francis of Georgia on her designation as the National Social Worker of the Year.
H.C.R. 312. House concurrent resolution expressing support for the members of the U.S. Army Reserve’s 443rd Transportation Company, 89th Regional Readiness Command during its Middle East deployment.
H.C.R. 313. House concurrent resolution congratulating Taylor Wunsch of Swanton on his superb alpine shi racing accomplishments.
H.C.R. 314. House concurrent resolution congratulating Ed Webster of Hyde Park on the completion of his term as president of the New England Association of Fire Chiefs, Inc.
H.C.R. 315. House concurrent resolution congratulating the students of the 3rd and 4th grades at the Bridport Central School on their reenactment of Ethan Allen’s capture of fort Ticonderoga.
H.C.R. 316. House concurrent resolution congratulating David Ely II of Troop #648 in Burlington upon earning the rank of Eagle Scout.
H.C.R. 317. House concurrent resolution congratulating Matt Edmonds of Trop #324 in Pawlet upon earning the rank of Eagle Scout.
H.C.R. 318. House concurrent resolution honoring Bruce Chesney on his retirement from the North Country Career Center.
Senate Proposal of Amendment Concurred in
with a further amendment thereto
H. 752
The Senate proposes to the House to amend House bill, entitled
An act relating to advance directive for health care;
By striking out all after the enacting clause and substituting in lieu thereof the following:
Sec. 1. LEGISLATIVE PARTICIPATION IN THE DECISION-MAKING COMMITTEE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S END-OF-LIFE INITIATIVE
Recognizing that the attorney general has commenced an initiative on end‑of‑life care, including the creation of a committee to consider the legal barriers to appropriate decision-making on health care, that the attorney general has invited public participation in this initiative, and that the decision‑making committee has already provided valuable services to the legislature in identifying and making specific proposals of how to improve Vermont laws with regard to decision-making on health care, the speaker of the house and the senate committee on committees shall appoint one member each from the house and senate committees on health and welfare and judiciary to participate in the decision-making committee of the attorney general’s end‑of‑life initiative. The general assembly anticipates that the committee will consider and recommend legislative action to improve and encourage the use of advance directives, the appropriate use of a default surrogate system and do‑not‑resuscitate orders, the role of the probate court in health care decision‑making, and the appropriate enforcement for failure to follow an advance directive. The general assembly requests the attorney general’s report by November 15, 2004. Legislative members appointed pursuant to this section shall be entitled to per diem compensation and reimbursement of expenses pursuant to section 406 of Title 2.
Sec. 2. ADVANCE DIRECTIVE ACCESSIBILITY STUDY
(a) The department of health shall conduct a study and develop a plan to create and maintain a registry identifying individuals who have executed an advance directive.
(b) The study shall include consideration that:
(1) the registry should be maintained in a secure database that provides authorized health care providers, health care facilities, residential care facilities, funeral directors, and crematory operators immediate access to the registry at all times;
(2) the registry could be consolidated with the anatomical gift registry authorized by section 5248 of Title 18; and
(3) all individuals entered in the registry would have the right to revoke or amend the advance directive as provided in chapter 111 of Title 18.
(c) The study should consider whether a copy of an individual’s advance directive or other means of determining the contents of an individual’s advance directive should be filed in and accessible through the registry.
(d) The commissioner of health is authorized to secure grants from public and private sources to conduct the study, to fund the registry, and to receive and disburse funds which are assigned, donated, or bequeathed to the department to cover the costs of the registry.
(e) The department of health in consultation with the department of motor vehicles shall determine a method of indicating on an individual’s motor vehicle license or identity card that the individual has an advance directive.
(f) The commissioner shall submit a report to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2005.
Sec. 3. 14 V.S.A. § 3453(a) is amended to read:
§ 3453. SCOPE AND DURATION OF AUTHORITY
(a) Subject
to the provisions of this chapter and any express limitations set forth by the
principal in the durable power of attorney for health care advance
directive, the agent shall have the authority to make any and all health
care decisions on the principal’s behalf that the principal could make. An
agent may also have authority to direct the manner of disposition of the
principal’s remains, including the making, limiting, or refusing to make an
anatomical gift pursuant to chapter 109 of Title 18, and the funeral goods and
services to be provided if the agent is appointed to do so in the advance
directive; the authority of an agent appointed for these purposes shall
continue beyond the death of the principal only for so long as may be needed
for the agent to perform these duties.
Sec. 4. 14 V.S.A. § 3454 is amended to read:
§ 3454. USE OF STATUTORY FORMS HEALTH
CARE INSTRUCTIONS; TERMINAL CARE DOCUMENT; DISPOSITION OF REMAINS, FUNERAL
GOODS AND SERVICES; PRE-NEED FUNERAL CONTRACTS
(a) Every person individual
wishing to execute a durable power of attorney for health care shall be
provided with a disclosure statement substantially in the form set forth in
section 3465 of this title prior to execution. The principal shall be required
to sign a statement acknowledging that he or she has received receipt
of the disclosure statement and has read and understands its contents.
(b) A durable power of attorney for health
care executed on or after July 1, 1988 shall be substantially may
be in the form set forth in section 3466 of this title and may include
the appointment of an agent and alternate agent for health care, health care
instructions, a terminal care document, an agent and an alternative agent for
disposition of remains or anatomical gifts, or instructions regarding the
disposition of remains or for funeral goods and services.
(c) An advance directive may make reference to an irrevocable pre-need contract entered into with a funeral director, crematory, or cemetery. To the extent possible, the advance directive should be consistent with the pre-need contract.
Sec. 5. 14 V.S.A. § 3455 is amended to read:
§ 3455. RESTRICTIONS ON WHO CAN ACT AS AGENT; HEALTH CARE DECISIONS; DISPOSITION OF REMAINS, ANATOMICAL GIFTS, OR FUNERAL GOODS AND SERVICES
(a) Health care decisions. A person may not exercise the authority of agent for health care decisions while serving in one of the following capacities:
* * *
(b) Disposition of remains, anatomical gifts, or funeral goods and services. A person may not exercise the authority of agent for disposition of the principal’s remains, anatomical gifts, or funeral goods and services while serving in one of the following capacities, unless said person is a relative of the principal:
(1) a funeral director;
(2) an employee of the funeral director;
(3) a crematory operator;
(4) an employee of the crematory operator;
(5) a cemetery official; or
(6) an employee of a cemetery.
Sec. 6. 14 V.S.A. § 3456 is amended to read:
§ 3456. EXECUTION AND WITNESSES
The durable power of attorney for health care advance directive
shall be signed by the principal in the presence of at least two or more
subscribing witnesses, neither of whom shall, at the time of execution, be the
agent, the principal’s health or residential care provider or the provider’s
employee, the principal’s funeral director, crematory operator, cemetery
official, or an employee thereof, the principal’s spouse, heir, or
reciprocal beneficiary, a person entitled to any part of the estate of the
principal upon the death of the principal under a will or deed in existence or
by operation of law or any other person who has, at the time of execution, any
claims against the estate of the principal. The witnesses shall affirm that
the principal appeared to be of sound mind and free from duress at the time the
durable power of attorney for health care advance directive was
signed and that the principal affirmed that he or she was aware of the nature
of the documents and signed it freely and voluntarily. If the principal is
physically unable to sign, the durable power of attorney for health care
advance directive may be signed by the principal’s name written by some
other person in the principal’s presence and at the principal’s express
direction.
Sec. 7. 14 V.S.A. § 3459 is amended to read:
§ 3459. ACTION BY PROVIDER
(a) A principal’s health or residential care provider, and employees thereof, having knowledge of the principal’s durable power of attorney for health care, shall be bound to follow the directives of the principal’s designated agent to the extent they are consistent with this chapter and the durable power of attorney for health care.
(b) If because of a moral or other conflict with a
specific directive given by the agent, a principal’s health or residential care
provider finds it impossible to follow that directive, he or she the
provider shall forthwith have the duty to inform the agent and if possible
the principal, and actively assist in selecting another health care provider or
physician who is willing to honor the agent’s directive.
(c) Every health care provider, residential care provider, funeral director, crematory operator, and cemetery official shall develop systems to ensure that a principal’s advance directive is promptly available when services are to be provided, including that the existence of an advance directive is prominently noted on the file jacket or folder, if any, and that a note is entered into the provider’s, funeral director’s, crematory operator’s, or cemetery official’s electronic database, if any.
(d)(1) A principal’s funeral director, crematory operator, or cemetery official and employees thereof having knowledge of the principal’s advance directive shall follow the instructions in the advance directive and the directives of the principal’s agent to the extent that they are consistent with this chapter, the advance directive, and applicable law.
(2) If the principal directs a disposition and the principal’s estate is without sufficient funds, the direction shall be void and the disposition shall occur in a manner approximating the principal’s wishes to the extent it is financially possible.
(e) In the event the principal’s instructions in an advance directive regarding the disposition of remains or for funeral goods and services is in apparent conflict with a contract for the disposition of remains, funeral goods, or services entered into by the principal, the most recent document created by the principal shall be followed to the extent of the conflict. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as limiting any other available remedies.
Sec. 8. 14 V.S.A. § 3462 is amended to read:
§ 3462. IMMUNITY
(a) No
person acting as agent pursuant to a durable power of attorney for health
care an advance directive shall be subjected to criminal or civil
liability for making a health care decision in good faith pursuant to
the terms of the durable power of attorney for health care advance
directive and the provisions of this chapter.
(b) No
health or residential care provider, funeral director, crematory
operator, or cemetery official, nor any other person acting for the provider
or under the provider’s such person’s control, shall be subjected
to civil or criminal liability, nor be deemed to have engaged in unprofessional
conduct, for any act or intentional failure to act done in good faith if the
act or intentional failure to act is done pursuant to the dictates of the durable
power of attorney for health care advance directive, the directives
of the patient’s principal’s agent and the provisions of this
chapter. Nothing herein shall be construed to establish immunity for the
failure to exercise due care in the provision of services.
Sec. 9. 14 V.S.A. § 3464 is amended to read:
§ 3464. LIABILITY FOR HEALTH
CARE COSTS
Liability for the cost of health care, disposition
of remains, anatomical gifts, or funeral goods and services provided
pursuant to the agent’s decision made in accordance with an advance
directive shall be the same as if the health care services
were provided pursuant to the principal’s decision.
Sec. 10. 14 V.S.A. § 3466 is amended to read:
§ 3466. DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE; OPTIONAL FORM
The durable
power of attorney shall be in substantially for health care may be in
the following form and may include any of the following provisions:
* * *
Sec. 11. 18 V.S.A. § 5252 is amended to read as follows:
§ 5252. DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall be applicable in the construction of this chapter:
(1) “Advance directive” means a durable power of attorney for health care or a terminal care document, or both. A durable power of attorney for health care may include instructions regarding terminal care. No separate document need be executed.
(1)(2) “Attending physician”
means the physician selected by, or assigned to the patient, who has primary
responsibility for the treatment and care of the patient.
(2)(3) “Extraordinary
measures” means any medical procedure or intervention which utilizes mechanical
or other artificial means to sustain, restore, or supplant a vital function
which, in the judgment of the attending physician, when applied to the patient,
would serve only to artificially postpone the moment of death and where, in the
judgment of the attending physician, the patient is in a terminal state.
(3)(4) “Terminal care
document” means a document which, when duly executed, contains the express
direction that no extraordinary measures be taken when the person executing
said document is in a terminal state, without hope of recovery from such state
and is unable to actively participate in the decision-making process.
(4)(5) “Physician” means a medical doctor licensed to practice in
the state of Vermont, an osteopathic physician licensed pursuant to subdivision
1750(9) of Title 26, an advance practice registered nurse licensed pursuant to
subdivision 1572(4) of Title 26, and a physician’s assistant certified pursuant
to section 1733 of Title 26.
(5)(6) “Terminal state” means
an incurable condition caused by injury, disease or illness which regardless of
the application of life-saving procedures would, within reasonable medical
judgment, produce death and where application of life-sustaining procedures
would only postpone the moment of death.
Sec. 12. 18 V.S.A. § 5256 is amended to read:
§ 5256. ACTION BY PHYSICIAN
(a) An attending physician
and any other physician under his the physician’s direction or
control, having in his the physician’s possession his the
patient’s terminal care document, or having knowledge that such a duly executed
document is part of the patient’s record in the institution in which he the
patient is receiving care, shall be bound to follow as closely as possible
the dictates of said document. However, if because of moral conflict with the
spirit of this act, a physician finds it impossible to follow his the
patient’s directions, he the physician shall forthwith have a
duty to so inform his the patient or of those
facts and actively assist in selecting another physician who is willing to
honor the patient’s directions, or both.
(b) Every health care provider and residential care provider shall develop systems to ensure that a patient’s advance directive is promptly available when the patient is to receive services from the provider, including that the existence of an advance directive is prominently noted on the file jacket or folder, if any, and that a note is entered into the provider’s electronic database, if any.
Sec. 13. STUDY ON PAIN MANAGEMENT
The department of health, in collaboration with interested parties, including the commissioner of aging and disabilities, the office of professional regulation, the pain/symptom management committee of the Attorney General’s end of life care initiative, the Vermont Program for Quality in Health Care, Inc., health care providers, health care facilities, nursing homes, residential care facilities, as well as individuals who have experienced or currently experience symptoms of pain or the families of those individuals, shall investigate and evaluate methods for improving pain management. Such methods shall include: improving standards of practice for medical professionals with respect to pain assessment and treatment; incorporating pain management into the hospital credentialing process for physicians; requiring continuing education in pain management for health care providers; developing uniform recordkeeping requirements for assessing a patient’s pain; establishing, by administrative rule, legally enforceable standards for assessing and treating pain; providing and enhancing rights to pain assessment and management for individuals in health care facilities; establishing educational partnerships on pain management among communities, health professionals, and health training programs; and developing enhanced training in pain management, including the use of medical marijuana, in the medical school, residency training programs, and nursing schools in Vermont. The commissioner also shall inventory existing studies on pain management and shall attempt to establish a baseline measure of current pain management methods against which the effects of improvement initiatives may be measured. With respect to the requirements of this section, the commissioner shall report the findings and recommendations to the general assembly by January 15, 2005.
Sec. 14. 33 V.S.A. § 7301 is amended to read:
§ 7301. NURSING HOME RESIDENTS’ BILL OF RIGHTS
The general assembly hereby adopts the Nursing Home Residents’ Bill of Rights as follows:
(1) The governing body of
the facility shall establish written policies regarding the rights and
responsibilities of residents and, through the administrator, is responsible
for development of, and adherence to, procedures implementing such policies.
These policies and procedures shall be made available to residents, to any
guardians, next of kin, reciprocal beneficiaries, sponsoring agency, or
representative payees selected pursuant to section subsection
205(j) of the Social Security Act, and Subpart Q of 20 CFR Part 404, and to the
public.
(2) The staff of the
facility shall ensure that, at least, each person individual
admitted to the facility:
(1)(A) is fully informed, as
evidenced by the resident’s written acknowledgment, prior to or at the time of
admission and during the stay, of these rights and of all rules and regulations
governing resident conduct and responsibilities. Reasonable accommodation
shall be made to communicate the resident’s bill of rights to residents with
communication impairments and residents who speak a language other than
English;
(2)(B) is fully informed,
prior to or at the time of admission and during stay, of services available in
the facility, and of related charges including any charges for services not
covered under Titles XVIII or XIX of the Social Security Act, or not covered by
the facility’s basic per diem rate, including the facility’s policy on
providing toiletries, adult briefs, wheelchairs, and all personal care and
medical items. The facility shall inform residents in writing about Medicaid
and Medicare eligibility and what is covered under those programs including
information on resource limits and allowable uses of the resident’s income for
items and services not covered by Medicaid and Medicare. The facility shall
inform residents or their guardians or agents in writing about eligibility for
hospice services and the circumstances under which hospice services may be
available;
(3)(C) is fully informed, by
a physician, of his or her the medical condition, and is afforded
the opportunity to participate in the planning of his or her the
medical treatment and to refuse to participate in experimental research;
(4)(D) is transferred or
discharged only for medical reasons, or for his or her the resident’s
welfare or that of other residents, or for nonpayment of his or her the
resident’s stay (except as prohibited by Titles XVIII or XIX of the Social
Security Act), and is given reasonable advance notice to ensure orderly
transfer or discharge, and such actions are documented in his or her the
resident’s medical record. Residents shall be notified in writing of the
proposed transfer or discharge and reasons for it at least 72 hours before a
transfer within the facility and 30 days before a discharge from the facility.
In cases where the health or safety of individuals would be endangered, or an
immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident’s urgent medical
needs, notice shall be made as soon as practicable before transfer or
discharge. Notice shall explain the resident’s right to appeal the proposed
action, under the facility’s grievance procedure and shall include the address
and phone number of the area ombudsman. The resident informed of this right
may choose to relocate before the notice period ends. The facility shall make
reasonable efforts to accommodate new residents without disrupting room
assignments;
(5)(E) is encouraged and
assisted, throughout his or her the resident’s period of stay, to
exercise his or her the individual’s rights as a resident and as
a citizen, and to this end may voice grievances and recommend changes in
policies and services to facility staff or to outside representatives of his
or her the resident’s choice, free from restraint, interference,
coercion, discrimination, or reprisal;
(6)(F) may manage his or
her the resident’s personal financial affairs, or is given at least
a quarterly accounting of financial transactions made on his or her the
resident’s behalf should the facility accept his or her the
resident’s written delegation of this responsibility to the facility for
any period of time in conformance with state law;
(7)(G) is free from mental
and physical abuse, and free from chemical and (except in emergencies) physical
restraints except as authorized in writing by a physician for a specified and
limited period of time, or when necessary to protect the resident from injury
to himself or herself or self‑injury or injury to others. The
facility shall inform residents of its restraint policy and appeal rights under
the facility’s grievance procedure. The policy must include the release of the
restraints no less than every two hours for ten minutes for exercise or
repositioning. The resident has the right to be free from any physical
restraints imposed or psychoactive drugs administered for purposes of
discipline or convenience;
(8)(H) is assured
confidential treatment of his or her the resident’s personal and
medical records, and may approve or refuse their release to any individual
outside the facility, except, in case of his or her the resident’s
transfer to another health care institution, or as required by law or
third-party payment contract;
(9)(I) is treated with
consideration, respect, and full recognition of his or her the
resident’s dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and in
care for his or her the resident’s personal needs;
(10)(J) is not required to
perform services for the facility that are not included for therapeutic
purposes in his or her the resident’s plan of care;
(11)(K) may associate and
communicate privately with persons of his or her the resident’s
choice, and send and receive his or her the resident’s personal
mail unopened;
(12)(L) may meet with, and
participate in activities of social, religious, and community groups at his
or her the resident’s discretion;
(13)(M) may retain and use his
or her the resident’s personal clothing and possessions as space
permits, unless to do so would infringe upon rights of other residents;
(14)(N) if married or in a
reciprocal beneficiaries relationship, is assured privacy for visits by his
or her the resident’s spouse or reciprocal beneficiary; if both are
residents of the facility, they are permitted to share a room;
(15)(O) residents shall
have the right to choose their the resident’s own personal
physician, and the right to request a second opinion from a physician of the
resident’s choice where significant alternatives for care or treatment exist,
or when the resident requests information concerning care or treatment
alternatives, the resident has the right to receive such information from his
or her the resident’s doctor or the administrators as appropriate;
(16)(P) to the extent
permitted by law, the resident has the right to refuse care or
treatment, including the right to discharge himself or herself from the
facility, and to be informed of the consequences of that action and the nursing
home shall be relieved of any further responsibility for that refusal;
(17)(Q) is assured reasonable
access to a telephone located in a quiet area where the resident can conduct a
private conversation;
(18)(R) has the right to
return to the first available bed in the nursing home he or she the
resident came from, after hospitalization if the patient has not retained his
or her the resident’s bed under subdivision (19)(S) of
this section subdivision (2), provided the facility is able to
meet the resident’s medical needs and that the resident’s welfare or that of
other residents will not be adversely affected;
(19)(S) has the right upon
payment of his or her the resident’s usual rate or, in the case
of Medicaid residents, his or her the resident’s certified per
diem compensation, to retain his or her the resident’s bed in the
nursing home while absent from the facility due to hospitalization provided
such absence does not exceed ten successive days; and
(T) is provided with professional assessment of pain and its management.
(20)
residents and their families, including a reciprocal beneficiary, shall have
the right to organize, maintain, and participate in either resident or family
councils or both. The facility shall provide space and, if requested,
assistance for meetings. Council meetings shall be afforded privacy, with
staff or visitors attending only at the council’s invitation. The facility
shall respond in writing to written requests from council meetings. Resident
councils and family councils shall be encouraged to make recommendations
regarding facility policies;
(21) residents and their families, including a
reciprocal beneficiary, shall have the right to review current and past state
and federal survey and inspection reports of the facility, and upon request, to
receive from the facility a copy of any report. Copies of reports shall be
available for review at any time at one station in the facility. The facility
may charge a reasonable amount for more than one copy per resident.
(3) The staff of the facility shall ensure that the residents and their families, including a reciprocal beneficiary:
(A) shall have the right to organize, maintain, and participate in either resident or family councils, or both. The facility shall provide space and, if requested, assistance for meetings. Council meetings shall be afforded privacy, with staff or visitors attending only at the council’s invitation. The facility shall respond in writing to written requests from council meetings. Resident councils and family councils shall be encouraged to make recommendations regarding facility policies;
(B) shall have the right to review current and past state and federal survey and inspection reports of the facility, and upon request, to receive a copy of any report from the facility. Copies of reports shall be available for review at any time at one station in the facility. The facility may charge a reasonable amount for more than one copy per resident.
Sec. 15. RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME BILL OF RIGHTS
Notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 25 of Title 3, the department of aging and disabilities shall amend section VI of the residential care home regulations to include the right of each resident to professional assessment of pain and its management without the requirement that the department go through the formal rulemaking process. The amended rule shall have the same force and effect as if adopted pursuant to chapter 25 of Title 3.
Sec. 16. STATUTORY REVISION
Sections 5251 through 5262 of Title 18 shall be recodified as subchapter 1 of chapter 111 of Title 18. Chapter 121 of Title 14 shall be recodified as subchapter 2 of chapter 111 of Title 18 and the sections renumbered as necessary. Section 5252 (Definitions) of Title 18 and section 3452 (Definitions) of Title 14 shall be combined into a new definitions section which shall apply to chapter 111 of Title 18. Any duplicative definitions shall be removed and if there are minor differences, the definition in section 5252 of Title 18 shall be used. Chapter 111 of Title 18 shall be redesignated “Advance Directives for Health Care and End of Life.”
Sec. 16a. 18 V.S.A. chapter 86 is amended to read:
CHAPTER 86. THERAPEUTIC USE OF CANNABIS
Subchapter 1. Research Program
§ 4471. Cannabis therapeutic research program; establishment; participation
* * *
Subchapter 2. Marijuana Use by Persons with Severe Illness
§ 4472. DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this subchapter:
(1) “Bona fide physician-patient relationship” means a treating or consulting relationship, in the course of which a physician has completed a full assessment of the registered patient’s medical history and current medical condition, including a personal physical examination.
(2) “Debilitating medical condition” means cancer, multiple sclerosis, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, positive status for human immunodeficiency virus, or a life threatening, progressive, and debilitating disease or medical condition, if:
(A) the disease or medical condition or its treatment produces severe, persistent, and intractable symptoms such as cachexia or wasting syndrome; severe nausea; severe pain; or seizures; and
(B) in the context of the specific condition, reasonable efforts have been made over a reasonable amount of time without success in relieving the symptoms.
(3) “Marijuana” shall have the same meaning as provided in subdivision 4201(15) of this title.
(4) “Possession limit” means the amount of marijuana collectively possessed between the registered patient and the patient’s registered caregiver which is no more than two mature marijuana plant, three immature plants, and two ounces of usable marijuana.
(5) “Physician” means a person who is licensed under chapter 23 or chapter 33 of Title 26, and is licensed with authority to prescribe drugs under Title 26.
(6) “Registered caregiver” means a person who is at least 21 years old who has never been convicted of a drug-related crime and who has agreed to undertake responsibility for managing the well-being of a registered patient with respect to the use of marijuana for symptom relief.
(7) “Registered patient” means a person who has been issued a registration card by the department of public safety identifying the person as having a debilitating medical condition pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter.
(8) “Secure indoor facility” means a building or room equipped with locks or other security devices that permit access only by a registered caregiver or registered patient.
(9) “Usable marijuana” means the dried leaves and flowers of marijuana, and any mixture or preparation thereof, and does not include the seeds, stalks, and roots of the plant.
(10) “Use for symptom relief” means the acquisition, possession, cultivation, use, transfer, or transportation of marijuana or paraphernalia relating to the administration of marijuana to alleviate the symptoms or effects of a registered patient’s debilitating medical condition which is in compliance with all the limitations and restrictions of this subchapter. For the purposes of this definition, “transfer” is limited to the transfer of marijuana and paraphernalia between a registered caregiver and a registered patient.
§ 4473. ADMINISTRATION
The department of public safety shall establish a distinct, dedicated phone line to provide Vermonters with information about the registration process and requirements. Any information received from individuals shall be confidential and shall comply with the “Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information” contained in Parts 160 and 164 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 45 C.F.R. §§ 160.101 et seq. and 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.102 et seq.
§ 4474. REGISTERED PATIENTS; QUALIFICATION STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES
(a) To become a registered patient, a person must be diagnosed with a debilitating medical condition by a physician in the course of a bona fide physician-patient relationship.
(b) The department of public safety shall review applications to become a registered patient using the following procedures:
(1) A patient with a debilitating medical condition shall submit, under oath, a signed application for registration to the department. If the patient is under the age of 18 the application must be signed by both the patient and a parent or guardian. The application shall require identification and contact information for the patient and the patient’s registered caregiver applying for authorization under section 4475 of this title, if any. The applicant shall attach to the application a copy of relevant portions of the patient’s medical record sufficient to establish that the patient has a debilitating medical condition.
(2) The department shall contact the physician for purposes of verifying the existence of a bona fide physician-patient relationship and the accuracy of the medical record.
(3) The department shall approve or deny the application for registration in writing within 30 days from receipt of a completed registration application. If the application is approved, the department shall issue the applicant a registration card which shall include the registered patient’s name and photograph, as well as a unique identifier for law enforcement verification purposes under section 4479 of this title.
(4)(A) A review board is established. The medical practice board shall appoint three physicians licensed in Vermont to constitute the review board. If an application under subdivision (1) of this subsection is denied, within seven days the patient may appeal the denial to the board. Review shall be limited to information submitted by the patient under subdivision (1) of this subsection, and consultation with the patient’s treating physician. All records relating to the appeal shall be kept confidential. An appeal shall be decided by majority vote of the members of the board.
(B) The board shall meet periodically to review studies, data, and any other information relevant to the use of marijuana for symptom relief. The board may make recommendations to the general assembly for adjustments and changes to chapter 86 of this title.
(C) Members of the board shall serve for three-year terms, beginning February 1 of the year in which the appointment is made, except that the first members appointed shall serve as follows: one for a term of two years, one for a term of three years, and one for a term of four years. Members shall be entitled to per diem compensation authorized under section 1010 of Title 32. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment for the unexpired portion of the term vacated.
§ 4475. REGISTERED CAREGIVERS; QUALIFICATION STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES
(a) A person may submit a signed application to the department of public safety to become a registered patient’s registered caregiver. The department shall approve or deny the application in writing within 30 days. The department shall approve a registered caregiver’s application and issue the person an authorization card, including the caregiver’s name, photograph, and a unique identifier, after verifying:
(1) the person will serve as the registered caregiver for one registered patient only; and
(2) the person has never been convicted of a drug‑related crime.
(b) Prior to acting on an application, the department shall obtain from the Vermont criminal information center a Vermont criminal record, an
out-of-state criminal record, and a criminal record from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the applicant. For purposes of this subdivision, “criminal record” means a record of whether the person has ever been convicted of a drug-related crime. Each applicant shall consent to release of criminal records to the department on forms substantially similar to the release forms developed by the center pursuant to section 2056c of Title 20. The department shall comply with all laws regulating the release of criminal history records and the protection of individual privacy. The Vermont criminal information center shall send to the requester any record received pursuant to this section or inform the department that no record exists. If the department disapproves an application, the department shall promptly provide a copy of any record of convictions and pending criminal charges to the applicant and shall inform the applicant of the right to appeal the accuracy and completeness of the record pursuant to rules adopted by the Vermont criminal information center. No person shall confirm the existence or nonexistence of criminal record information to any person who would not be eligible to receive the information pursuant to this subchapter.
(c) A registered caregiver may serve only one registered patient at a time, and a registered patient may have only one registered caregiver at a time.
§ 4476. REGISTRATION; FEES
(a) The department shall establish a fee for the application authorized by sections 4474 and 4475 of this title not to exceed $100.00. The fees received by the department shall be deposited into a registration fee fund and used to offset the costs of processing applications under this subchapter.
(b) A registration card shall expire one year after the date of issue, with the option of renewal, provided the patient submits a new application which is approved by the department, pursuant to section 4474 or 4475 of this title, and pays the fee required under subsection (a) of this section.
§ 4477. EXEMPTION FROM CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PENALTIES; SEIZURE OF PROPERTY
(a) A person who has in his or her possession a valid registration card issued pursuant to this subchapter and who is in compliance with the requirements of this subchapter, including the possession limits in subdivision 4472(4) of this title, shall be exempt from arrest or prosecution under subsection 4230(a) of this title.
(b) A physician who has participated in a patient’s application process under subdivision 4474(b)(2) of this title shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or disciplinary action under chapter 23 of Title 26, penalized in any manner, or denied any right or privilege under state law, except for giving false information, pursuant to subsection 4478(f) of this title.
(c) No person shall be subject to arrest or prosecution for constructive possession, conspiracy, or any other offense for simply being in the presence or vicinity of a registered patient or registered caregiver engaged in use of marijuana for symptom relief.
(d) A law enforcement officer shall not be required to return marijuana or paraphernalia relating to its use seized from a registered patient or registered caregiver.
§ 4478. PROHIBITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND LIMITATIONS REGARDING THE USE OF MARIJUANA FOR SYMPTOM RELIEF
(a) This subchapter shall not exempt any person from arrest or prosecution for:
(1) Being under the influence of marijuana while:
(A) operating a motor vehicle, boat, or vessel, or any other vehicle propelled or drawn by power other than muscular power;
(B) in a workplace or place of employment; or
(C) operating heavy machinery or handling a dangerous instrumentality.
(2) The use or possession of marijuana by a registered patient or a registered caregiver:
(A) for purposes other than symptom relief as permitted by this subchapter; or
(B) in a manner that endangers the health or well-being of another person.
(3) The smoking of marijuana in any public place, including:
(A) a school bus, public bus, or other public vehicle;
(B) a workplace or place of employment;
(C) any school grounds;
(D) any correctional facility; or
(E) any public park, public beach, public recreation center, or youth center.
(b) This chapter shall not be construed to require that coverage or reimbursement for the use of marijuana for symptom relief be provided by:
(1) a health insurer as defined by subdivision 9402(7) of this title, or any insurance company regulated under Title 8;
(2) an employer; or
(3) for purposes of worker’s compensation, an employer as defined in subdivision 601(3) of Title 21.
(c) A registered patient or registered caregiver who elects to grow marijuana to be used for symptom relief by the patient may do so only if the marijuana is cultivated in a single, secure indoor facility.
(d) A registered patient or registered caregiver may not transport marijuana in public unless it is secured in a locked container.
(e) Within 72 hours after the death of a registered patient, the patient’s registered caregiver shall return to the department of public safety for disposal any marijuana or marijuana plants in the possession of the patient or registered caregiver at the time of the patient’s death. If the patient did not have a registered caregiver, the patient’s next of kin shall contact the department within 72 hours after the patient’s death and shall ask the department of public safety to retrieve such marijuana and marijuana plants for disposal.
(f) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, a person who knowingly gives to any law enforcement officer false information to avoid arrest or prosecution, or to assist another in avoiding arrest or prosecution, shall be imprisoned for not more than one year or fined not more than $1,000.00, or both. This penalty shall be in addition to any other penalties that may apply for the possession or use of marijuana.
§ 4479. LAW ENFORCEMENT VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION; RULEMAKING
(a) The department of public safety shall maintain and keep confidential, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section and except for purposes of a prosecution for false swearing under section 2904 of Title 13, the records of all persons registered under this subchapter or registered caregivers in a secure database accessible by authorized department of health employees only.
(b) In response to a person-specific or property-specific inquiry by a law enforcement officer or agency made in the course of a bona fide investigation or prosecution, the department may verify the identities and registered property addresses of the registered patient and the patient’s registered caregiver.
(c) The department shall maintain a separate secure electronic database accessible to law enforcement personnel 24 hours a day that uses a unique identifier system to allow law enforcement to verify that a person is a registered patient or registered caregiver.
(d) The department of public safety shall implement the requirements of this act within 120 days of its effective date. The department may adopt rules under chapter 25 of Title 3 and shall develop forms to implement this act.
Sec. 16b. REPORT
The department of public safety, with input from the review board and the department of health, shall report to the house and senate committees on health and welfare and judiciary on the use of marijuana for symptom relief by January 1, 2006. The report shall include:
(1) statistics regarding the number of people using marijuana for symptom relief, the number of applications received by the department for persons to become registered patients or registered caregivers, and the types of debilitating medical conditions presented in the applications;
(2) a summary of the current research, including the conclusions of the Institute of Medicine, regarding whether there are legitimate medical uses of marijuana;
(3) an evaluation of the costs of permitting the use of marijuana for symptom relief, including any costs to law enforcement officers and costs of any litigation;
(4) an analysis of whether permitting the use of marijuana for symptom relief has made it more difficult to enforce criminal laws relating to substance abuse;
(5) an analysis of whether permitting the use of marijuana for symptom relief has increased illegal marijuana use by creating a public perception that arrests for possession and use of marijuana have become less likely to occur, and criminal charges have become more difficult to prosecute;
(6) statistics regarding the number of prosecutions brought against doctors and other persons for violations of this act; and
(7) whether the United States Food and Drug Administration has altered its position regarding the use of marijuana for medical purposes or has approved alternative delivery systems for marijuana.
Sec. 17. EFFECTIVE DATE; TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS
(a) This section and Secs. 1 and 10 of this act shall take effect upon passage.
(b) Secs. 3-9 and 11-12 of this act shall apply to any advance directive entered into on and after July 1, 2004. This act shall not apply to powers of attorney executed before July 1, 1988 or to durable powers of attorney for health care and terminal care documents executed prior to July 1, 2004.
(c) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any irrevocable pre-need contract in effect prior to July 1, 2004 shall be considered an advance directive, may not be amended except by the principal, and shall be enforced as if entered into on or after July 1, 2004 and pursuant to the provisions of Secs. 3 through 12 of this act.
and by amending the title to read: “AN ACT RELATING TO ADVANCE DIRECTIVES FOR HEALTH CARE, PAIN MANAGEMENT, AND LONG‑TERM CARE”
Rep. Maier of Middlebury moved to concur in the Senate proposal of amendment with a further amendment thereto:
First: In Sec. 13, in the second sentence, before the words “and developing enhanced training in pain management,” by inserting the words: “developing a program, subject to subsequent legislative authorization, for monitoring all prescription drug use in Vermont and tracking the prescribing patterns of providers of federally controlled substances;”
Second: By striking Secs. 15, 16a, and 16b in their entirety and renumbering Sec. 17 to be Sec. 15
Which was agreed to.
Joint Resolution Adopted
J.R.H. 76
Joint resolution, entitled
Joint resolution urging the federal government not to reduce funding for federal housing support programs nor convert the Section 8 housing voucher program into a block grant;
Was taken up and adopted on the part of the House.
Rules Suspended; Senate Proposal of Amendment Not Concurred in;
Committee of Conference Requested and Appointed
H. 272
On motion of Rep. Symington of Jericho, the rules were suspended and House bill, entitled
An act relating to nutrition policy in Vermont schools;
Appearing on the Calendar for notice, was taken up for immediate consideration.
The Senate proposes to the House to amend the bill by striking out all after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Sec. 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
It is the purpose of this act to encourage wellness programs in Vermont public schools and in Vermont communities. Wellness programs will be designed to encourage life-long patterns of healthy eating and regular physical exercise among Vermont citizens.
Sec. 2. 16 V.S.A. § 216 is added to read:
§ 216. WELLNESS PROGRAM
(a) In this section:
(1) “Physical activity program” means a program which includes, in addition to regular physical education classes, minimum daily physical activity for each student provided through activities such as recess and other recreation periods, and participation in athletics either during or after regular school hours. “Physical activity” means moderate and vigorous physical activities.
(2) “Physical education program” means a program which is a sequential, developmentally appropriate program that is an enjoyable experience for students and designed to help students develop the knowledge, skill, self-management skill, attitudes, and confidence needed to adopt and maintain physical fitness throughout their lives.
(3) “Fitness program” means a program which includes a physical education program and a physical activity program.
(4) “Nutrition” includes all food and beverages sold or served in the food service program, vending machines, snack bars, and school stores.
(5) “Wellness program” means a program which includes fitness and nutrition.
(b) The commissioner with the approval of the state board shall establish an advisory council on wellness which shall include at least three members associated with the health services field. The members shall serve without compensation but shall receive their actual expenses incurred in the pursuit of their duties relating to wellness programs. The council shall assist the department of education in planning, coordinating, and encouraging wellness programs in the public schools.
(c) The commissioner shall collaborate with other agencies and councils working on childhood wellness to:
(1) Supervise the preparation of appropriate nutrition and fitness curricula for use in the public schools, promote programs for the preparation of teachers to teach these curricula, and assist in the development of wellness programs.
(2) Prepare and continually update a list of school and community programs which have the potential to improve childhood wellness. The commissioner shall make the list available to all school districts and to any community groups that request it.
(3) Establish and maintain a website which displays data from a youth risk behavior survey in a way that enables the public to aggregate and disaggregate the information.
(4) Research funding opportunities for schools and communities that wish to build wellness programs and make the information available to the public.
(d) The department shall offer assistance to school districts and supervisory unions to provide teacher instruction in wellness programs.
(e) Any school district board or supervisory union board may establish a wellness community advisory council to inventory community programs and assets and to assist the school board and community in developing and implementing wellness programs. The school board shall provide public notice to the community to allow all interested parties to apply for appointment. The school board shall endeavor to appoint members that represent various points of view and expertise within the community regarding wellness programs. Members may include representatives from coordinated school health teams, teachers, school administrators, students, community members, health care providers, parents, and others.
Sec. 3. COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION; SECRETARY OF HUMAN SERVICES; CHILDHOOD FITNESS AND NUTRITION MODEL POLICIES; COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAM
(a) The commissioner of education shall collaborate with the secretary of human services and the secretary of agriculture, foods and markets to write a model school fitness and nutrition policy. The policy shall be available to school districts on or before January 1, 2005. The model policy shall include:
(1) A definition of nutritious foods, nutritional guidelines, and policies regarding purchasing of locally grown foods for food and beverages sold or served in the food service program, vending machines, snack bars, and school stores.
(2) A model physical education curriculum which is a sequential, developmentally appropriate program that is an enjoyable experience for students and designed to help students develop the knowledge, skill, self‑management skill, attitudes, and confidence needed to adopt and maintain physical fitness throughout their lives. The model program shall include an annual report to parents which describes their child’s performance on fitness and other wellness indicators.
(3) Model physical activity policies which include, in addition to regular physical education classes, minimum daily physical activity for each student provided through programs such as recess and other recreation periods, and participation in athletics either during or after regular school hours. In this subsection, “physical activity” means moderate and vigorous physical activities.
(4) A process for implementing and enforcing nutrition and physical fitness policies.
(5) A process for gathering data on the health status of students reporting aggregate data to the community.
(b) The commissioner of education shall develop and implement a wellness grant program which awards funds to help school communities establish a wellness program pursuant to section 216 of Title 16. The funds may be used to establish a wellness community advisory council, inventory community programs and assets, gather data about the health status of children in the community, adopt a fitness and nutrition policy based on the model policy developed under subsection (a) of this section, begin to implement and coordinate wellness programs in the community based on the adopted policy, and seek funding for further implementation of the policy from other sources such as the department of health.
(c) On or before January 15, 2006, the commissioner of education shall report to the senate and house committees on education on the implementation of this act.
Sec. 4. POSITION CREATED
One position - educational consultant II - is created in the department of education, safe and healthy schools division, for the purpose of implementing this act.
Pending the question, Will the House concur in the Senate proposal of amendment? Rep. McLaughlin of Royalton moved that the House refuse to concur and ask for a Committee of Conference, which was agreed to, and the Speaker appointed as members of the Committee of Conference on the part of the House:
Rep. Branagan of Georgia
Rep. Chen of Mendon
Rep. McLaughlin of Royalton
Bills Messaged to Senate Forthwith
On motion of Rep. Symington of Jericho, the rules were suspended and the bills were ordered messaged to the Senate forthwith.
H. 272
House bill, entitled
An act relating to nutrition policy in Vermont schools;
H. 752
House bill, entitled
An act relating to advance directive for health care;
Bill Not Messaged to Senate Forthwith
S. 76
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to the medical use of marijuana;
Rep. Zuckerman of Burlington moved to suspend the rules and message the bill to the Senate forthwith.
Pending the question, Shall the House suspend the rules and message the bill to the Senate forthwith? Rep. Connell of Warren demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House suspend the rules and message the bill to the Senate forthwith? was decided in the negative. Yeas, 58. Nays, 51. a 3/4 vote of 82 needed.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Brown of Walden
Connell of Warren
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donahue of Northfield
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Emmons of Springfield
Errecart of Shelburne
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hingtgen of Burlington
Hummel of Underhill
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Kenyon of Bradford
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Marron of Stowe
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Myers of Essex
Nease of Johnson
Nitka of Ludlow
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
O'Donnell of Vernon
Partridge of Windham
Pugh of South Burlington
Rusten of Halifax
Seibert of Norwich
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Sweaney of Windsor
Sweetser of Essex
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Branagan of Georgia
Carey of Chester
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Corcoran of Bennington
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
Donaghy of Poultney
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Flory of Pittsford
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Morrissey of Bennington
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Robinson of Richmond
Schiavone of Shelburne
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Webster of Randolph
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Young of Orwell
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Adams of Hartland
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Amidon of Charlotte
Anderson of Woodstock
Brennan of Colchester
Chen of Mendon
DePoy of Rutland City
Edwards of Brattleboro
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hunt of Essex
Kainen of Hartford
Keenan of St. Albans City
Keogh of Burlington
Kirker of Essex
Klein of East Montpelier
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Larson of Burlington
Metzger of Milton
Miller of Elmore
Molloy of Arlington
Monti of Barre City
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Reese of Pomfret
Rodgers of Glover
Rogers of Castleton
Severance of Colchester
Shouldice of Calais
Smith of Morristown
Starr of Troy
Vincent of Waterbury
Waite of Pawlet
Westman of Cambridge
Wright of Burlington
At five o’clock and forty-five minutes in the afternoon, on motion of Rep. Hube of Londonderry, the House adjourned until Tuesday, May 18, 2004, at two o’clock in the afternoon, pursuant to the provisions of J.R.S. 66.
Concurrent Resolutions Adopted
The following concurrent resolutions, having been placed on the Consent Calendar on the preceding legislative day, and no member having requested floor consideration as provided by the Joint Rules of the Senate and House of Representatives, are hereby adopted in concurrence.
H.C.R. 299
House concurrent resolution congratulating the Orleans Country Club on the occasion of the club’s 75th anniversary
H.C.R. 300
House concurrent resolution congratulating the Morristown Community
Playground Improvement Project (MCPIP)
H.C.R. 301
House concurrent resolution congratulating the Edmundite Fathers on the centennial anniversary of their management of the St. Anne’s Shrine on Isle La Motte
H.C.R. 302
House concurrent resolution congratulating the Stratton Foundation for its outstanding contributions to southern Vermont’s community life and nonprofit organizations
H.C.R. 303
House concurrent resolution congratulating David Estes on the 25th anniversary of his outstanding service as an educator in the Catholic school system
H.C.R. 304
House concurrent resolution honoring the cinematic accomplishments of Luis Guzman of Sutton
H.C.R. 305
House concurrent resolution congratulating Michael Zahner of Marshfield on winning the 2004 National Masters pole vaulting championship
H.C.R. 306
House concurrent resolution congratulating Gregory Kendal Holtorf upon earning the rank of Eagle Scout
H.C.R. 307
House concurrent resolution congratulating the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, Burlington Lodge #916, on its centennial anniversary
H.C.R. 308
House concurrent resolution congratulating the 2004 Black River High School Presidents state championship girls’ snowboarding team
H.C.R. 309
House concurrent resolution congratulating Pat Bethel on winning his fourth consecutive giant slalom title at the state high school snowboarding championship
H.C.R. 310
House concurrent resolution in memory of the American military personnel who have died in the service of their nation in Iraq since March 16, 2004
H.C.R. 311
House concurrent resolution honoring Kathy Francis of Georgia on her designation as the National Social Worker of the Year
H.C.R. 312
House concurrent resolution expressing support for the members of the U.S. Army Reserve’s 443rd Transportation Company, 89th Regional Readiness Command during its Middle East deployment
H.C.R. 313
House concurrent resolution congratulating Taylor Wunsch of Swanton on his superb alpine ski racing accomplishments
H.C.R. 314
House concurrent resolution congratulating Ed Webster of Hyde Park on the completion of his term as president of the New England Association of Fire Chiefs, Inc.
H.C.R. 315
House concurrent resolution congratulating the students of the 3rd and 4th grades at the Bridport Central School on their reenactment of Ethan Allen’s capture of Fort Ticonderoga
H.C.R. 316
House concurrent resolution congratulating David Ely II of Troop #648 in Burlington upon earning the rank of Eagle Scout
H.C.R. 317
House concurrent resolution congratulating Matt Edmonds of Troop #324 in Pawlet upon earning the rank of Eagle Scout
H.C.R. 318
House concurrent resolution honoring Bruce Chesney on his retirement from the North Country Career Center.
S.C.R. 61.
Senate concurrent resolution commemorating the 100th graduating class of Bellows Free Academy-Fairfax (BFA-Fairfax).
S.C.R. 62.
Senate concurrent resolution commemorating the 100th football game between Lyndon Institute and St. Johnsbury Academy.
S.C.R. 63.
Senate concurrent resolution congratulating Bonnie Gainer on her retirement as executive director of the Rutland County Women's Network and Shelter.
S.C.R. 64. Senate concurrent resolution Senate concurrent resolution congratulating Malcolm S. “Kim” Rode for his leadership of the Vermont Municipal Bone Bank and the Vermont Educational and Health Building Financing Agency
[The full text of the concurrent resolutions appeared in the Senate and House Calendar Addendum on the preceding legislative day and will appear in the volume of the Public Acts and Resolves of the 2004 Adjourned session of the sixty-seventh adjourned session]