Journal of the House
________________
WEDNESDAY, MAY 7, 2003
At one o'clock in the afternoon the Speaker called the House to order.
Devotional Exercises
Devotional exercises were conducted by Speaker Walter Freed of Dorset.
Message from the Senate No. 61
A message was received from the Senate by Mr. Marshall, its Assistant Secretary, as follows:
Mr. Speaker:
I am directed to inform the House that pursuant to the request of the House for a Committee of Conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on House bill entitled:
H. 453. An act relating to tort claims against municipal employees.
The President announced the appointment as members of such Committee on the part of the Senate:
Senator Bloomer
Senator Sears
Senator Leddy
The Governor has informed the Senate that on the sixth day of May, 2003, he approved and signed a bill originating in the Senate of the following title:
S. 173. An act relating to prohibition of cigarette sales.
Joint Resolution Adopted
J.R.H. 19
Joint resolution, entitled
Joint resolution in support of construction of segments A-B of the Chittenden County Circumferential Highway;
Was taken up and adopted on the part of the House.
Proposal of Amendment Agreed to; Bill Read the Third Time
and Passed in Concurrence with Proposals of Amendment
S. 25
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to motor vehicle passenger safety;
Was taken up and pending third reading of the bill, Rep. Hall of Newport City moved the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as follows:
In Sec. 1, 23 V.S.A. § 1258(b), by adding a subdivision (b)(3) to read:
(3) the total number of persons being transported exceeds the number of safety belts, so long as all safety belts are being utilized.
Which was disagreed to.
Pending third reading of the bill, Reps. Nitka of Ludlow, Kennedy of Chelsea, Lavoie of Swanton, and Peterson of Williston moved the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as follows:
In Sec. 1, by striking 23 V.S.A. § 1258(a) (2) and (3) and by inserting in lieu the following:
(2) a child weighing more than 20 pounds, or who is one year of age or older and under the age of five years, shall be restrained in a child passenger restraining system; and
(3) a child five through 15 years of age shall be restrained in a safety belt system or a child passenger restraining system.
Which was disagreed to.
Pending third reading of the bill, Reps. Peterson of Williston and LaVoie of Swanton moved the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as follows:
First: In Sec. 1, by striking 23 V.S.A. § 1258(a) (2) and (3) and inserting in lieu the following:
(2) a child under age eight, who is not subject to subdivision (1), and is under the height of 57 inches, shall be restrained in a child passenger restraining system; and;
(3) a child under age 16, who is not subject to subdivisions (1) or (2) of this section shall be restrained in a child passenger restraining system or a safety belt system.
Second: By adding a new Sec.1a. to read:
Sec. 1a. TRANSITIONAL ENFORCEMENT
Until January 1, 2005, violations of 23 V.S.A.§ 1258(a) limited to a child ages five, six, or seven who is not restrained by a child passenger restraining system shall only be subject to a warning
Which was disagreed to.
Pending third reading of the bill, Rep. Allaire of Rutland City moved the House propose to the Senate to amend the bill as follows:
In Sec. 1, by striking 23 V.S.A. § 1258(a) (1) and (2), and inserting in lieu the following:
(1) all children under the age of one, and all children weighing less than 20 pounds, regardless of age, shall be restrained in a rear-facing position, properly secured in a federally-approved child passenger restraining system, which shall not be installed in front of an active air bag;
(2) a child weighing more than 20 pounds, and who is one year of age or older and under the age of eight years, shall be restrained in a child passenger restraining system; and
Which was agreed to.
Thereupon, the bill was read the third time.
Pending the question, Shall the bill pass? Rep. Donahue of Northfield demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the bill pass? was decided in the affirmative. Yeas, 98. Nays, 38.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Adams of Hartland
Allaire of Rutland City
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bailey of Hyde Park
Bohi of Hartford
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Brown of Walden
Carey of Chester
Chen of Mendon
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Connell of Warren
Corcoran of Bennington
Crawford of Burke
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
DePoy of Rutland City
Donaghy of Poultney
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Edwards of Brattleboro
Emmons of Springfield
Endres of Milton
Errecart of Shelburne
Flory of Pittsford
French of Randolph
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Gray of Barre Town
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hingtgen of Burlington
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hummel of Underhill
Hunt of Essex
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Johnson of Canaan
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kennedy of Chelsea
Kenyon of Bradford
Keogh of Burlington
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Kirker of Essex
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larson of Burlington
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Marron of Stowe
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
Mazur of South Burlington
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Miller of Shaftsbury
Miller of Elmore
Molloy of Arlington
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Nease of Johnson
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Peaslee of Guildhall
Pelham of Calais
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Pugh of South Burlington
Rodgers of Glover
Rusten of Halifax
Schiavone of Shelburne
Seibert of Norwich
Severance of Colchester
Shand of Weathersfield
Shaw of Derby
Smith of Morristown
Starr of Troy
Sweaney of Windsor
Towne of Berlin
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Valliere of Barre City
Vincent of Waterbury
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Wright of Burlington
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allard of St. Albans Town
Anderson of Woodstock
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Branagan of Georgia
Clark of Vergennes
Crowley of West Rutland
Donahue of Northfield
Duffy of Rutland City
Fallar of Tinmouth
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Larocque of Barnet
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
McAllister of Highgate
Nitka of Ludlow
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Reese of Pomfret
Robinson of Richmond
Rogers of Castleton
Sharpe of Bristol
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Symington of Jericho
Waite of Pawlet
Winters of Williamstown
Young of Orwell
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Amidon of Charlotte
Bolduc of Barton
Brennan of Colchester
Dunsmore of Georgia
Fisher of Lincoln
Kainen of Hartford
Larrabee of Danville
Metzger of Milton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Monti of Barre City
Nuovo of Middlebury
Webster of Randolph
Wood of Brandon
Rep. Donahue of Northfield explained her vote as follows:
“Mr. Speaker:
I am glad for those in our state who can afford multiple car seats and large cars. I vote no on behalf of our many citizens who cannot.”
Rep. Young of Orwell explained his vote as follows:
“Mr. Speaker:
I have a clean low mileage eight passenger Chevrolet Suburban that will soon be coming off lease. Is anyone interested?”
Message from Governor
A message was received from His Excellency, the Governor, by Mr. Neale Lunderville, Secretary of Civil and Military Affairs, as follows:
Mr. Speaker:
I am directed by the Governor to inform the House that on the sixth day of May, 2003, he approved and signed a bill originating in the House of the following title:
H. 44 An act to permit the sale and use of sparklers
Third Reading; Bill Passed in Concurrence
With Proposal of Amendment
S. 93
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect;
Pending third reading of the bill, Reps. Nease of Johnson, Larson of Burlington and Pugh of South Burlington moved to propose to the Senate to amend the bill as follows:
In Sec. 3, § 4913(a), by striking the following: “, while acting in his or her capacity as such,”
Thereupon, Rep. Nease of Johnson asked and was granted leave of the House to withdraw his amendment.
Thereupon, the bill was read the third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment.
Third Reading; Bill Passed in Concurrence
With Proposal of Amendment
S. 15
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to a juvenile justice legislative oversight committee
Pending third reading of the bill, Reps. Nease of Johnson and Larson of Burlington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment as follows:
In Sec. 5, section 7041 of 13 V.S.A., by striking subsection (b) in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof a new subsection (b) to read as follows:
(b) Upon violation of the terms of probation or of the deferred sentence
agreement, the court shall impose sentence. Upon fulfillment of the terms of
probation and of the deferred sentence agreement, the court shall strike the
adjudication of guilt and discharge the respondent, except that a
person shall not be discharged from probation imposed under this section until
restitution has been paid in full, absent a finding of good cause by the court.
Upon discharge the record of the criminal proceedings shall be expunged as if
an application pursuant to section 5538 of Title 33 had been granted, except
that the record shall not be expunged until restitution has been paid in full,
absent a finding of good cause by the court.
Which was agreed to.
Pending the question, Shall the bill be read the third time? Rep. Hingtgen of Burlington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment as follows:
First: in Sec. 7, subsection 7282(a) of 13 V.S.A., by striking subdivision (5) in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof a new subdivision (5) to read as follows:
(5)(A) $20.50 for any offense committed after June 30, 2001, of which $13.50 shall be deposited into a special fund account to be known as the victims’ compensation fund, and $2.00 shall be deposited into the criminal justice training council special fund established in section 2363 of Title 20; and
(B) an amount equal to 15 percent of the fine imposed for the offense, rounded upward to the nearest whole dollar, which shall be deposited into the crime victims’ restitution special fund established by section 5363 of Title 13.
Second: in Sec. 7, subsection 7282(a) of 13 V.S.A., by striking subdivision (6) in its entirety.
Which was agreed to.
Thereupon, the bill was read the third time and passed in concurrence with proposals of amendment.
Bill Amended, Read Third Time and Passed
H. 394
House bill, entitled
An act relating to exempting snowmobile trails from Act 250 jurisdiction;
Was taken up and pending third reading of the bill, Rep. Nitka of Ludlow moved to amend the bill as follows:
First: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3)(D)(iii), in the first sentence, by striking the following: “The past, present, or future construction and maintenance of a
portion of a statewide trails system,” and inserting in lieu thereof, “The construction of, improvements, or maintenance of any portion of a statewide trail system on a tract of land not currently under the jurisdiction of this chapter and”
Second: by adding a new Sec. 2 to read:
Sec. 2, 10 V.S.A. § 6001(30) is added to read:
“(30) “Statewide trail system” means the Appalachian Trail, the Catamount Trail, the Long Trail System and the Vermont Association of Snow Travelers’ Trail System.”
Which was agreed to. Thereupon, the bill was read the third time and passed.
Pursuant to rule 41, the title of the bill was amended to read as follows:
AN ACT RELATING TO EXEMPTING CERTAIN TRAILS FROM ACT 250 JURISDICTION;
Bill Amended; Third Reading Ordered
H. 327
Rep. Dakin of Colchester, for the committee on Commerce, to which had been referred House bill, entitled
An act relating to identity theft;
Reported in favor of its passage when amended as by striking all after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Sec. 1. 9 V.S.A. § 2480a is amended to read:
§ 2480a. DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this subchapter:
(1) “Consumer” means a natural person residing in this state.
(2) “Credit report” means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a credit reporting agency bearing on a consumer’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living, including an investigative credit report. The term does not include:
(A) a report containing information solely as to transactions or experiences between the consumer and the person making the report; or
(B) an authorization or approval of a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly by the issuer of a credit card or similar device.
(3) “Credit reporting agency” or “agency” means any person which, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages in whole or in part in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of reporting to third parties on the credit rating or creditworthiness of any consumer.
(4) “Identity theft” means the unauthorized use of another person’s personal identifying information to obtain credit, goods, services, money, or property with the intent to commit fraud or pose as that person.
(4)(5) “Investigative credit
report” means a report in which information on a consumer’s character, general
reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living is obtained through
personal interviews with neighbors, friends, or associates of the consumer
reported on or with others with whom the consumer is acquainted or who may have
knowledge concerning any such items of information. The term does not include
reports of specific factual information on a consumer’s credit record obtained
directly from a creditor of the consumer or from a credit reporting agency when
such information was obtained directly from a creditor of the consumer or from
the consumer.
(6) “Proper identification,” as used in this subchapter, means that information generally deemed sufficient to identify a person.
(7) “Security alert” means a notice placed in a consumer’s credit report, at the request of the consumer, that notifies a recipient of the credit report that the consumer’s identity may have been used without the consumer’s consent to fraudulently obtain credit, goods, services, money, or property in the consumer’s name.
Sec. 2. 9 V.S.A. § 2480b(c) is amended to read:
(c) Any time a credit reporting agency is required to make a written disclosure to consumers pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681g, it shall disclose the following:
“NOTICE TO VERMONT CONSUMERS
* * *
(3) If you
believe a law regulating consumer credit reporting has been violated, you may
file a complaint with the Vermont Attorney General’s Consumer Assistance
Program, 104 Morrill Hall, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405.
Telephone number (800) 649-2424 or, in Chittenden County, 649-2424 656-3183.”
Rights of Consumers Who Are Victims of ID Theft.
Security Alerts:
You have a right to place a “security alert” in your credit report, which will warn anyone who receives information in your credit report that your identity may have been used without your consent and that recipients of your credit report are advised, but not required, to verify your identity prior to issuing credit. The security alert may prevent credit, loans, and services from being approved in your name without your consent. However, you should be aware that taking advantage of this right may delay or interfere with the timely approval of any subsequent request or application you make regarding a new loan, credit, mortgage, insurance, rental housing, employment, investment, license, cellular phone, utilities, digital signature, internet credit card transaction, or other services, including an extension of credit at point of sale. If you place a security alert on your credit report, you have a right to obtain a free copy of your credit report at the time the 90-day security alert period, or any renewal thereof, expires. A security alert may be requested by calling the following toll-free telephone number: (INSERT APPLICABLE TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER).
Sec. 3. 9 V.S.A. §§ 2480h - 2480m are added to read:
(a) A consumer may elect to place a security alert in his or her credit report by making a request in writing or by telephone to a consumer credit reporting agency. “Security alert” means a notice placed in a consumer’s credit report, at the request of the consumer, that notifies a recipient of the credit report that the consumer’s identity may have been used without the consumer’s consent to fraudulently obtain credit, goods, services, money, or property in the consumer’s name.
(b) A consumer credit reporting agency shall notify each person requesting consumer credit information with respect to a consumer of the existence of a security alert in the credit report of that consumer, regardless of whether a full credit report, credit score, or summary report is requested.
(c) Each consumer credit reporting agency shall maintain a toll-free telephone number to accept security alert requests from consumers 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
(d) The toll-free telephone number shall be included in any written disclosure by a consumer credit reporting agency to any consumer pursuant to subsection 2480b(c) of this title and shall be printed in a clear and conspicuous manner.
(e) A consumer credit reporting agency shall place a security alert on a consumer’s credit report no later than five business days after receiving a request from the consumer.
(f) The security alert shall remain in place for at least 90 days, and a consumer shall have the right to request renewals of the security alert. Each renewal shall remain in place for at least 90 days.
§ 2480i. CREDIT REPORTING AGENCY DUTIES IF SECURITY ALERT IN PLACE
If a consumer has placed a security alert, a consumer credit reporting agency shall provide the consumer, upon request, with a free copy of his or her credit report at the time the 90-day security alert period, or any renewal thereof, expires.
§ 2480j. ENTITIES NOT REQUIRED TO PLACE A SECURITY ALERT
The following entities are not required to place in a credit report a security alert pursuant to section 2480h of this title.
(1) A check services company, which issues authorizations for the purpose of approving or processing negotiable instruments, electronic fund transfers, or similar methods of payment.
(2) A demand deposit account information service company, which issues reports regarding account closures due to fraud, substantial overdrafts, automated teller machine (ATM) abuse, or similar negative information regarding a consumer to inquiring banks or other financial institutions for use only in reviewing a consumer request for a demand deposit account at the inquiring bank or financial institution.
§ 2480k. DELETION OF CREDIT REPORT INQUIRIES INITIATED AS A
RESULT OF IDENTITY THEFT
A consumer credit reporting agency shall delete from a consumer credit report inquiries for credit reports based upon credit requests that the consumer credit reporting agency verifies were initiated as the result of identity theft, as defined in section 2480a of this title.
§ 2480l. SWORN COMPLAINTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
A person who has learned or reasonably suspects that his or her personal identifying information has been unlawfully used by another, as described in subsection 2029(a) of Title 13, may make a written complaint about the unlawful use of personal identifying information to a law enforcement agency that has jurisdiction over his or her actual residence. The complaint shall be made under oath. The law enforcement agency shall provide the complainant with a copy of the sworn complaint, the name of the law enforcement officer taking the complaint, and an incident number or case number assigned to the complaint by the law enforcement agency. If the suspected crime was committed in a different jurisdiction, the law enforcement agency shall refer the complaint to a law enforcement agency in that different jurisdiction.
§ 2480m. VERIFICATION OF CHANGE OF CONSUMER’S ADDRESS
FOR PREAPPROVED OFFERS OF CREDIT
(a) A credit card issuer that mails an offer or solicitation to receive a credit card and, in response, receives a completed application for a credit card that lists an address that is different from the address on the offer or solicitation shall verify the change of address by contacting the person to whom the solicitation or offer was mailed.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person to whom an offer or solicitation to receive a credit card is made shall not be liable for the unauthorized use of a credit card issued in response to that offer or solicitation if the credit card issuer does not verify the change of address pursuant to subsection (a) of this section prior to the issuance of the credit card, unless the credit card issuer proves that this person actually incurred the charge on the credit card.
(c) When a credit card issuer receives a written or oral request for a change of the cardholder’s billing address and then receives a written or oral request for an additional credit card within 10 days after the requested address change, the credit card issuer shall not mail the requested additional credit card to the new address or, alternatively, activate the requested additional credit card unless the credit card issuer has verified the change of address.
Sec. 4. 13 V.S.A. § 2029 is added to read:
§ 2029. IDENTITY THEFT
(a) No person shall knowingly obtain, produce, possess, use, sell, give, or transfer personal identifying information belonging or pertaining to another person without the consent of the other person and with intent to use the information to commit or facilitate any crime.
(b) No person shall knowingly obtain, produce, possess, use, sell, give, or transfer personal identifying information belonging or pertaining to another person without the consent of the other person, thereby knowingly facilitating the use of the information by a third person to commit or facilitate any crime.
(c) For the purposes of this section, “personal identifying information” includes name, address, birth date, Social Security number, driver’s license number, telephone number, financial services account number, savings account number, checking account number, credit card number, debit card number, identification document or false identification document, electronic identification number, educational record, health care record, financial record, credit record, employment record, e-mail address, computer system password, mother’s maiden name, or similar personal number, record, or information.
(d) A person who violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more than three years or fined not more $3,000.00, or both. A person who violates this section knowing that the victim is a person 18 years of age or older who has a diagnosed physical or mental impairment or a person who is 60 years of age or older shall be imprisoned for not more than five years or fined not more than $5,000.00, or both. A person who commits a second or subsequent violation of this section shall be imprisoned for not more than ten years or fined not more than $10,000.00, or both.
Sec. 5. REPORT ON THE CALIFORNIA SECURITY FREEZE LAW AND
VERMONT IDENTITY THEFT
Within one year of the effective date of this act, the office of the attorney general shall report to the House Committee on Commerce on the performance, effectiveness, and problems of the California security freeze law and the impact of identity theft on Vermonters, including the number and result of complaints and criminal cases.
The bill, having appeared on the Calendar one day for notice, was taken up, read the second time, report of the committee on Commerce agreed to and third reading ordered.
Bills Messaged to Senate Forthwith
On motion of Rep. Symington of Jericho, the rules were suspended and the following bills were ordered messaged to the Senate forthwith:
H. 394
House bill, entitled
An act relating to exempting certain trails from Act 250 jurisdiction;
S. 15
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to a juvenile justice legislative oversight committee
S. 25
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to motor vehicle passenger safety;
S. 93
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect;
At three and five minutes in the afternoon, on motion of Rep. Houston of Ferrisburgh, the House adjourned until tomorrow at one o’clock in the afternoon.