Journal of the House
________________
THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2003
At nine o'clock and thirty minutes in the forenoon the Speaker called the House to order.
Devotional Exercises
Devotional exercises were conducted by Reverend Roberta Hodge of the Free Methodist Church, Burlington.
Message from the Senate No. 44
A message was received from the Senate by Mr. Marshall, its Assistant Secretary, as follows:
Mr. Speaker:
I am directed to inform the House that the Senate has on its part passed Senate bills of the following titles:
S. 81. An act relating to membership on the capital debt affordability advisory committee.
S. 92. An act relating to the comprehensive revision and reorganization of the law with respect to the adoption and implementation of municipal bylaws.
S. 125. An act relating to charitable gifts of life insurance.
S. 182. An act relating to identifying living modified organisms intended for intentional introduction into the environment.
In the passage of which the concurrence of the House is requested.
Joint Resolution Referred to Committee
J.R.H. 14
Reps. Obuchowski of Rockingham, Aswad of Burlington, Brooks of Montpelier, Cross of Winooski, Darrow of Dummerston, Deen of Westminster, Donovan of Burlington, Dostis of Waterbury, Edwards of Brattleboro, Gervais of Enosburg, Johnson of South Hero, Keenan of St. Albans City, Kiss of Burlington, Larson of Burlington, Marek of Newfane, Martin of Springfield, Milkey of Brattleboro, Partridge of Windham, Pillsbury of Brattleboro, Rusten of Halifax, Sharpe of Bristol, Tracy of Burlington and Zuckerman of Burlington offered a joint resolution, entitled
Joint resolution directing the public service board and department of public service and the Vermont state nuclear advisory panel (VSNAP) to review the issues related to relicensing the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant;
Whereas, the Entergy Nuclear corporation operates the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon under a 40‑year federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission license which expires in 2012, and
Whereas, as the plant’s licensing period draws to a close, the citizens of Vermont, especially in Windham County, are engaged in a serious examination concerning the facility’s future, specifically whether Vermont Yankee’s operating license should be extended, and if so, for how long, and
Whereas, the future of Vermont Yankee is one of the most important issues confronting the state as it encompasses broad public policy questions related to Vermont’s economy, the source and cost of the state’s electric power supply, the environment, and public safety, and
Whereas, the licensing period’s expiration occurs at approximately the same time as the state’s electric power contract with HydroQuebec concludes, meaning that during the coming decade, Vermont will be required to reach fundamental decisions regarding electric power generation, and
Whereas, more specifically, the disposition of spent radioactive nuclear fuel rods and their storage on site for the foreseeable future, the tightness and durability of Vermont Yankee’s containment structure, the effect of the plant’s discharged water on the Connecticut River, the cost‑effectiveness and availability of alternative, including renewable, energy resources, and the economic impact of relicensing on the town of Vernon and surrounding communities should all be part of the public policy evaluation, and
Whereas, the voters of many Windham County communities expressed their opinions on this important issue during their individual municipalities’ 2003 town meetings, and
Whereas, the results of this vote can be interpreted as either an endorsement for relicensing with 1,429 supporting a new license in 2012 and 1,179 opposing a new license in 2012, or as a call to find a replacement energy source as only five of the 16 towns which conducted a nonbinding referendum on this issue supported relicensing the plant in 2012, and
Whereas, the ultimate decision regarding Vermont Yankee’s future requires careful expert examination of all the local, state, and regional issues related to the plant’s future, and
Whereas, the public service board, the department of public service and the Vermont state nuclear advisory panel (VSNAP) are best equipped to conduct thoroughly the inquiry, now therefore be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives:
That the public service board, the department of public service, and the Vermont state nuclear advisory panel shall conduct a joint study to review in a comprehensive and objective manner the issues surrounding the future of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, and be it further
Resolved: That the board, the department, and the panel shall submit a report consisting of policy options and their related implications, but no recommendations, to the General Assembly on or before February 1, 2004, and be it further
Resolved: That the Secretary of State be directed to send a copy of this resolution to public service board chair Michael Dworkin and to department of public service commissioner and Vermont state nuclear advisory panel chair David O’Brien.
Which was read and, in the Speaker’s discretion, treated as a bill and referred to the committee on Natural Resources and Energy.
House Bill Introduced
H. 475
Reps. Kiss of Burlington, Aswad of Burlington, Atkins of Winooski, Cross of Winooski, Donovan of Burlington, Hingtgen of Burlington, Keogh of Burlington, Larson of Burlington, Tracy of Burlington, Wright of Burlington and Zuckerman of Burlington introduced a bill, entitled
An act relating to amending the charter of the City of Burlington;
Which was read the first time and referred to the committee on Local Government.
Senate Bills Referred
Senate bills of the following titles were severally taken up, read the first time and referred as follows:
S. 81
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to membership on the capital debt affordability advisory committee;
To the committee on Institutions.
S. 92
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to the comprehensive revision and reorganization of the law with respect to the adoption and implementation of municipal bylaws;
To the committee on Natural Resources and Energy.
S. 125
Senate bill, entitled
An act relating to charitable gifts of life insurance;
To the committee on Commerce.
Bill Read Second Time; Third Reading Ordered
H. 471
Rep. McCullough of Williston spoke for the committee on Transportation.
House bill entitled
An act relating to motor vehicles;
Having appeared on the Calendar one day for notice, was taken up, read the second time and third reading ordered.
Bill Read Second Time; Third Reading Ordered
H. 473
Rep. Errecart of Shelburne spoke for the committee on Ways and Means.
House bill entitled
An act relating to taxation of electric generation;
Having appeared on the Calendar one day for notice, was taken up, read the second time and third reading ordered.
Bill Amended; Third Reading Ordered
H. 466
Rep. Young of Orwell spoke for the committee on Commerce.
Rep. Peterson of Williston, for the committee on Ways and Means, to which had been referred House bill, entitled
An act relating to the captive insurance tax;
Reported in favor of its passage when amended as follows:
First: In Sec. 1, 8 V.S.A. § 6014, by striking subsection (c) in its entirety, and inserting in lieu thereof a new subsection (c) to read as follows:
(c) If the aggregate taxes The annual minimum aggregate tax
to be paid by a captive insurance company calculated under subsections (a) and
(b) of this section amount to less than $5,000.00 in any year, such captive
insurance company shall pay a tax of $5,000.00 for such year shall be
$7,500.00, and the annual maximum aggregate tax shall be $200,000.00. The
maximum aggregate tax to be paid by a sponsored insurance company shall
apply to each protected cell only and not to the sponsored captive insurance
company as a whole.
Second: In Sec. 1, 8 V.S.A. § 6014(k), in the first sentence, by striking the word “multilayer” and inserting in lieu thereof “multiyear”
The bill, having appeared on the Calendar one day for notice, was taken up, read the second time, report of the committee on Ways and Means agreed to and third reading ordered.
Consideration Interrupted by Recess
H. 175
Rep. Johnson of Canaan, for the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, to which had been referred House bill, entitled
An act relating to consolidated environmental appeals and revisions of land use development law;
Reported in favor of its passage when amended by striking all after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
* * * Consolidated Environmental Appeals * * *
Sec. 1. 10 V.S.A. chapter 220 is added to read:
Chapter 220. Consolidated Environmental Appeals
§ 8501. PURPOSE
It is the purpose of this chapter to:
(1) consolidate existing appeal routes for acts or decisions of the secretary, district commission, and environmental board, excluding enforcement actions brought pursuant to chapters 201 and 211 of this title and the adoption of rules under chapter 25 of Title 3;
(2) standardize the appeal periods, the parties who may appeal these acts or decisions, and the ability to stay any act or decision upon appeal, taking into account the nature of the different programs affected;
(3) encourage people to get involved in the Act 250 permitting process at the initial stages of review by a district commission by requiring participation as a prerequisite for an appeal of a district commission decision to the environmental court; and
(4) assure that clear appeal routes exist for acts and decisions of the secretary.
§ 8502. DEFINITIONS
As used in this chapter:
(1) “District commission” means a district commission established under chapter 151 of this title.
(2) “Environmental board” means the environmental board established under chapter 151 of this title.
(3) “Environmental court” means the environmental court established under chapter 27 of Title 4.
(4) “Person” means any individual, partnership, company, corporation, association, unincorporated association, joint venture, trust, municipality, the state of Vermont or any agency, department or subdivision of the state, any federal agency, or any other legal or commercial entity.
(5) “Person aggrieved” means any person who the environmental
court determines meets the standard for intervention as of right under the
Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 24(a) who demonstrates an interest which may be
affected by the outcome of the proceeding and who is so situated that the
disposition of the proceeding may as a practical matter impair or impede that
person’s
ability to protect his or her interest.
(6) “Secretary” means the secretary of the agency of natural resources or the secretary’s duly authorized representative. For the purposes of this chapter, “secretary” shall also mean the commissioner of the department of environmental conservation, the commissioner of the department of forests, parks, and recreation, and the commissioner of the department of fish and wildlife, with respect to those statutes that refer to the authority of that commissioner or department.
§ 8503. APPLICABILITY
(a) This chapter shall govern all appeals of an act or decision of the secretary, excluding enforcement actions under chapters 201 and 211 of this title and rulemaking, under the following authorities:
(1) 10 V.S.A. chapter 23 (air pollution control).
(2) 10 V.S.A. § 922 (aquatic nuisance control grants-in-aid).
(3) 10 V.S.A. chapter 41 (regulation of stream flow).
(4) 10 V.S.A. chapter 43 (dams).
(5) 10 V.S.A. chapter 47 (water pollution control).
(6) 10 V.S.A. chapter 48 (groundwater protection).
(7) 10 V.S.A. chapter 53 (beverage containers).
(8) 10 V.S.A. chapter 55 (aid to municipalities for water supply, pollution abatement and sewer separation).
(9) 10 V.S.A. chapter 56 (public water supply).
(10) 10 V.S.A. chapter 59 (underground liquid storage tanks).
(11) 10 V.S.A. chapter 64 (potable water supply and wastewater permit).
(12) 10 V.S.A. chapter § 2625 (regulation of heavy
cutting).
(13) 10 V.S.A. chapter 123 (protection of endangered species).
(14) 10 V.S.A. chapter 159 (waste management).
(15) 29 V.S.A. chapter 11 (management of lakes and ponds).
(b) This chapter shall govern all appeals from an act or decision of a district commission under chapter 151 of this title.
(c) This chapter shall govern all appeals from an act or decision of the environmental board under chapter 151 of this title, excluding enforcement actions under chapters 201 and 211 of this title and rulemaking.
§ 8504. APPEALS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
(a) Any person aggrieved by an act or decision of the secretary, district commission, or environmental board under the provisions of law listed in section 8503 of this title may appeal to the environmental court within 30 days of the date of the act or decision.
(b) Upon filing an appeal from an act or decision of the district commission, the appellant shall notify all parties who had party status as of the end of the district commission proceeding that an appeal is being filed.
(1) No aggrieved person may appeal an act or decision that was made by a district commission unless:
(A) the person is a party pursuant to subdivisions 6085(c)(1)(A) through (D) of this title; or
(B) the person was granted party status by the district commission pursuant to subdivision 6085(c)(1)(E) or (F), participated in the proceedings before the district commission, and retained party status at the end of the district commission proceedings. In addition, the person may only appeal those issues under the criteria with respect to which the person was granted party status.
(2) Notwithstanding subdivision (b)(1) of this section, an aggrieved person may appeal an act or decision of the district commission if the environmental judge determines that:
(A) there was a procedural defect which prevented the person from obtaining party status or participating in the proceeding;
(B) some other condition exists which would result in manifest injustice if the person’s right to appeal was disallowed.
(c) The filing of an appeal shall not automatically stay the act or decision, except for acts or decisions involving stream alteration permits and shoreline encroachment permits issued by the secretary.
(d) The environmental court shall have the authority to grant a stay of any act or decision that has been appealed, upon petition by a party or upon its own motion. In addition, for the purposes of judicial economy, the court may delay the commencement of any appeal or the continued deliberation of any appeal in the event that more than one permit granted for the same project is appealed to the court.
(e) The environmental court shall hold a de novo hearing on those issues which have been appealed, except under the following circumstances:
(1) the act or decision of the secretary or the environmental board was the result of a contested case proceeding, in which case the review shall be on the record; or
(2) the act or decision of the district commission has been conducted as a recorded hearing pursuant to section 6085a of this title, in which case the review shall be on the record.
(f) Any appeal of an authorization to discharge under the terms of a general permit shall be limited in scope to whether the permitted activity complies with the terms and conditions of the general permit.
(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section:
(1) the environmental court shall not hear an appeal of a district commission decision when the commission has issued a permit and no hearing was requested;
(2) a district commission’s decision to grant or deny a motion for a recorded hearing shall not be subject to appeal;
(3) if a district commission issues a partial decision under subsection 6086(b) of this title, any appeal of that decision must be taken within 30 days of the date of that decision.
(h) The secretary and the environmental board may represent themselves in all appeals under this section.
§ 8505. APPEALS TO THE SUPREME COURT
(a) Any person aggrieved by a decision of the environmental court pursuant to this subchapter may appeal to the supreme court within 30 days of the date of the entry of the judgment or order appealed from provided that the person was a party to the appeal before the environmental court.
(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, an aggrieved person may appeal a decision of the environmental court if the supreme court determines that:
(1) there was a procedural defect which prevented the person from participating in the proceeding;
(2) some other condition exists which would result in manifest injustice if the person’s right to appeal was disallowed.
(bc) The
supreme court’s review of the environmental courts decision shall be an on‑the‑record
review.
(cd) An
objection that has not been raised before the environmental court may not be
considered by the supreme court, unless the failure or neglect to raise that
objection is excused by the court because of extraordinary circumstances. The
findings of the environmental court with respect to questions of fact, if
supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, shall be
conclusive.
(e) The secretary and the environmental board may represent themselves in all appeals under this section.
Sec. 2. 3 V.S.A. § 2828 is added to read:
§ 2828. PROJECT SCOPING PROCESS
(a) Applicability. This section shall govern all applications for permits, certifications, or other authorizations, except for professional licenses, issued by the department of environmental conservation or under chapter 151 of this title.
(b) Determining project scope. An applicant for any permit, certification, or other authorization, except for a professional license, issued by the department of environmental conservation or a district environmental commission may request to engage in a project scoping process. If a project scoping request is made, the department of environmental conservation and, if appropriate, the district coordinator shall prepare a project review sheet based on information submitted by the applicant. The project review sheet shall indicate:
(1) a brief description of the project and all permits necessary for the project;
(2) whether a land use permit is required by chapter 151 of this title; and
(3) a project identification number assigned by the secretary, for use on all applications, notices, permits, and decisions issued by the secretary.
(c) Project review sheet. The project review sheet shall be prepared based on the information submitted by the project applicant. If, based on supplemental information, or for other good cause, the secretary determines that a project will require other permits or the district coordinator determines that a land use permit under chapter 151 of this title is required, notwithstanding the fact that the permit requirement did not appear on the initial project review sheet, the project review sheet shall be amended. Any failure by the applicant, secretary, or a district coordinator to identify on the project review sheet a required permit or authorization issued by the secretary, or a land use permit issued under chapter 151 of this title, shall not constitute a waiver of jurisdiction.
(d) Project scoping meeting. If the applicant elects to initiate a project scoping process upon completion of the project review sheet or submittal of the first permit application at either the local or state level, the applicant shall schedule a project scoping meeting.
(e) Notice of project scoping meeting. The applicant shall notice the proposed project scoping meeting, at least 30 days prior to the date of the meeting, by sending a copy of the project review sheet by first class mail, postage prepaid, to each of the following: the owner of the land where the project is located if the applicant is not the owner; the municipality in which the project is located; the municipal and regional planning commissions for any municipality in which the project is located; the municipal and regional planning commissions in any adjacent Vermont municipality if the project is located on a boundary; any state agency identified on the project scoping sheet as being directly affected by the project; and all adjoining landowners and residents. In addition, the applicant shall assure that this notice is published in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the proposed project. The applicant shall furnish by affidavit to the secretary the names of those furnished notice.
(f) Project scoping meeting. The applicant or a representative of the applicant shall be present at the meeting. The following persons should be present at the scoping meeting: the secretary or the secretary’s designee; the district coordinator, if the proposed project will require a land use permit under chapter 151 of this title; and a representative of a local permitting authority or a member of the selectboard of the town in which the project is located, if no local permitting authority exists. At the meeting, the applicant or a representative of the applicant shall present a description of the proposed project, and be available for questions from the public concerning the proposed project. The purpose of the meeting shall be to provide public information and increase notice about the project, allow discussion of the proposed project, and to identify potential issues at the beginning of the project review process. The applicant shall provide copies of the project review sheet to persons attending the meeting.
* * * Enhanced Environmental Court * * *
Sec. 3. 4 V.S.A. § 21a is amended to read:
§ 21a. DUTIES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
(a) The administrative judge shall assign and specially assign superior
and district judges, including himself or herself, and the
environmental judge judges to
the superior, environmental, district and family courts. If the administrative
judge determines that additional judicial time is needed to address cases filed
in environmental court, the judge may assign or specially assign up to four
judges on a part-time basis to the environmental court. When assigning or
specially assigning judges to the environmental court, the administrative judge
shall give consideration to experience and expertise in environmental and
zoning law, and shall assign or specially assign judges in a manner to provide
appropriate attention to all geographic areas of the state. All judges, except for
one of the current environmental court judges,
shall be subject to the requirements of rotation as ordered by the Supreme
Court.
(b) In making any assignment under this section, the administrative judge shall give consideration to the experience, temperament and training of a judge and the needs of the court. In making an assignment to the environmental court, the administrative judge shall give consideration to experience and expertise in environmental and land use law.
Sec. 4. 4 V.S.A. § 22(a) and (b) are amended to read:
(a) The chief justice may appoint and assign a retired justice or judge with his or her consent or a superior judge or district judge to a special assignment on the Supreme Court. The chief justice may appoint and the administrative judge shall assign an active or retired justice or a retired judge, with his or her consent, to any special assignment in the district, family, environmental or superior courts. The administrative judge shall assign a judge to any special assignment in the district, family, environmental or superior court. Preference shall be given to superior judges to sit in superior courts. Preference shall be given to district judges to sit in district courts.
(b) The administrative judge may appoint and assign a member of the Vermont bar residing within the state of Vermont to serve temporarily as:
(1) an acting judge in a district, family, environmental, or superior court;
(2) an acting magistrate; or
(3) an acting hearing officer to hear cases in the judicial bureau.
Sec. 5. 4 V.S.A. § 1001 is amended to read:
§ 1001. ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
(a) An environmental court having statewide jurisdiction is created as a
court of record subject to the authority granted to the supreme court. The
environmental court shall consist of the presiding judge sitting alone two
judges. The period of the assignment of the first, and then of the second, environmental
judge to the environmental court shall be adjusted by the administrative judge
as necessary so that after the first such assignment, no more than one
assignment begins in any calendar year.
(b)(1) One Two
environmental judge judges shall be appointed within the judicial
branch who shall hear matters arising under chapters 23 and 201 and
220 of Title 10 and matters arising under 24 V.S.A. chapter 117 and chapter
61, subchapter 12 in environmental court.
(2) The Until the expiration of
the current term of the current environmental court judge, the current initial
environmental judge shall sit in environmental court full time,
and the other environmental
judge shall sit in environmental court at least two‑thirds of his or her
time. After the initial environmental judge has been replaced, one of the
environmental judges then sitting shall sit in environmental court full time
and the other shall sit in environmental court at least two-thirds of his or
her time.
(c) An environmental judge shall be an
attorney admitted to practice before the Vermont supreme court. An Until
the expiration of the current term of the current environmental judge, the
current environmental judge shall be nominated,
appointed, confirmed, paid, and retained, and shall receive all benefits in the
manner of a superior court judge.
(d) An environmental judge shall be appointed on April 1, for a term of six years or the unexpired portion thereof.
(e)
Evidentiary proceedings in the environmental court shall be held in the county
in which all or a portion of the land which is the subject of the appeal is
located or where the violation is alleged to have occurred, unless the parties
agree to another location; provided however, that the environmental judge
court shall offer expeditious evidentiary hearings so that no such
proceedings are moved to another county to obtain an earlier hearing. Unless
otherwise ordered by the court, all nonevidentiary hearings may be conducted by
telephone using an audio or video tape record. If a party objects to a
telephone hearing, the court may require a personal appearance for good cause.
(f)
The environmental
court shall be provided with a minimum of one
court manager, two staff attorneys, two law clerks, two case managers, two
docket clerks, and two docket clerk stenographers. The
environmental court shall receive the same funding and provisions for security
as provided to county courthouses.
(fg)
The supreme court may enact rules and develop procedures consistent with this
chapter to govern the operation of the environmental court and proceedings in
the court. In adopting these rules, the supreme court shall ensure that the rules
provide for:
(1) expeditious proceedings that give due consideration to the needs of pro se litigants;
(2) the ability of the judge to hold pretrial conferences by telephone;
(3) the use of scheduling orders under the rules of civil procedure in order to limit discovery to that which is necessary for a full and fair determination of the proceeding; and
(4) the appropriate use of site visits by the presiding judge to assist the court in rendering a decision.
* * * Act 250 revisions * * *
Sec. 6. 10 V.S.A. § 6021(a) is amended to read:
(a) An environmental board is created. The board shall consist of nine members appointed in the month of February by the governor, with the advice and consent of the senate, so that alternating four or five appointments expire in each odd numbered year. The members shall be appointed for terms of four years. The governor shall appoint up to five persons, who shall be former water resources board, environmental board, or district commission members, with the advice and consent of the senate, to serve as alternates for board members. Alternates shall be appointed for terms of four years, with initial appointments being staggered. The board chair may assign alternates to sit on specific cases before the board, in situations where fewer than nine board members are available to serve.
Sec. 7. 10 V.S.A. § 6025 is amended to read:
§ 6025. RULES
(a) The
board shall adopt rules under and only to the extent of the authority granted
to agencies by 3 V.S.A., chapter 25, the Vermont Administrative Procedure Act,
to interpret and carry out the provisions of this chapter; however, the board
may not adopt emergency rules. The board may adopt rules, in accordance
with the provisions of chapter 25 of Title 3, in the following areas:
(1) Rules that interpret and carry out the provisions of this chapter,
(b) The including rules may
that establish criteria under which applications for permits under this
chapter may be classified in terms of complexity and significance of impact
under the standards of section 6086(a) of this chapter. In accordance with
that classification the rules may:
(1)(A) provide for simplified
or less stringent procedures than are otherwise required under sections 6083,
6084 and 6085 of this chapter; and
(2)(B) provide for the filing
of notices instead of applications for the permits that would otherwise be
required under section 6081 of this chapter; and
(3)(C) provide a procedure by
which a district commission may authorize a district coordinator to issue a
permit that the district commission has determined under board rules is a minor
application with no undue adverse impact.
(2) Rules governing surface levels of lakes and ponds, which are public waters of Vermont.
(3) Rules regarding classification of the waters of the state, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. chapter 47.
(4) Rules regarding the establishment of water quality standards, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. chapter 47.
(5) Rules regulating the surface use of public waters, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. chapter 49.
(6) Rules regarding the identification of wetlands which are so significant that they merit protection. Any determination that a particular wetland is significant will result from an evaluation of at least the following functions which a wetland serves:
(A) provides temporary water storage for flood water and storm runoff;
(B) contributes to the quality of surface and groundwater through chemical action;
(C) naturally controls the effects of erosion and runoff, filtering silt and organic matter;
(D) contributes to the viability of fisheries by providing spawning, feeding, and general habitat for freshwater fish;
(E) provides habitat for breeding, feeding, resting, and shelter to both game and nongame species of wildlife;
(F) provides stopover habitat for migratory birds;
(G) provides for hydrophytic vegetation habitat;
(H) provides for threatened and endangered species habitat;
(I) provides valuable resources for education and research in natural sciences;
(J) provides direct and indirect recreational value and substantial economic benefits; and
(K) contributes to the open-space character and overall beauty of the landscape.
(7) rules regarding petitions, including petitions on the board’s own motion, to designate specific wetlands as significant, when considered under the criteria established in subdivision (6) of this subsection;
(8) Adopt rules protecting wetlands that have been determined under subdivision (6) or (7) of this subsection to be significant, including rules that provide for the issuance or denial of conditional use determinations by the department of environmental conservation; provided, however, that the rules may only protect the values and functions sought to be preserved by the designation. The board shall not adopt rules that restrain agricultural activities without the consent of the commissioner of the department of agriculture, food and markets and shall not adopt rules that restrain silvicultural activities without the consent of the commissioner of the department of forests, parks and recreation.
(c)(1)(b)(1) This subsection shall
apply to lots within a subdivision:
(A) that
were created as part of a subdivision owned or controlled by a person who may
have been required to obtain a permit under this chapter,; and
(B) with
respect to which a determination has been made that a permit was needed under
this chapter,; and
(C) that were sold to a purchaser prior to January 1, 1991 without a required permit.
(2) The rules shall provide for a modified process by which the sole purchaser, or the group of purchasers, of one or more lots to which this subsection applies may apply for and obtain a permit under this chapter that shall be issued in light of the existing improvements, facts, and circumstances that pertain to the lots; provided, however, that the requirements of this chapter shall be modified only to the extent needed to issue those permits. For purposes of these rules, a purchaser eligible for relief under this subsection must not have been involved in creating the lots, must not be a person who owned or controlled the land when it was divided or partitioned, as a person is defined in this chapter, and must not have known at the time of purchase that the transfer was subject to a permit requirement that had not been met.
(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of
subsection (a) of this section, the board may adopt emergency rules under this
subsection. Notwithstanding the provisions of 3 V.S.A. chapter 25, the
board may adopt emergency rules under this subsection that these emergency
rules may remain in effect for 180 days, before they must be replaced by
permanent rules.
Sec. 8. 10 V.S.A. § 6027(h) is added to read:
(h) The board may hear petitions for permit revocation, petitions for outstanding resource waters designation, petitions for wetlands reclassification, appeals of application fee refund requests, as well as appeals from district coordinator jurisdictional opinions through petitions for declaratory rulings. The board shall not hear appeals of district commission permitting decisions.
Sec. 9. 10 V.S.A. § 6046(b) is amended to read:
(b) After approval by the governor, plans
pursuant to section 6042 of this title shall be submitted to the general
assembly when next in session for approval. A plan shall be considered adopted
for the purposes of section 6086(a)(9) of this title when adopted by the act of
the general assembly. No permit shall be issued or denied by a district
commission or environmental board which is contrary to or inconsistent
with a local plan, capital program or municipal bylaw governing land use unless
it is shown and specifically found that the proposed use will have a
substantial impact or effect on surrounding towns, the region or an overriding
interest of the state and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens and
residents thereof requires otherwise.
Sec. 10. 10 V.S.A. § 6083 is amended to read:
§ 6083. APPLICATIONS
* * *
(b) The board
and district commission may conduct such investigations, examinations,
tests and site evaluations, as they deem necessary to verify information
contained in the application. An applicant shall grant the board or
district commission, or their its agents, permission to enter
upon his the applicant’s land for these purposes.
* * *
(d) The board
and commissions shall make all practical efforts to process permits in a
prompt manner. The board shall establish time limits for permit processing as
well as procedures and time periods within which to notify applicants whether
an application is complete. The board shall report annually by February 15 to
the house and senate committees on natural resources and energy and government
operations. The annual report shall assess the performance of the board and
commissions in meeting the limits; identify areas which hinder effective
performance; list fees collected for each permit; summarize changes made by the
board to improve performance; describe staffing needs for the coming year; and
certify that the revenue from the fees collected is at least equal to the costs
associated with those positions.
* * *
(g)(1) A district commission, pending resolution of noncompliance, may stay the issuance of a permit or amendment if it finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that a person who is an applicant:
(A) is not in compliance with a court order, an administrative order, or an assurance of discontinuance with respect to a violation that is directly related to the activity which is the subject of the application; or
(B) has one or more current violations of this chapter, or any rules, permits, assurances of discontinuance, court order, or administrative orders related to this chapter, which, when viewed together, constitute substantial noncompliance.
(2)
Any decision under this subsection to issue a stay may be subject to an
interlocutory appeal to the board environmental court.
(3) If the same violation is the subject of an enforcement action under chapter 201 of this title, then jurisdiction over the issuance of a stay shall remain with the environmental court and shall not reside with the district commission.
Sec. 11. 10 V.S.A. § 6083a is amended to read:
§ 6083a. FEES
* * *
(d) All
persons filing a petition for permit revocation, petition for
outstanding resource waters designation, petition for wetlands
reclassification, an appeal of application fee fund request, or an
appeal, cross appeal or petition to the board from a district
environmental commission decision or jurisdictional determination district
coordinator’s jurisdictional opinion, through a petition for a declaratory
ruling, shall pay a fee of $100.00, plus any associated publication
costs.
* * *
(g) A
commission or the board may require any permittee to file a
certification of actual construction costs and may direct the payment of a
supplemental fee in the event that an application understated a project’s
construction costs. Failure to file a certification or to pay a supplemental
fee shall be grounds for permit revocation.
Sec. 12. 10 V.S.A. § 6084(b) is amended to read:
(b) The district commission shall forward
notice and a copy of the application to the board and any state agency
directly affected, the solid waste management district in which the land is
located, if the development or subdivision constitutes a facility pursuant to
subdivision 6602(10) of this title, and any other municipality, state agency,
or person the district commission or board deems appropriate. Notice
shall also be published in a local newspaper generally circulating in the area
where the land is located not more than 7 seven days after
receipt of the application.
Sec. 13. 10 V.S.A. § 6085 is amended to read:
§ 6085. HEARINGS; PARTY STATUS
(a) Anyone required to receive notice by section 6084 of this title and any adjoining property owner may request a hearing by filing a request within 15 days of receipt of notice. Upon receipt of notice the district commission shall treat the application pursuant to section 814 of Title 3. The district commission may order a hearing without a request within 20 days of receipt of the application.
(b) The hearing or a prehearing conference shall be held within 40 days of receipt of the application or notice of appeal. The parties shall be given not less than 10 days notice. Notice shall also be published in a local newspaper generally circulating in the area where the land is located not less than 10 days before the hearing date.
(c)(1) Parties
shall be those who have received notice, adjoining property owners who have
requested a hearing, and such other persons as the board may allow by rule.
For the purposes of appeal to the supreme court, only the applicant, the
landowner if the applicant is not the landowner, a state agency, the regional
and municipal planning commissions and the municipalities required to receive
notice shall be considered parties. An adjoining property owner may
participate in hearings and present evidence only to the extent the proposed
development or subdivision will have a direct effect on his or her property
under section 6086(a)(1) through (a)(10) of this title. In proceedings
before the board and district commissions, the following persons shall be entitled
to party status:
(A) The applicant;
(B) The landowner, if the applicant is not the landowner;
(C) The municipality in which the project site is located, and the municipal and regional planning commissions for that municipality; and if the project site is located on a boundary, any Vermont municipality adjacent to that border and the municipal and regional planning commissions for that municipality; and the solid waste management district in which the land is located, if the development or subdivision constitutes a facility pursuant to section 6602(10) of Title 10;
(D) Any state agency directly affected by the proposed project, and any state agency receiving notice of the proceedings through the interagency Act 250 review committee;
(E) Any adjoining property owner who requests a hearing, or who requests the right to be heard by entering an appearance on or before the first prehearing conference or, if no prehearing conference is held, the first day of a hearing that has previously been scheduled, to the extent that the adjoining property owner demonstrates that the proposed development or subdivision may have a direct effect on the adjoiner’s property under the relevant criteria for the proceeding involved, or under any of the 10 criteria listed at subsection 6086(a) of this title; and
(F) Any person who
demonstrates an interest which may be affected by the outcome of the proceeding
and who is so situated that the disposition of the proceeding may as a
practical matter impair or impede the applicant’s person’s ability
to protect that interest, unless the person’s interest is adequately
represented by existing parties.
(2) Content of Petitions. All persons seeking to participate in proceedings before the board or district commission as parties pursuant to subdivision (c)(1)(E) or (F) of this section must petition for party status. Any petition for party status may be made orally or in writing to the district commission and shall be made in writing to the board, unless waived by the chair. All petitions must include:
(A) A detailed statement of the petitioner’s interest under the relevant criteria of the proceeding, including, if known, whether the petitioner’s position is in support of or in opposition to the relief sought by the permit applicant, appellant, or petitioner; and
(B) In the case of an organization, a description of the organization, its purposes, and the nature of its membership
membership
and its purposes; and
(C) A statement of the reasons the petitioner believes the board or district commission should allow the petitioner party status in the pending proceeding.
(D) In the case of an adjoining property owner:
(i) A description of the location of the adjoining property in relation to the proposed project, including a map, if available;
(ii) A description of the potential effect of the proposed project upon the adjoiner’s property with respect to each of the relevant criteria or subcriteria under which party status is being requested.
(E) In the case of a person seeking party status under subdivision (c)(1)(F) of this section:
(i) If applicable, a description of the location of the petitioner’s property in relation to the proposed project, including a map, if available;
(ii) A description of the potential effect of the proposed project upon the petitioner’s interest with respect to each of the relevant criteria or subcriteria under which party status is being requested.
(3) Timeliness. A petition for party status pursuant to subdivision (c)(1)(E) or (F) of this section must be made at or prior to an initial prehearing conference held pursuant to board rule, or at the commencement of the hearing, whichever shall occur first, unless the board or district commission, within their respective jurisdictions, directs otherwise. The board or district commission, within their respective jurisdictions, may grant an untimely petition if it finds that the petitioner has demonstrated good cause for failure to request party status in a timely fashion, and that the late appearance will not unfairly delay the proceedings or place an unfair burden on the parties.
(4) Conditions. Where a person has been granted party status pursuant to subdivision (c)(1)(E) or (F) of this section, the board or district commission, within their respective jurisdictions, shall restrict the person’s participation to only those issues in which it has demonstrated an interest, and may encourage the person to join with other persons with respect to representation, presentation of evidence, or other matters in the interest of promoting judicial expediency. A person who has been granted party status as an adjoining property owner may participate in the hearings and present evidence only to the extent the proposed project will have a direct effect on the person’s property under any provision of subsection 6086(a) of this title, or under the relevant criteria of the proceeding involved.
(5) Amicus Curiae. The board or district commission, on its own
motion or by petition, may appoint amicus curiae to participate in a any
of its proceedings.
Participation may be limited to the filing of memoranda, proposed findings of
fact and conclusions of law, and argument on legal issues. However, if
approved by the board or the district commission, participation may be expanded
to include the provision of testimony, the filing of evidence, or the cross
examination of witnesses. A petition for leave to participate as amicus curiae
shall identify the interest of the petitioner and the desired scope of
participation and shall state the reasons why the participation of the
petitioner will be beneficial to the board or the district commission. Except
where all parties consent, or as otherwise ordered by the board or district
commissions, in their respective proceedings
or their respective chairs, all amicus curiae shall file their memoranda,
testimony, or evidence within the times allowed other parties.
(2)(6) A district commission,
according to the procedures established in the rules of the board, shall
determine party status with respect to individuals and organizations at the
commencement of the hearing process and shall re‑examine those
party status determinations before the close of hearings and state the
results of that re-examination in the district commission decision. In the
re-examination of party status coming before the close of district commission
hearings, persons having attained party status up to that point in the
proceedings shall be presumed to retain party status. However, on motion of a
party, or on its own motion, a commission shall consider the extent to which
parties continue to qualify for party status. Determinations made before the
close of district commission hearings shall supersede any preliminary
determinations of party status.
* * *
Sec. 14. 10 V.S.A. § 6085a is amended to read:
§ 6085a. PILOT PROJECT REGARDING APPEALS ON THE RECORD FROM DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION DETERMINATIONS
(a) At the time of
application, the applicant may file a motion for recorded hearings, which
provides that any appeal to the board environmental court will
consist of a review on that record.
(b) In the absence of a
motion for recorded hearings properly filed by an applicant with the filing of
a complete application and, within ten calendar days of the date that a district
commission provides notice of a hearing under section 6084 of this title, any
statutory party or any prospective party may file a motion for recorded
hearings which provides that any appeal to the board environmental
court will consist of a review on that record.
(c) Within ten calendar days of its receipt of a motion for recorded hearings properly filed by an applicant or a prospective party and the receipt of a complete application, the commission shall provide notice of the motion. If necessary, the commission shall cancel any previously scheduled hearings, and the commission shall schedule a prehearing conference. The purpose of the prehearing conference includes, but need not be limited to, determining party status and affording an opportunity to object to the motion for recorded hearings.
(d) After a final
determination of preliminary party status is made, in determining whether to
grant a motion for recorded hearings, the district commission shall consider
the public interest, including, but not limited to: the cost of recorded
hearings, the efficiency of the application process, the anticipated value of
the particular proceeding in evaluating the recorded hearing pilot project,
relative costs or cost savings to the parties, and whether recorded hearings
will likely result in providing more complete or less complete information for
the commission’s consideration. If it is clear that the public interest would
be served, the commission may shall grant
such motions for recorded hearings, with the consent of all parties. The commission’s
decision on this issue shall not be subject to appeal if made by the
applicant. The commission shall grant such motions by parties other than the
applicant only with the consent of the applicant.
(e) Motions under this section for recorded hearings before the district commission may be granted no more than 12 times throughout the state, without further legislative authority, and no more than three motions for recorded hearings may be granted by the same district commission.
(f) In situations in which recorded hearings are convened, the district commission shall extend the hearing schedule or take other appropriate action as necessary to provide a fair and reasonable opportunity for the parties to prepare, present, and respond to evidence presented, while preventing undue delay. Parties may prefile testimony and exhibits. If prefiled testimony is used, the applicant shall file its prefiled testimony, and then other parties shall be given the opportunity to file their prefiled testimony. Any rebuttal testimony shall be filed in similar sequence.
(g) Recorded hearings before the commission shall maintain the procedural and evidentiary flexibility and informality characteristic of administrative proceedings. Those standards shall be construed with particular flexibility in allowing the introduction of evidence.
(h) The commission hearing
shall be recorded on videotape, at the expense of the board district
commission, to preserve the words and identity of the speakers, and to
allow for the ready recovery of the testimony on the videotape by the parties
and the board environmental court, if necessary to clarify the
written record. In the event that an appeal is taken to the board environmental
court, the commission shall provide the board environmental court
with the original videotape of the hearing and the complete commission written
record. The commission shall make and preserve a copy of the original tape for
access and subsequent use by the parties and the board.
(i) The board shall adopt
emergency rules following one or more public hearings and a written comment
period to guide the implementation of this section throughout the state. In
this adoption process, the board need not believe that there exists an imminent
peril to public health, safety, and welfare. Review of these emergency rules
by the legislative committee on administrative rules shall not include the
issue of whether or not the rules are necessitated by an imminent peril to
public health, safety, or welfare. These emergency rules shall remain in
effect until the pilot project is terminated or the rules are amended
through the normal rulemaking process. Upon receipt of a request from a
commission for additional assistance in managing a recorded hearing, the board
shall provide temporary additional resources as necessary.
(j) In the case of appeals taken on the record under this section, notwithstanding provisions to the contrary in section 6089 of this title, the following shall apply:
(1) Parties to the appeal shall conform with the filing and procedural requirements in the board rules adopted in accordance with emergency rulemaking authority granted to the board under this section.
(2) The board environmental
court may require that additional evidence be presented, and may receive
and consider evidence offered beyond that which was presented before the
commission.
(3) The board environmental court
shall remand the case to the district commission if it is persuaded that the
district commission improperly excluded evidence, did not provide adequate
notice or opportunity to prepare or to be heard, or otherwise failed to comply
with the requirements of 3 V.S.A. chapter 25 pertaining to contested cases.
The board environmental court need not remand for harmless
error. Party status disputes shall be resolved through interlocutory appeal to
the board environmental court prior
to the district commission’s convening hearings on the merits.
(4) The board may, in its
discretion, substitute its judgment for the judgment of the commission without
finding that the commission erroneously applied the law.
(k) The board shall provide interim
reports on implementation of the recorded hearing pilot project this
section to the general assembly, by no later than March 15, 2002 2005
and January 15, 2003 2006. The executive director of the board
shall present to the legislative committees on natural resources and energy
those interim reports, which shall detail the range of projects for which there
were recorded hearings, the districts where the recorded hearings took place,
the time required and the outcome of completed commission hearings, whether
appeals were taken, and if so, by which party, and the time required for and
outcome of appellate proceedings before the board. The reports shall
indicate the number of instances in which requests for recorded hearings were
duly filed, but consent of all the parties was not obtained, and shall
describe the nature of the projects involved, what were the concerns of the parties
applicant that refused to consent, and other circumstances regarding
each case. In addition, the reports shall address the following, both from the
perspective of the board and from the perspective of the commissions: the
timeliness of the process, manageability of the process, any perceived effects
on public participation, and any additional resource demands or resource
efficiencies. The board shall provide the general assembly with a final
report on the implementation of this section following the date for sunset and
after all proceedings before the board are completed.
(l) This section shall be repealed on
September 1, 2004 2007, although proceedings pursuant to a motion
for recorded hearings that is filed prior to that date shall continue under
those sections until all of these proceedings before the board are completed.
Sec. 15. 10 V.S.A. § 6086 is amended to read:
§ 6086. ISSUANCE OF PERMIT; CONDITIONS AND CRITERIA
(a) Before
granting a permit, the board or district commission shall find that the
subdivision or development;
(1) Will not result in undue water or air pollution. In making this determination it shall at least consider: the elevation of land above sea level; and in relation to the flood plains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal; the slope of the land and its effect on effluents; the availability of streams for disposal of effluents; and the applicable health and environmental conservation department regulations.
(A) Headwaters. A permit will be granted whenever it is demonstrated by the applicant that, in addition to all other applicable criteria, the development or subdivision will meet any applicable health and environmental conservation department regulation regarding reduction of the quality of the ground or surface waters flowing through or upon lands which are not devoted to intensive development, and which lands are:
(i) headwaters of watersheds characterized by steep slopes and shallow soils; or
(ii) drainage areas of 20 square miles or less; or
(iii) above 1,500 feet elevation; or
(iv)
watersheds of public water supplies designated by the Vermont department of
health agency of natural resources; or
(v) areas supplying significant amounts of recharge waters to aquifers.
* * *
(G)
Wetlands. A permit will be granted whenever it is demonstrated by the
applicant, in addition to other criteria, that the development or subdivision
will not violate the rules of the water resources board, as adopted
under section 905(9) of this title, relating to significant wetlands.
* * *
(9) Is in
conformance with a duly adopted capability and development plan, and land use
plan when adopted. However, the legislative findings of sections subdivisions
7(a)(1) through 7(a)(19) of this act shall not be used as criteria in the
consideration of applications by a district commission or the environmental
board.
(A) Impact
of growth. In considering an application, the district commission or the
board shall take into consideration the growth in population experienced by
the town and region in question and whether or not the proposed development
would significantly affect their existing and potential financial capacity to
reasonably accommodate both the total growth and the rate of growth otherwise
expected for the town and region and the total growth and rate of growth which
would result from the development if approved. After considering anticipated
costs for education, highway access and maintenance, sewage disposal, water
supply, police and fire services and other factors relating to the public
health, safety and welfare, the district commission or the board shall
impose conditions which prevent undue burden upon the town and region in
accommodating growth caused by the proposed development or subdivision.
Notwithstanding section 6088 of this title the burden of proof that proposed
development will significantly affect existing or potential financial capacity
of the town and region to accommodate such growth is upon any party opposing an
application, excepting however, where the town has a duly adopted capital
improvement program the burden shall be on the applicant.
(B) Primary agricultural soils. A permit will be granted for the development or subdivision of primary agricultural soils only when it is demonstrated by the applicant that, in addition to all other applicable criteria, either, the subdivision or development will not significantly reduce the agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils; or,
(i) the
applicant can realize a reasonable return on the fair market value of his
the applicant’s land only by devoting the primary agricultural soils to
uses which will significantly reduce their agricultural potential; and
(ii) there are no nonagricultural or secondary agricultural soils owned or controlled by the applicant which are reasonably suited to the purpose; and
(iii) the subdivision or development has been planned to minimize the reduction of agricultural potential by providing for reasonable population densities, reasonable rates of growth, and the use of cluster planning, except that cluster planning shall not be required within an area exclusively designated by a municipality as an industrial park, and by providing for new community planning designed to economize on the cost of roads, utilities and land usage. For the purposes of this subdivision (a)(9)(B)(iii), “industrial park” means an area designated as such in the approved town plan of a town with a confirmed planning process, or in the case of an approved plan that has expired, the area shall be designated as such in duly adopted zoning bylaws; and
(iv) the development or subdivision will not significantly interfere with or jeopardize the continuation of agriculture or forestry on adjoining lands or reduce their agricultural or forestry potential.
(C) Forest and secondary agricultural soils. A permit will be granted for the development or subdivision of forest or secondary agricultural soils only when it is demonstrated by the applicant that, in addition to all other applicable criteria, either, the subdivision or development will not significantly reduce the potential of those soils for commercial forestry, including but not limited to specialized forest uses such as maple production or Christmas tree production, and will not significantly reduce the potential of those or adjacent primary agricultural soils for commercial agriculture; or
(i) the
applicant can realize a reasonable return on the fair market value of his
the applicant’s land only by devoting the forest or secondary
agricultural soils to uses which will significantly reduce their forestry or
agricultural potential; and
(ii) there are no nonforest or secondary agricultural soils owned or controlled by the applicant which are reasonably suited to the purpose; and
(iii) the subdivision or development has been planned to minimize the reduction of forestry and agricultural potential by providing for reasonable population densities, reasonable rates of growth, and the use of cluster planning, except that cluster planning shall not be required within an area exclusively designated by a municipality as an industrial park, and by providing for new community planning designed to economize on the cost of roads, utilities and land usage. For the purposes of this subdivision (a)(9)(C)(iii), “industrial park” means an area designated as such in the approved town plan of a town with a confirmed planning process, or in the case of an approved plan that has expired, the area shall be designated as such in duly adopted zoning bylaws
* * *
(E) Extraction of earth resources. A permit will be granted for the extraction or processing of mineral and earth resources, including fissionable source material:
(i) when it is demonstrated by the applicant that, in addition to all other applicable criteria, the extraction or processing operation and the disposal of waste will not have an unduly harmful impact upon the environment or surrounding land uses and development; and
(ii) upon
approval by the district commission or the board of a site
rehabilitation plan which insures that upon completion of the extracting or
processing operation the site will be left by the applicant in a condition
suited for an approved alternative use or development. A permit will not be
granted for the recovery or extraction of mineral or earth resources from
beneath natural water bodies or impoundments within the state, except that
gravel, silt and sediment may be removed pursuant to the regulations of the water
resources board agency of natural resources, and natural gas and oil
may be removed pursuant to the rules of the natural gas and oil resources
board.
* * *
(H) Costs
of scattered development. The district commission or board will grant a
permit for a development or subdivision which is not physically contiguous to
an existing settlement whenever it is demonstrated that, in addition to all
other applicable criteria, the additional costs of public services and
facilities caused directly or indirectly by the proposed development or subdivision
do not outweigh the tax revenue and other public benefits of the development or
subdivision such as increased employment opportunities or the provision of
needed and balanced housing accessible to existing or planned employment
centers.
* * *
(10) Is in
conformance with any duly adopted local or regional plan or capital program
under chapter 117 of Title 24. In making this finding, if the board
or district commission finds applicable provisions of the town plan to
be ambiguous, the board or district commission, for interpretive
purposes, shall consider bylaws, but only to the extent that they implement and
are consistent with those provisions, and need not consider any other evidence.
(b) At the
request of an applicant, or upon its own motion, the district commission or
the board shall consider whether to review any criterion or group of
criteria of subsection (a) of this section before proceeding to or continuing
to review other criteria. This request or motion may be made at any time prior
to or during the proceedings. The district commission or the board, in
its sole discretion, shall, within 20 days of the completion of deliberations
on the criteria that are the subject of the request or motion, either issue its
findings and decision thereon, or proceed to a consideration of the remaining
criteria. If the district commission or the board first issues a partial
decision under this subsection, the applicant or a party may appeal that
decision within 30 days under section 6089 of this title, or may appeal it
after the final decision on the complete application. If the applicant or
party has not taken a prior appeal of a partial decision under this subsection
with respect to particular criteria, then any findings on the complete
application, relating to those criteria, may be appealed under section 6089 of
this title.
(c) A
permit may contain such requirements and conditions as are allowable proper
exercise of the police power and which are appropriate within the respect to (1)
through (10) of subsection (a) subdivisions (a)(1) – (10) of this
section, including but not limited to those set forth in sections 4407(4),
(8) and (9), 4411(a)(2), 4415, 4416, and 4417 of Title 24, the
dedication of lands for public use, and the filing of bonds to insure compliance.
The requirements and conditions incorporated from Title 24 may be applied
whether or not a local plan has been adopted. General requirements and
conditions may be established by rule.
(d) The board may by rule allow the acceptance
of a permit or permits or approval of any state agency with respect to (1)
through (5) of subsection (a) subdivisions (a)(1) – (5) of this section
or a permit or permits of a specified municipal government with respect to (1)
through (7) and (9) and (10) of subsection (a) subdivisions (a)(1) – (7)
and (9) and (10) of this section, or a combination of such permits or
approvals, in lieu of evidence by the applicant. In the case of approvals
and permits issued by the agency of natural resources with respect to subdivisions
(a)(1) – (5) of this section, determinations of the agency shall be dispositive
for any issue addressed in the agency permits or approvals under the relevant
criteria of subsection (a) of this section in district commission proceedings.
The board district commission shall accept determinations issued
by a development review board under the provisions of 24 V.S.A. § 4449, with
respect to local Act 250 review of municipal impacts. The acceptance of such
approval, positive determinations, permit, or permits shall create a
presumption that the application is not detrimental to the public health and
welfare with respect to the specific requirement for which it is accepted. In
the case of approvals and permits issued by the agency of natural resources,
technical determinations of the agency shall be accorded substantial deference
by the commissions and the board. The acceptance of negative
determinations issued by a development review board under the provisions of 24
V.S.A. § 4449, with respect to local Act 250 review of municipal impacts shall
create a presumption that the application is detrimental to the public health
and welfare with respect to the specific requirement for which it is accepted.
Any determinations, positive or negative, under the provisions of
24 V.S.A. § 4449 shall create presumptions only to the extent that the
impacts under the criteria are limited to the municipality issuing the
decision. The district commission shall accept determinations issued, after
opportunity for comment by the parties, by the department of agriculture, food
and markets, with respect to whether or not particular soils are primary
agricultural soils, and those determinations shall be presumed to be accurate.
Such a rule may be revoked or amended pursuant to the procedures set forth in
3 V.S.A., chapter 25, the Vermont Administrative Procedure Act. The board
district commission shall not approve the acceptance of a permit or
approval of such an agency or a permit of a municipal government unless it
satisfies the appropriate requirements of subsection (a) of this section.
* * *
(f) Prior
to any appeal of a permit issued by a district commission, any aggrieved party
may file a request for a stay of construction with the district commission
together with a declaration of intent to appeal the permit. The stay request
shall be automatically granted for seven days upon receipt and notice to all
parties and pending a ruling on the merits of the stay request pursuant to
board rules. The automatic stay shall not extend beyond the 30-day appeal
period unless a valid appeal has been filed with the board environmental
court. The automatic stay may be granted only once under this subsection
during the 30-day appeal period. Following appeal of the district commission
decision, any stay request must be filed with the board pursuant to board
rules environmental court. A district commission shall not stay
construction authorized by a permit processed under the board’s minor
application procedures.
Sec. 16. 10 V.S.A. § 6087(a) is amended to read:
§ 6087. DENIAL OF APPLICATION
(a) No
application shall be denied by the board or district commission unless
it finds the proposed subdivision or development detrimental to the public
health, safety or general welfare.
Sec. 17. 10 V.S.A. § 6089 is amended to read:
§ 6089. APPEALS
(a)(1)
An appeal from the district commission shall be to the board and shall be
accompanied by a fee prescribed by section 6083a of this title.
(2) An
appellant to the board, under this section, shall file with the notice of
appeal a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of
the evidence that will be presented, and a preliminary list of witnesses who
will testify on behalf of the appellant.
(3) The
board shall hold a de novo hearing on all findings requested by any party that
files an appeal or cross appeal, according to the rules of the board.
(4)
Notice of appeal shall be filed with the board within 30 days. The board shall
notify the parties set forth in section 6085(c) of this title of the filing of
any appeal. The board shall proceed as in section 6085(b) and (c) of this
title and treat the applicant pursuant to section 814 of Title 3.
(b) An
appeal from a decision of the board under subsection (a) of this section shall be
to the supreme court by a party as set forth in section 6085(c) of this title.
(c) No
objection that has not been urged before the board may be considered by the
supreme court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be
excused because of extraordinary circumstances. The findings of the board with
respect to questions of fact, if supported by substantial evidence on the
record as a whole, shall be conclusive.
(d) An
appeal from the board will be allowed for all usual reasons, including the
unreasonableness or insufficiency of the conditions attached to a permit. An
appeal from the district commission will be allowed for any reason except no
appeal shall be allowed when an application has been granted and no preliminary
hearing requested.
Appeals of any act or decision of a district commission or the board under this chapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
Sec. 18. 10 V.S.A. § 6091 is amended to read:
§ 6091. RENEWALS AND NONUSE
(a) Renewal. At the expiration of each permit, it may be renewed under the same procedure herein specified for an original application.
(b) Nonuse
of permit. Nonuse of a permit for a period of three years following the date
of issuance shall constitute an abandonment of the development or subdivision
and the permit shall be considered expired. For purposes of this section, for
a permit to be considered “used,” construction must have commenced and
substantial progress toward completion must have occurred within the three-year
period, unless construction is delayed by litigation or proceedings to secure
other permits or to secure title through foreclosure, or unless, at the time
the permit is issued or in a subsequent proceeding, the district commission or board
environmental court provides that substantial construction may be
commenced more than three years from the date the permit is issued.
(c) Extensions. If the application is made for an extension prior to expiration the district commission may grant an extension and may waive the necessity of a hearing.
(d)
Completion dates for developments and subdivisions. Permits shall include
dates by which there shall be full or phased completion. The board, by rule,
shall establish requirements for review of those portions of developments and
subdivisions that fail to meet their completion dates, giving due consideration
to fairness to the parties involved, competing land use demands, and cumulative
impacts on the resources involved. If completion has been delayed by
litigation, proceedings to secure other permits, proceedings to secure title
through foreclosure, or because of market conditions, the district commission
or board environmental court shall provide that the completion
dates be extended for a reasonable period of time.
Sec. 19. 10 V.S.A. § 6093 is added to read:
§ 6093. AGRICULTURAL LANDS OFF-SITE MITIGATION
(a) An applicant for a permit under this chapter for a development or subdivision that is proposed to take place on primary agricultural soils may enter into an agricultural off-site mitigation agreement with the department of agriculture, food and markets, in which the applicant agrees to pay a calculated contribution into the Vermont housing and conservation trust fund established under section 312 of this title, from which it is used to protect other farmlands. An executed mitigation agreement shall be presented to the district commission with jurisdiction where the development or subdivision is proposed to occur; the commission then shall consider the mitigation agreement in evaluating whether a project satisfies subdivision 6086(a)(9)(B) of this title.
(b) The department will not enter a mitigation agreement unless the following all apply to an applicant’s project:
(1) the project complies with the requirements of subdivision 6086(a)(9)(B)(ii), (iii), and (iv);
(2) designs minimizing the reduction in soils agricultural potential have been considered and an on-site cluster development or subdivision would not result in the conservation of agricultural land with the ability to contribute to commercial agricultural enterprise; and
(3) the lands are in an area which is being or is likely to be converted to uses incompatible with farming or which will not support farming.
(c) The amount of money that must be contributed by a developer to a mitigation agreement shall be derived by:
(1) determining the number of acres of primary agricultural soils that would suffer potential reduction as a result of a particular development or subdivision;
(2) multiplying that number by a value determined by the commissioner of agriculture, food, and markets based on the quality of the agricultural soils lost through the proposed development. The quality of agricultural soils shall be determined by the commissioner in conformance with the United States department of agriculture value groups for Vermont soils. In no case shall this value be less than two in order to achieve a 2:1 (protected acres: acres of primary agricultural soils whose potential has been reduced) ratio, and then multiplying that result by a “price per acre” factor. The “price per acre” for primary agricultural soils shall be based on the amount that the department of agriculture, food and markets has determined to be the average, per-acre cost to acquire conservation easements on productive farmland in the county in which the development or subdivision is to occur.
* * * ANR revisions and conforming changes * * *
Sec. 20. 3 V.S.A. § 2802(b) is amended to read:
(b) The
environmental board and the water resources board are is attached
to the agency for the purpose of receiving administrative support.
Sec. 21. 3 V.S.A. § 2803(b) is amended to read:
(b)
Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section or any other provision of this
chapter the fish and wildlife board, and the environmental board and
the water resources board shall retain and exercise all powers and
functions given to them by law which are of regulatory or quasi-judicial
nature, including the power to adopt, amend and repeal rules and regulations,
to conduct hearings, to adjudicate controversies and to issue and enforce
orders, in the manner and to the extent to which those powers are given to
those respective boards by law.
Sec. 22. 3 V.S.A. § 2826 is amended to read:
§ 2826. ENVIRONMENTAL NOTICE BULLETIN; PERMIT HANDBOOK;
NOTICE BY SIGN
(a) The
secretary shall establish procedures for the publication of an
environmental notice bulletin, in order to provide for the timely public
notification of permit applications, notices, comment periods, hearings, and
permitting decisions. The secretary shall begin publication of the bulletin by
no later than July 1, 1995 on the agency’s website. At a minimum, the
bulletin shall contain the following information:
(1) notice of administratively complete permit applications submitted to the department of environmental conservation;
(2) notice of the comment period on the application and draft permit, if any, for those applications which were noticed;
(3) notice of the issuance of draft permit, if required by law, for those applications that were noticed;
(4) information on how to request a public hearing or meeting, if one is provided for by law, for those applications that were noticed;
(5) notice of all public hearings or meetings that are scheduled for those applications that were noticed; and
(6) notice of the issuance or denial of a permit for those applications that were noticed.
* * *
(c) In addition to any notice required for a permit issued by the department of environmental conservation, the secretary shall require each applicant to post a sign provided by the secretary, at cost, along the public road or highway, unless it is a limited access highway, that is the closest to the exact location of the project to be permitted. The applicant shall post the sign upon filing the application. This signage requirement shall not apply to applications for professional licenses or to potable water supply and wastewater permits for single‑family residences on their own individual lots.
Sec. 23. 4 V.S.A. § 2878 is amended to read:
§ 2878. INDEPENDENT BOARDS
BOARD
The environmental board and the water resources board are is
created and are is attached to the agency of natural resources
for the purpose of receiving administrative support. These boards
This board shall be constituted as provided by law and shall perform the
duties and functions specified by law.
Sec. 24. 10 V.S.A. § 552 is amended to read:
§ 552. DEFINITIONS
As used in this chapter:
* * *
(4) “Board”
means the solid waste and air quality variance board.
* * *
(7)
“Secretary” means the secretary of the agency of natural resources or such
person as the secretary may designate the secretary’s duly authorized
representative.
* * *
Sec. 25. 10 V.S.A. § 553 is amended to read:
§ 553. AGENCY AND
BOARD
(a) The
agency is designated as the air pollution control agency for the state. The
secretary or his or her
the secretary’s duly designated authorized
representative, within the agency, shall perform the functions vested in the
agency, as specified in the following sections of this chapter.
(b) A solid waste and air quality variance board shall be
appointed by the governor, with the advice and consent of the senate. The
board shall consist of five members, none of whom is otherwise employed by the
state. The board shall consist of a lawyer, a manufacturer, a professional
engineer, a businessman and a member representing the public at large. The
governor shall designate the chairman. The terms of office shall be five years
except that the initial members shall be appointed so that the term of one
member shall expire in each of the succeeding five years.
Sec. 26. 10 V.S.A. § 561 is amended to read:
§ 561. VARIANCES
(a) A
person who owns or is in control of any plant, building, structure, process or
equipment may apply to the board secretary for a variance from
the rules of the secretary adopted under this chapter. If a
request for a variance is related to an application for a permit under this
chapter, the applicant may file that request only after the secretary has
issued a declaratory ruling that makes it clear that the applicant would not be
eligible for the permit or after the secretary has granted or denied the
permit, according to the provisions of subsection 562(e) of this title. The board
secretary may grant a variance if it the secretary finds
that:
(1) The emissions occurring or proposed to occur do not endanger or tend to endanger human health or safety; and
(2) Compliance with the rules from which variance is sought would produce serious hardship without equal or greater benefits to the public.
(b) No
variance shall be granted pursuant to this section except after public hearing
on due notice notice and an opportunity for a public meeting and
until the board secretary has considered the relative interests
of the applicant, other owners of property likely to be affected by the
discharges, and the general public.
(c) Any variance or renewal thereof shall be granted within the requirements of subsection (a) of this section and for time periods and under conditions consistent with the reasons therefore, and within the following limitations:
(1) If the
variance is granted on the ground that there is no practicable means known or
available for the adequate prevention, abatement or control of the air
pollution involved, it shall be only until the necessary practicable means for
prevention, abatement or control become known and available, and subject to the
taking of any substitute or alternate measures that the board secretary
may prescribe.
(2) If the
variance is granted on the ground that compliance with the particular
requirement or requirements from which variance is sought will necessitate the
taking of measures which, because of their extent or cost, must be spread over
a considerable period of time, it shall be for a period not to exceed such
reasonable time as, in the view of the board secretary is
requisite for the taking of the necessary measures. A variance granted on the
ground specified herein shall contain a time schedule for the taking of action
in an expeditious manner and shall be conditioned on adherence to the time
schedule.
(3) If the variance is granted on the ground that it is justified to relieve or prevent hardship of a kind other than that provided for in subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection, it shall be for not more than one year.
(d) Any
variance granted pursuant to this section may be renewed on terms and
conditions and for periods, which would be appropriate on initial granting of a
variance. If complaint is made to the board secretary on account
of the variance, no renewal thereof shall be granted, unless following public hearing
on the complaint on due notice and an opportunity for a public meeting
on the complaint, the board secretary finds that renewal is
justified. No renewal shall be granted except on application therefore. The
application shall be made at least sixty 60 days prior to the
expiration of the variance. Immediately upon receipt of an application for
renewal, the board secretary shall give public notice of
the application in accordance with rules of the board.
(e) A
variance or renewal shall not be a right of the applicant or holder thereof but
shall be in the discretion of the board secretary. However,
any person adversely affected by a variance or renewal granted or denied by the
board may obtain judicial review thereof by appealing that decision within 30
days to the environmental court established under 4 V.S.A. chapter 27,
according to the provisions of section 562 of this title.
(f) Nothing
in this section and no variance or renewal granted pursuant hereto shall be
construed to prevent or limit the application of the emergency provisions and
procedures of section 560 of this chapter to any person or his the
person’s property.
(g) On application from a person who is subject to an increased air
emission fee caused by amendments to the provisions of 3 V.S.A. § 2822(j),
(k) and (l), the board secretary may grant an amendment in fee
amount. A fee amendment under this subsection may be granted only if the
applicant establishes that payment of fees would produce serious hardship. Fee
amendments granted under this subsection shall not be subject to the findings
required for the issuance of a variance under subsection (a) of this section,
but fee amendments shall otherwise be subject to the provisions of this chapter
regarding variances.
Sec. 27. 10 V.S.A. § 562 is amended to read:
§ 562. HEARINGS
AND JUDICIAL REVIEW APPEALS
(a) No
rule or regulation and no amendment or repeal thereof shall take effect except
after public hearing. The secretary shall appoint a time and place for the
hearing and shall order the publication of the substance thereof and of the
time and place of hearing two weeks successively in the daily newspapers of the
state, the last publication to be at least seven days before the day appointed
for the hearing Appeals of any act or decision of the secretary under
this chapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
(b) Nothing
in this section shall be construed to require a hearing before issuance of an
emergency order pursuant to section 560 of this chapter.
(c) [Repealed.]
(d) Any
person aggrieved by the issuance, denial, suspension, termination, revocation,
annulment, withdrawal or renewal of an individual or general permit pursuant to
this chapter may appeal that decision within 30 days to the environmental court
established under 4 V.S.A. chapter 27, except as otherwise provided in section
6104 of this title. The environmental court shall hold a de novo hearing and
shall issue an order affirming, revising or reversing the decision of the
secretary. An appeal filed pursuant to this section shall not stay the
decision of the secretary. For the purposes of an appeal pursuant to this
subsection, the environmental court shall have and may exercise all powers and
authorities of the superior court in a proceeding under Rule 75 of the Vermont
Rules of Civil Procedure. V.R.C.P. 76 shall not apply to appeals filed pursuant
to this section. A person appealing an issue under this subsection may not
request a variance on that same issue under subsection (e) of this section. A
person requesting a variance under subsection (e) of this section may not
appeal the same issue under this subsection.
(e) As a
mutually exclusive alternative to appealing an issue as provided in subsection
(d) of this section, a person aggrieved by the issuance, denial, suspension,
termination, revocation, annulment, withdrawal or renewal of an individual or
general permit may request a variance under section 561 of this title, if the
action in question involved a rule adopted under this chapter, and if the
person is entitled to request a variance under the terms of section 561. A
request for a variance shall be filed within 30 days. If an action on a permit
results in an appeal on one issue under subsection (d) and a request for a
variance under this subsection with respect to a different issue, the court
shall stay the appeal until the board has granted or denied the variance.
(f) With
respect to appeals from variance decisions under subsection (e) of this
section, the environmental court shall hold a hearing based on the record
developed before the variance board, and shall issue an order affirming,
revising or reversing the decision of the board. An appeal filed pursuant to
this subsection shall not stay the decision of the secretary. For the purposes
of an appeal pursuant to this subsection, the environmental court shall have
and may exercise all powers and authorities of the superior court in a
proceeding under V.R.C.P. 74.
(g) If a permit is denied under this section, and that denial is the subject of either an appeal or a request for a variance, the applicant need not commence application proceedings anew, once those issues are resolved.
Sec. 28. 10 V.S.A. § 752 is amended to read:
§ 752. DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this chapter:
* * *
(9) “Secretary” means the secretary of the agency of natural resources or the secretary’s duly authorized representative.
Sec. 29. 10 V.S.A. § 902 is amended to read:
§ 902. DEFINITIONS
Wherever used or referred to in this chapter, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(1) “Board” means the Vermont water
resources board;
* * *
Sec. 30. 10 V.S.A. § 905b is amended to read:
§ 905b. DUTIES; POWERS
The department shall protect and manage the water resources of the state in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter and shall:
* * *
(18) study and investigate the wetlands of the state and cooperate with other agencies and the board in collecting and compiling data relating to wetlands, propose to the board specific wetlands to be designated as significant wetlands, and implement through existing programs the rules adopted by the board governing significant wetlands, including the issuance or denial of conditional use determinations pursuant to section 1272 of this title;
(19) cooperate with the agencies of the federal government and of the province of Quebec, adjoining states and states through which water from Vermont streams flows in all matters relating to interstate streams;
(20) cooperate with the state board of health in matters of stream pollution where public health is involved;
(21) act as the Vermont water resources board mentioned in the act of Congress entitled, “An act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control and for other purposes,” approved December 22, 1944. In this connection, the department shall carry out the policy of the state as defined by section 1100 of this title.
Sec. 31. 10 V.S.A. § 1002 is amended to read:
§ 1002. DEFINITIONS
Wherever used or referred to in this chapter, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
* * *
(4) “Board”
means the Vermont water resources environmental board;
* * *
(9)
“Person” means applies to an individual, partnership, corporation,
municipality, state agency or other legal entity any individual,
partnership, company, corporation, association, unincorporated association,
joint venture, trust, municipality, the state of Vermont or any agency,
department or subdivision of the state, any federal agency, or any other legal
or commercial entity;
* * *
Sec. 32. 10 V.S.A. § 1004 is amended to read:
§ 1004. STATE’S AGENT
The secretary shall be the agent to coordinate the state interest before
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in all matters involving water quality
and regulation or control of natural stream flow through the use of dams
situated on streams within the boundaries of the state, and it shall advise the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of the amount of flow considered necessary
in each stream under consideration. The agency of natural resources shall be
the certifying agency of the state for purposes of section 401 of the federal
Clean Water Act and the secretary’s determinations on these certifications
shall be final action by the secretary appealable to the water resources
board environmental court. The secretary shall be the agent of the
state and shall represent the state’s interest under the provisions of the
Federal Power Act, including those that protect state-designated outstanding
resource waters. However, the secretary’s authority shall not infringe upon
the powers and duties of the public service board or the relations of that
board to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as set forth in the Federal
Power Act respecting water used for the development of hydro-electric power or
projects incident to the generation of electric energy for public use as part
of a public utility system.
Sec. 33. 10 V.S.A. § 1024 is amended to read:
§ 1024. Appeals
(a) Any
person aggrieved by the decision of the secretary under section 1023 or section
1004 of this title may file an appeal with the board within fifteen days of
issuance of notice of the secretary’s action. The filing of an appeal shall
stay the action of the secretary. Within five days of receipt of an appeal,
the board shall schedule a hearing giving notice to all persons required to
receive notice under section 1023. The hearing before the board shall be de
novo and shall be conducted as a contested case.
(b)
Any party aggrieved by a final order of the board, pursuant to subsection (a)
of this section, may appeal from a final order of the board to the Supreme
Court within 30 days of the date of the order. An appeal filed pursuant to
this section shall not stay the effectiveness of any order of the board pending
determination by the court, unless the court so orders.
Appeals of any act or decision of the secretary under this chapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
Sec. 34. 10 V.S.A. § 1032 is amended to read:
§ 1032. RULEMAKING ON SNOWMAKING WITHDRAWALS
The secretary shall adopt rules to determine conservation flow standards
for snowmaking, to be used in relevant agency of natural resources regulatory
processes governing water withdrawals, diversions, impoundments, and the
construction of appurtenant facilities, and to be used in developing positions
to be asserted by the agency in other state regulatory processes governing
conservation flows for snowmaking. These rules shall not supersede water
quality standards adopted by the water resources environmental
board pursuant to chapter 47 of this title. These rules shall achieve the
purposes of this subchapter, and shall provide for the periodic review of any
decision issued under the rules. All existing water withdrawals, diversions,
and impoundments for snowmaking which are permitted at instream flows below the
standards shall be reviewed by July 1, 2000.
Sec. 35. 10 V.S.A. § 1080(2) is amended to read:
(2)
“Person” means an individual, firm, partnership, cooperative electric
association, governmental body, state agency or domestic or foreign corporation
any individual, partnership, company, corporation, association,
unincorporated association, joint venture, trust, municipality, the state of
Vermont or any agency, department or subdivision of the state, any federal
agency, or any other legal or commercial entity;
Sec. 36. 10 V.S.A. § 1099 is amended to read:
§ 1099. APPEAL APPEALS
(a) A
person aggrieved by a decision of the department under this chapter may appeal
that decision to the water resources board within 30 days from its date. The
water resources board shall hold a de novo hearing at which all persons and
parties in interest may appear and be heard, and shall issue an order
affirming, reversing or modifying the act or decision of the department within
10 days following the conclusion of the hearing. The order shall be binding
upon the department. Filing an appeal shall not automatically stay the
effectiveness of any act or decision of the department pending determination by
the water resources board. Any party aggrieved by a final order of the water resources
board pursuant to this subsection may appeal to the supreme court within 30
days of the date of the order. An appeal filed pursuant to this subsection
shall not stay the effectiveness of any order of the board pending
determination by the court, unless the court so orders Appeals of any
act or decision of the department under this chapter shall be made in
accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
(b) Appeals from actions or orders of the public service board may be taken in the Supreme Court in accord with section 12 of Title 30.
Sec. 37. 10 V.S.A. § 1251 is amended to read:
§ 1251. DEFINITIONS
Whenever used or referred to in this chapter, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(1) “Board”
means the Vermont water resources environmental board;
* * *
(8)
“Person” means an individual, partnership, public or private corporation,
municipality, institution or agency of the state or federal government and
includes any officer or governing or managing body of a partnership, association,
firm or corporation any individual, partnership, company, corporation,
association, unincorporated association, joint venture, trust, municipality,
the state of Vermont or any agency, department, or subdivision of the state,
any federal agency, or any other legal or commercial entity;
* * *
Sec. 38. 10 V.S.A. § 1251a(b) is amended to read:
(b) The secretary shall establish by rule requirements for the
issuance of permits under subsection 1259(e) of this title, including in-stream
water quality parameters necessary to establish permit conditions and
performance monitoring; however these in-stream water quality parameters shall
not supersede water quality standards adopted by the water resources
board.
Sec. 39. 10 V.S.A. § 1263(b) is amended to read:
(b) Except
for applications for permission to discharge under the terms of a previously
issued general permit, the secretary shall provide for notice of each
application to the public and any appropriate officials of another state and
the federal government including the administrator of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, and shall provide an opportunity for written
comments or a public hearing or both on the application before making a final
ruling on the application. Prior to issuing a general permit, the secretary
shall give notice as provided in this subsection and provide for written
comments or a public hearing or both as provided in this subsection. For
applications for permission to discharge under the terms of a previously issued
general permit, the applicant shall provide notice, on a form provided by the
secretary, to the municipal clerk of the municipality in which the discharge is
located at the time the application is filed with the secretary, and the
secretary shall provide an opportunity for written comment, regarding whether
the application complies with the terms and conditions of the general permit,
for ten days following receipt of the application. The secretary may require
any applicant to submit any additional information, which the secretary
considers necessary and may refuse to grant a permit, or permission to
discharge under the terms of a general permit, until the information is
furnished and evaluated. Any person or party in interest aggrieved by a
final ruling of the secretary on an application for permission to discharge
under the terms of a previously issued general permit may appeal to the board
pursuant to section 1269 of this title, provided, however, that this appeal
shall be limited in scope to whether the discharge complies with the terms and
conditions of the general permit.
Sec. 40. 10 V.S.A. § 1264 is amended to read:
§ 1264. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
* * *
(b) The
secretary shall prepare a plan for the management of collected stormwater
runoff found by the department to be deleterious to receiving waters. The plan
shall recognize that the runoff of stormwater is different from the discharge
of sanitary and industrial wastes because of the influence of natural events of
stormwater runoff, the variations in characteristics of those runoffs, and the
increased stream flows and natural degradation of the receiving water quality
at the time of discharge. The plan shall be cost effective and designed to
minimize any adverse impact of stormwater runoff to waters of the state. By no
later than February 1, 2001, the secretary shall prepare an enhanced stormwater
management program and report on the content of that program to the house
committees on fish, wildlife and water resources and on natural resources and
energy and to the senate committee on natural resources and energy. In
developing the program, the secretary shall consult with the water resources
board, affected municipalities, regional entities, other state and federal
agencies, and members of the public. The secretary shall be responsible for
implementation of the program. The secretary’s stormwater management program
shall include, at a minimum, provisions that:
* * *
(g)(1) The secretary may issue a permit
consistent with the requirements of subsection (f) of this section, even where
a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) or wasteload allocation has not been prepared
for the receiving water. In any appeal to the board pursuant to section
1269 of this title: under this chapter,
(A) an individual permit meeting
the requirements of subsection (f) of this section shall have a rebuttable
presumption in favor of the permittee that the discharge does not cause or
contribute to a violation of the Vermont water quality standards for the
receiving waters with respect to the discharge of collected stormwater runoff.
This rebuttable presumption shall only apply to permitted discharges into
receiving waters on the Section 303(d) list that are principally impaired by
sources other than collected stormwater runoff; and
(B) the review of an individual
discharge seeking coverage under a general permit issued pursuant to the
requirements of subsection (f) of this section shall be limited in scope as
specified in subsection 1263(b) of this chapter.
(2) This subsection shall apply to stormwater permits issued under the federally delegated NPDES program only to the extent allowed under federal law.
* * *
Sec. 41. 10 V.S.A. § 1269 is amended to read:
§ 1269. APPEALS TO
BOARD
Any person or party in interest aggrieved
by an act or decision of the secretary pursuant to this subchapter may appeal
to the board within thirty days. The board shall hold a de novo hearing at
which all persons and parties in interest as determined by board rule may
appear and be heard and shall issue an order affirming, reversing or modifying
the act or decision of the secretary within 10 days following the conclusion of
the hearing. The order shall be binding upon the department. An appeal filed
pursuant to this section shall not stay the effectiveness of any act or
decision of the department pending determination by the board Appeals of
any act or decision of the secretary under this chapter shall be made in
accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
Sec. 42. 10 V.S.A. § 1272 is amended to read:
§ 1272. REGULATION OF ACTIVITIES CAUSING DISCHARGE OR
AFFECTING SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS
If the secretary finds that any person’s
action, or an activity, results in the construction, installation, operation or
maintenance of any facility or condition which reasonably can be expected to
create or cause a discharge to waters in violation of this subchapter, or to
violate the board’s rules under section 905(9) 6025 of this title
relating to significant wetlands, the secretary may issue an order establishing
reasonable and proper methods and procedures for the control of that activity
and the management of substances used therein which cause discharges or
violations of board rules with respect to significant wetlands in order to
reduce or eliminate those discharges and rule violations with respect to
significant wetlands. Any person who receives an order pursuant to this
section may appeal to the board as provided in section 1269 of this title.
Sec. 43. 10 V.S.A. § 1381 is amended to read:
§ 1381. DEFINITIONS AS USED IN THIS SUBCHAPTER
* * *
(5)
“Secretary” means the secretary of the agency of natural resources or his or
her the secretary’s
duly authorized representative;
(6)
“Person” means any proprietor of a commercial establishment, corporation,
municipality, the state of Vermont or any department, agency or subdivision of
the state, and any partnership, unincorporated association or other legal
entity any individual, partnership, company, corporation, association,
unincorporated association, joint venture, trust, municipality, the state of
Vermont or any agency, department or subdivision of the state, any federal
agency, or any other legal or commercial entity.
Sec. 44. 10 V.S.A. § 1392(d) is amended to read:
(d) The
groundwater management strategy, including groundwater classification and
associated technical criteria and standards, shall be adopted as a rule in
accordance with the provisions of 3 V.S.A., chapter 25. The secretary shall
file any final proposed rules regarding the groundwater management strategy,
with the water resources environmental board not less than 30
days prior to filing with the legislative committee on administrative rules.
The board shall review the final proposed rules and comment regarding their
compatibility with the Vermont water quality standards and the objectives of
the Vermont Water Pollution Control Act. The secretary shall include the water
resources environmental board’s comments in filing the final
proposed rules with the legislative committee on administrative rules.
Sec. 45. 10 V.S.A. § 1400 is amended to read:
§ 1400. APPEALS
(a) A
person aggrieved by a decision of the commissioner under section 1402 of this
title may appeal the decision to the water resources board and from there to
Washington superior court or the superior court of the county in which the
person’s principal place of business is located.
(b) A person aggrieved by a decision
or order of the commissioner under section 1403 of this title may appeal the
decision or order to the water resources board and from there to the superior
court for the county in which he or she resides or the well is located.
Appeals of any act or decision of the commissioner or secretary under this chapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
Sec. 46. 10 V.S.A. § 1422 is amended to read:
§ 1422. DEFINITIONS
In this chapter, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
* * *
(2) “Board”
means water resources environmental board;
* * *
(7) “Secretary” means the secretary of natural resources or the secretary’s duly authorized representative;
* * *
Sec. 47. 10 V.S.A. § 1571 is amended to read:
§ 1571. DEFINITIONS
As used in this chapter:
* * *
(2) “Board”
means the water resources board.
* * *
(8) “Secretary” means the secretary of the agency of natural resources or the secretary’s duly authorized representatives.
* * *
Sec. 48. 10 V.S.A. § 1629 is amended to read:
§ 1629. APPEAL
APPEALS
Any municipality aggrieved by an act or
decision of the department in establishing the priority system and the priority
of awards to projects under this chapter may appeal to the board within 30
days. The board shall hold a hearing at which all persons and parties in
interest may appear and be heard to determine whether the decision of the department
complies with the priority system adopted pursuant to section 1628 of this
title. The board shall issue an order affirming, reversing or modifying the
decision of the department. The order shall be binding upon the department.
An appeal filed pursuant to this section shall not stay the effectiveness of
any decision of the department pending determination by the board. Appeals
from the decisions of the board shall be taken de novo to the superior court
Appeals of any act or decision of the department under this subchapter shall
be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
Sec. 49. 10 V.S.A. § 1680 is amended to read:
§ 1680. APPEALS
Any person or party in interest who is
aggrieved by the secretary’s decision to issue, renew, deny, suspend or revoke
a permit or certification pursuant to this chapter may appeal such decision,
pursuant to Rule 74 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, within 30 days of
the date thereof to the superior court of the county in which the public water
supply is located or the county where the certificate holder’s principal place
of business is located. An appeal shall not stay the effectiveness of the
secretary’s decision unless the court so orders Appeals of any act or
decision of the department under this subchapter shall be made in accordance
with chapter 220 of this title.
Sec. 50. 10 V.S.A § 1683 is amended to read:
§ 1683. FILTRATION REQUIREMENTS
* * *
(b) The department of environmental
conservation shall grant waivers to requirements for water filtration and
exemptions to public and private water systems as provided under the federal
Safe Drinking Water Act, surface water rule, when a water system owner
demonstrates that the water system has a proven record of delivering adequate
quantities of clean and safe drinking water and that adequate protection of the
surface water source is or may be assured. In the event that the department
denies an application for a waiver, the water system owner may appeal the
decision to the water resources board within 30 days of such decision. The
water system owner may appeal a decision of the water resources board to the
superior court within 30 days of the board’s decision, following the same
procedure provided by section 1680 of this title for an appeal from a decision
by the secretary.
Sec. 51. 10 V.S.A. § 1933 is amended to read:
§ 1933. APPEALS
Any person or party in interest
aggrieved by an act or decision of the secretary pursuant to this chapter may
appeal within 30 days to the superior court of the county where the tanks are
located. The court shall hold a de novo hearing at which all persons and
parties in interest as determined by court rule may appear and be heard and
shall issue an order affirming, reversing or modifying the act or decision of
the secretary. The order shall be binding on the secretary. An appeal filed
pursuant to this section shall not stay the effectiveness of any act or
decision of the department, unless the court specifically grants that stay upon
petition or its own motion Appeals of any act or decision of the
department under this subchapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220
of this title.
Sec. 52. 10 V.S.A. § 1977 is amended to read:
§ 1977. APPEALS; STAYS
(a) A person aggrieved by an act or decision, other than an enforcement
decision, of the secretary under this chapter, may appeal to the water
resources board within 30 days of the date of the act or decision. The filing
of an appeal shall not stay the effectiveness of an act or decision of the
secretary, unless the board so orders in accordance with board rule. The board
shall hold a de novo hearing at which all parties, as determined by board rule,
may appear and be heard, and shall issue an order that shall be binding on the
secretary and all parties.
(b) Any party aggrieved by a final order of the water resources board
pursuant to this section may appeal to the Supreme Court within 30 days of the
date of the order. An appeal filed pursuant to this section shall not stay the
effectiveness of any order of the board pending determination by the court,
unless the court so orders.
Appeals of any act or decision of the department under this subchapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title
Sec. 53. 10 V.S.A. § 2625 is amended to read:
§ 2625. REGULATION OF HEAVY CUTTING
* * *
(f) Appeals. If the exemption is denied or if authorization to proceed is denied, the landowner shall have 30 days in which to file an appeal with the commissioner.
(1) Upon the filing of an appeal, the commissioner may appoint a review team of natural resources professionals to visit the site, gather information about the proposed heavy cut, and make recommendations to the commissioner. The commissioner may also appoint a hearing officer to take sworn statements of the landowner, the review team, and other witnesses called by the landowner or the hearing officer, and make recommendations to the commissioner.
(2) The commissioner shall issue a decision in writing within 30 days of the receipt of an appeal.
(3) The
landowner may appeal the commissioner’s decision within 30 days to the
environmental court. The court shall review the case on the record, and affirm
the decision, unless it finds that the commissioner did not have reasonable
grounds on which to base the decision Appeals of the commissioner’s
decision shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
* * *
Sec. 54. 10 V.S.A. § 6602 is amended to read:
§ 6602. DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this chapter:
* * *
(15) “Board”
means the solid waste and air quality variance board established by section 553
of this title.
* * *
(22) “Panel”
means the waste facility panel established by section 6101 of this title.
* * *
Sec. 55. 10 V.S.A. § 6606a(f) is amended to read:
(f) Appeals
from a determination of the secretary regarding a certificate of need shall be
to the waste facility panel under 10 V.S.A. chapter 151, subchapter 5.
Sec. 56. 10 V.S.A. § 6606b(b) is amended to read:
(b) Review of a permit, certification,
classification action, or endangered species variance issued by the secretary
for the construction, operation, maintenance, closure and post-closure of a
hazardous waste management facility shall be governed by subchapter 5 of
chapter 151 of this title. A request for review shall be filed with the waste
facility panel within 30 days of the secretary’s determination.
Sec. 57. 10 V.S.A. § 6613 is amended to read:
§ 6613. VARIANCES
(a) A
person who owns or is in control of any plant, building, structure, process or
equipment may apply to the board secretary for a variance from
the rules of the secretary adopted under this chapter. The board
secretary may grant a variance if it he or she finds that:
(1) The variance proposed does not endanger or tend to endanger human health or safety; and
(2) Compliance with the rules from which variance is sought would produce serious hardship without equal or greater benefits to the public.
(3) The variance granted does not enable the applicant to generate, transport, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste in a manner which is less stringent than that required by the provisions of Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, and amendments thereto, codified in 42 U.S.C. Chapter 82, subchapter 3, and regulations promulgated under such subtitle.
(b) No
variance shall be granted pursuant to this section except after public hearing
on due notice notice and an opportunity for a public meeting and
until the board secretary has considered the relative interests
of the applicant, other owners of property likely to be affected, and the
general public.
(c) Any variance or renewal thereof shall be granted within the requirements of subsection (a) of this section and for time periods and under conditions consistent with the reasons therefore, and within the following limitations:
(1) If the
variance is granted on the ground that there is no practicable means known or
available for the adequate prevention, abatement or control of the air and
water pollution involved, it shall be only until the necessary practicable
means for prevention, abatement or control become known and available, and
subject to the taking of any substitute or alternate measures that the board
secretary may prescribe.
(2) If the
variance is granted on the ground that compliance with the particular
requirement or requirements from which variance is sought will necessitate the
taking of measures which, because of their extent or cost, must be spread over
a considerable period of time, it shall be for a period not to exceed such
reasonable time as, in the view of the board secretary, is
requisite for the taking of the necessary measures. A variance granted on the
ground specified herein shall contain a time schedule for the taking of action
in an expeditious manner and shall be conditioned on adherence to the time
schedule.
(3) If the
variance is granted on the ground that it is justified to relieve or prevent
hardship of a kind other than that provided for in subdivisions (1) and (2) of
this subsection, it shall be for not more than one year, except that in the
case of a variance from the siting requirements for a sanitary landfill solid
waste management facility, the variance may be for as long as the board
secretary determines necessary, including a permanent variance.
(d) Any
variance granted pursuant to this section may be renewed on terms and
conditions and for periods, which would be appropriate on initial granting of a
variance. If complaint is made to the board secretary on account
of the variance, no renewal thereof shall be granted, unless following public hearing
on the complaint on due notice notice and an opportunity for a public
meeting on the complaint, the board secretary finds that
renewal is justified. No renewal shall be granted except on application therefore.
The application shall be made at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the
variance. Immediately upon receipt of an application for renewal, the board
secretary shall give public notice of the application in accordance
with rules of the board.
(e) A
variance or renewal shall not be a right of the applicant or holder thereof but
shall be in the discretion of the board. However, any person adversely
affected by a variance or renewal granted or denied by the board may obtain
judicial review thereof in the Supreme Court secretary.
(f) This section does not limit the authority of the secretary under section 6610 of this title concerning imminent hazards from solid waste, nor under section 6610a of this title concerning hazards from hazardous waste and violations of statutes, rules or orders relating to hazardous waste.
Sec. 58. 10 V.S.A. § 6620(b) is amended to read:
(b) Review of a permit, certification,
provisional certification, classification action, or endangered species
variance issued by the secretary for the construction, operation, maintenance,
closure and post-closure of a waste management facility shall be governed by
subchapter 5 of chapter 151 of this title. A request for review shall be filed
with the waste facility panel within 30 days of the secretary’s determination.
Sec. 59. 10 V.S.A. § 6622b is added to read:
§ 6622b. APPEALS
Appeals of any act or decision of the secretary under this chapter shall be made in accordance with chapter 220 of this title.
Sec. 60. 29 V.S.A. § 401 is amended to read:
§ 401. POLICY
Lakes and ponds which are public waters of
Vermont and the lands lying thereunder are a public trust, and it is the policy
of the state that these waters and lands shall be managed to serve the public
good, as defined by section 405 of this title, to the extent authorized by
statute. For the purposes of this chapter, the exercise of this management
shall be limited to encroachments subject to section 403 of this title. The
management of these waters and lands shall be exercised by the department of
environmental conservation in accordance with this chapter and the rules of the
water resources environmental board. For the purposes of this chapter,
jurisdiction of the department shall be construed as extending to all lakes and
ponds which are public waters and the lands lying thereunder, which lie beyond
the shoreline or shorelines delineated by the mean water level of any lake or
pond which is a public water of the state, as such mean water level is
determined by the board. No provision of this chapter shall be construed to
permit trespass on private lands without the permission of the owner.
Sec. 61. 29 V.S.A. § 402 is amended to read:
§ 402. DEFINITIONS
Whenever used in this chapter, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(1) “Board” means the Vermont water
resources board;
* * *
(5)
“Person” means an individual, partnership, public or private corporation,
municipality, institution or agency of the state, and any other legal or
commercial entity any individual, partnership, company, corporation,
association, unincorporated association, joint venture, trust, municipality,
the state of Vermont or any agency, department, or subdivision of the state,
any federal agency, or any other legal or commercial entity;
* * *
Sec. 62. 29 V.S.A. § 406 is amended to read:
§ 406. APPEALS
(a) Any
person aggrieved by the decision of the department under section 405(c) of this
title may appeal to the board within 10 days from the date of notice of
action. The filing of an appeal shall stay the action of the department Appeals
of any act or decision of the department under this chapter shall be made in
accordance with chapter 220 of Title 10.
(b) Within
five days of receipt of an appeal, the board shall give notice to all persons
required to receive notice under section 405(a) of this title and to other
persons as it considers appropriate. Within 20 days of the receipt of an
appeal, the board shall schedule a hearing and give notice to all persons
required to receive notice. The hearing by the board shall be de novo and
shall be conducted as a contested case.
(c) Parties shall be the applicant,
the municipality in which the project is located, the department and other
persons whom the board allows by rule. Within a reasonable period of time
after the conclusion of the hearing, the board shall issue an order affirming,
modifying or reversing the action of the department. The board shall send
copies of its order to all parties and the appropriate city or town clerk.
Sec. 63. 29 V.S.A. § 408 is amended to read:
§ 408. PERMIT
(a) A
permit may contain any conditions that the department or board considers
necessary to protect the public good.
(b) No
person granted a permit under this chapter is relieved of his responsibility
to comply with any other applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations
and permits.
(c) A permit may be revoked by the board
or the department in the event of violation of any condition attached to
the permit.
Sec. 64. 29 V.S.A. § 409 is amended to read:
§ 409. INJUNCTION
Any person aggrieved by any violation of
this chapter, or the attorney general at the request of the department or
board, may institute any appropriate action in the superior court of the
county in which a proposed or existing encroachment is located, to prevent,
restrain, correct or abate any violation of this chapter or of the conditions
of any permit issued under this chapter.
Sec. 65. REPEAL
10 V.S.A. §§ 903 (creation of water resources board), 904 (records, assistants), 905 (duties; powers), 1270 (appeals from water resources board), 6104 (waste facility panel), 6102 (parties), 6103 (review of provisional certifications), 6103a (review of certifications of need), 6104 (review of agency determinations), 6105 (appeal of district commission decisions), 6106 (consolidation of Act 250 and agency permits), and 6107 (appeals to the supreme court), 6108 (transition), and 29 V.S.A. § 407 (appeals to supreme court) are repealed.
Sec. 66. TRANSITION AND IMPLEMENTATION
(a)(1) Continued jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the repeal of their respective enabling authorities, the environmental board, water resources board, waste facility panel, and the air and solid waste variance board shall continue to exist and have jurisdiction with their preexisting membership to complete their consideration of any action pending before them as of July 1, 2003, except that appeals, petitions, and requests for variances received before July 1, 2003 where the respective boards and panel have not yet initiated proceedings shall be transferred to the environmental court.
(2) Notwithstanding the repeal of its jurisdictional authority under this act, the applicable superior court shall continue to have jurisdiction to complete its consideration of any action pending before it as of July 1, 2003, except that any filing received before July 1, 2003 where the court has not initiated proceedings shall be transferred to the environmental court.
(b) Existing rules. All rules adopted by the water resources board prior to July 1, 2003 shall be deemed to be rules adopted by the environmental board and shall remain in effect until amended or repealed by the environmental board.
(c) Upon enactment of this act, the environmental board shall consist of 14 members, comprised of the combined membership of the current environmental board and the water resources board. As the terms of water resources board members and preexisting environmental board members end, alternating between the members of the two boards, the newly constituted environmental board shall decrease in number until it again consists of nine members.
(a) The establishment of eight new full-time positions – one case manager, one docket clerk, two docket clerk/stenographer, two staff attorney, one law clerk, and one superior court judge – is authorized exclusively for the environmental court in the judicial branch.
(b) For fiscal year 2004, two positions which supported the waste facility panel are eliminated. For fiscal year 2005, three positions which supported the water resources board are eliminated.
(c) For fiscal year 2004, there is appropriated to the judicial branch the amount of $290,026.00 from the general fund and $120,000.00 from the solid waste management assistance account of the waste management assistance fund to fill the positions described above and provide for other personal service expenses and operating expenses necessary for the operation of the enhanced environmental court described in this act. This appropriation is two‑thirds of the base budget necessary for the enhanced environmental court and is made in anticipation that not all positions need to be fully funded as of July 1, 2003 and that full funding of the court will be provided in fiscal year 2005.
Rep. Helm of Castleton, for the committee on Appropriations, recommended that the bill ought to pass when amended as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy and when further amended as follows:
By striking Sec. 67, and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
SEC. 67 POSITIONS AND APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) The establishment of six new full-time positions – two case managers, two courtroom operators, one law clerk, and one environmental court judge – is authorized exclusively for the environmental court in the judicial branch.
(b) For fiscal year 2004, as of January 1, 2004, two positions, which supported the waste facility panel, are eliminated. For fiscal year 2005, as of January 1, 2005, four positions, which supported the combined environmental board, are eliminated.
(c) For fiscal year 2004, there is appropriated to the judicial branch the amount of $261,011.37 from the general fund and $65,320.73 from the solid waste management assistance account of the waste management assistance fund to fill the positions described above and provide for other personal service expenses and operating expenses necessary for the operation of the enhanced environmental court described in this act. $45,843 of the funds appropriated in this section shall be available to be used for contractual personal service expenses regarding the use of special masters and the hiring of independent expert witnesses. This appropriation funds the six positions described in subsection (a) of this section for only one-half of fiscal year 2004.
Rep. Sheltra of Derby in the Chair.
The bill, having appeared on the Calendar one day for notice, was taken up and read the second time,
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as recommended by the committee on Appropriations?
Recess
At eleven o’clock and twenty minutes in the forenoon, the Speaker declared a recess until one o’clock and thirty minutes in the afternoon.
Afternoon
At one o’clock and thirty minutes in the afternoon, the Speaker called the House to order.
Consideration Resumed;
Bill Amended and Third Reading Ordered
H. 175
Consideration resumed on House bill, entitled
An act relating to consolidated environmental appeals and revisions of land use development law;
The recurring question, Shall the House amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy as recommended by the committee on Appropriations? was agreed to.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? Rep. Helm of Castleton moved to amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as follows:
In Sec. 67(c) by striking the first sentence and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
For fiscal year 2004, there is appropriated to the judicial branch the amount of $261,011.37 from the general fund. Furthermore, $65,320.73 of the funds appropriated by Sec. 233 of H.464 of 2003 shall be transferred to the judicial branch,. Both of these appropriations shall be used to fill the positions described above and provide for other personal service expenses and operating expenses necessary for the operation of the enhanced environmental court described in this act.
Which was agreed to.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? Rep. Nitka of Ludlow moved to amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as follows:
First: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a), after the word “secretary” by striking the comma and inserting the word “or” and by striking the following: “, or environmental board”
Second: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. §8504(b)(2), by inserting a new subdivision (B) to read as follows: (B) the decision being appealed is the granting or denial of party status; or And by relettering the former (B) as (C).
Third: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. §8504(c), by striking all after the words “except for” and by inserting the following “:
(1) acts or decisions involving stream alteration permits or shoreline encroachment permits issued by the secretary; and
(2) the denial of party status by a district commission.
Fourth: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. §8504(d), in the first sentence, by striking the words “shall have the authority to” and inserting the word “may”. Also in §8504(d), by striking the second sentence in its entirety and creating a new subsection (e) to read as follows:
(e) The environmental court may consolidate or coordinate different appeals where those appeals all relate to the same project.
And by relettering the remaining subsections to be alphabetically correct.
Fifth: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. § 8504, by striking the newly relettered subsection (f) and inserting the following:
(f) The environmental court shall hold a de novo hearing on those issues which have been appealed, unless the decision of the district commission has been conducted as a recorded hearing pursuant to section 6085a of this title, in which case the review shall be on the record developed in the recorded hearing.
Sixth: In Sec. 1, by striking newly renumbered 10 V.S.A. §8504(i) and inserting the following:
(i) The secretary may represent the agency in all appeals under this section. If more than one state agency either appeals or seeks to intervene in an appeal under this section, only the attorney general may represent the interests of the state in the appeal.
Seventh: In Sec. 1, after 10 V.S.A. § 8504(i), by inserting the following:
(j) Prior decisions of the environmental board, water resources board, and waste facilities panel shall be given the same weight and consideration as prior decisions of the environmental court.
Eighth: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. § 8505(a) after the word “decision” by inserting the words “of the environmental board or” and by striking the words “judgment or order” and inserting the words “order or judgment” and after the words “was a party to the” by inserting the words “proceeding before the environmental board or the”
Ninth: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. § 8505(b), after the words “appeal a decision of” insert the words “the environmental board or”
Tenth: In Sec. 1, 10 V.S.A. §8505, by deleting subsection (c) in its entirety, relettering the subsequent subsections, and in the newly relettered subsection (c), in the first sentence, after the words “raised before” by inserting the words “the environmental board or” and in the second sentence, after the words “findings of” by inserting the words “the environmental board or” and by striking the newly relettered subsection (d) and inserting the following:
(d) The attorney general may represent the state in all appeals under this section.
Eleventh: In Sec. 2, 3 V.S.A. §2828(e) by striking the following: “the municipal and regional planning commissions in any adjacent Vermont municipality, if the project is located on a boundary”, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “any adjacent Vermont municipality and its municipal and regional planning commissions”
Twelfth: In Sec. 5, 4 V.S.A. §1001(g) by striking “may enact rules” and inserting “shall adopt rules pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 1” and in subdivision 4 V.S.A. §1001(g)(3), after the words “use of” by inserting the words “discovery and”
Thirteenth: In Sec. 8, 10 V.S.A. §6027(h), in the first sentence, by striking “may” and inserting “shall”
Fourteenth: by striking Sec. 12 and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Sec. 12. 10 V.S.A. § 6084 is amended to read:
§ 6084. NOTICE
(a) On or before the date of filing of application the applicant shall send notice and a copy of the application to the owner of the land if the applicant is not the owner; any adjoining property owner; the municipality in which the land is located; the municipal and regional planning commissions for the municipality in which the land is located; any adjacent Vermont municipality and municipal and regional planning commission if the land is located on a boundary. The applicant shall furnish to the district commission the names of those furnished notice by affidavit, and shall post a copy of the notice in the town clerk's office of the town or towns wherein the land lies.
(b) The district commission shall
forward notice and a copy of the application to the board and any state
agency directly affected, the solid waste management district in which the land
is located, if the development or subdivision constitutes a facility pursuant
to subdivision 6602(10) of this title, and any other municipality, state
agency, or person the district commission or board deems appropriate.
In addition, the district commission shall forward notice to any adjacent
Vermont municipality and its municipal and regional planning commissions.
Notice shall also be published in a local newspaper generally circulating in
the area where the land is located not more than 7 seven days after
receipt of the application.
Fifteenth: In Sec. 13, 10 V.S.A. §6085(c)(1), before the words “In proceedings” by inserting the following: “Party status.”
Sixteenth: In Sec. 13, 10 V.S.A. §6085, by striking subdivision (c)(1)(E) and inserting in lieu thereof the following: “(E) Any adjoining property owner who demonstrates an interest which may be affected by the outcome of the proceeding and who is so situated that the disposition of the proceeding may as a practical matter impair or impede the person’s ability to protect that interest; and”
Seventeenth: In Sec. 13, 10 V.S.A. §6085(c)(2)(D)(ii) by striking the word “property” and inserting “interest”
Eighteenth: In Sec. 13, 10 V.S.A. §6085(c)(5)in the first sentence by striking the word “appoint” and inserting “allow” and after the first sentence, by inserting the following: “Amicus curiae shall not be accorded party status.” And in the last sentence, after the word “allowed” by striking the word “other” and inserting the word “the”
Nineteenth: In Sec. 13, 10 V.S.A. §6085(c), after the following “(6)” by inserting the following: “Re-examination of party status.”
Twentieth: In Sec. 22, 3 V.S.A. §2826 (c), in the first sentence, after the following: “at cost,” by inserting the words “where it is prominently displayed” and at the end of the subsection, by inserting the following: “Signs provided by the secretary shall be at least 11 inches by 17 inches and shall not exceed three feet per side, shall be exempt from any permit from the municipality within which the proposed project is located, and shall be removed immediately upon expiration of any appeal period for permits issued by the secretary for the project. If the project is located in more than one municipality, a sign shall be posted in each municipality.
Twenty-first: In Sec. 66(a), by striking the following: “July 1, 2003” in each of the four places it appears, and by inserting in each of those four places the following: “January 1, 2004”
Which was agreed to.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? Rep. Flory of Pittsford moved to amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as follows:
First: In Sec. 3, 4 V.S.A. § 21a(a), by striking the words “one of”
Second: By striking Sec. 5 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Sec. 5. 4 V.S.A. § 1001 is amended to read:
§ 1001. ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
(a) An environmental court having statewide jurisdiction is created as a
court of record subject to the authority granted to the supreme court. The
environmental court shall consist of the presiding judge sitting alone two
judges.
(b) One Two environmental judge judges shall
be appointed within the judicial branch who shall hear matters arising under
chapters 23 and 201 and 220 of Title 10 and matters
arising under 24 V.S.A. chapter 117 and chapter 61, subchapter 12 in
environmental court. The environmental judge shall sit in environmental court
at least two‑thirds of his or her time.
(c) An environmental judge shall be an attorney admitted to practice
before the Vermont supreme court. An environmental judge shall be nominated,
appointed, confirmed, paid, and retained, and shall receive all benefits in the
manner of a superior court judge.
(d) An environmental judge shall be appointed on April 1, for a term of six years or the unexpired portion thereof.
(e) Evidentiary proceedings in the environmental court shall be held in the county in which all or a portion of the land which is the subject of the appeal is located or where the violation is alleged to have occurred, unless the parties agree to another location; provided however, that the environmental judge shall offer expeditious evidentiary hearings so that no such proceedings are moved to another county to obtain an earlier hearing. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, all nonevidentiary hearings may be conducted by telephone using an audio or video tape record. If a party objects to a telephone hearing, the court may require a personal appearance for good cause.
(f)
The environmental
court shall be provided with a dedicated
minimum
of one court manager, two law clerks, two case managers, one
docket clerk, and two courtroom operators. These positions shall not be
subject to any rotation or sharing with other courts. The environmental
court shall receive the same funding and provisions for security as provided to
county courthouses.
Which was agreed to.
Rep. Houston of Ferrisburgh in Chair.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? Reps. Lippert of Hinesburg, Atkins of Winooski, Audette of South Burlington, Deen of Westminster, Hummel of Underhill, Jewett of Ripton, Kiss of Burlington, Marek of Newfane, Martin of Springfield, Nuovo of Middlebury and Smith of Morristown moved to amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as follows:
First: By striking Sec. 1 in its entirety and inserting a new Sec. 1 to read:
Sec. 1. 10 V.S.A. chapter 220 is added to read:
* * * The Consolidated Enhanced Environmental Board * * *
Chapter 220. Consolidated Environmental Appeals ANd RULEMAKING
§ 8501. PURPOSE
It is the purpose of this chapter to:
(1) consolidate existing appeal routes for acts or decisions of the secretary and the district commission excluding enforcement actions brought pursuant to chapters 201 and 211 of this title and the adoption of rules under chapter 25 of Title 3;
(2) standardize the appeal periods, the parties who may appeal these acts or decisions, and the ability to stay any act or decision upon appeal, taking into account the nature of the different programs affected;
(3) encourage people to get involved in the Act 250 permitting process at the initial stages of review by a district commission by requiring participation as a prerequisite for an appeal of a district commission decision to the environmental board; and
(4) assure that clear appeal routes exist for acts and decisions of the secretary.
§ 8502. DEFINITIONS
As used in this chapter:
(1) “District commission” means a district commission established under chapter 151 of this title;
(2) “Environmental board” means the environmental board established under section 8503 of this title;
(3) “Person” means any individual, partnership, company, corporation, association, unincorporated association, joint venture, trust, municipality, the state of Vermont or any agency, department or subdivision of the state, any federal agency, or any other legal or commercial entity;
(4) “Person aggrieved” means any person who demonstrates an interest which may be affected by the outcome of the proceeding and who is so situated that the disposition of the proceeding may as a practical matter impair or impede that person’s ability to protect his or her interest.
(5) “Secretary” means the secretary of the agency of natural resources or the secretary’s duly authorized representative. For the purposes of this chapter, “secretary” shall also mean the commissioner of the department of environmental conservation, the commissioner of the department of forests, parks, and recreation, and the commissioner of the department of fish and wildlife, with respect to those statutes that refer to the authority of that commissioner or department.
§ 8503. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
(a) An environmental board is created. The environmental board shall consist of a chair and two members. No member shall be required to be admitted to the practice of law in this state.
(b) The chair shall be nominated, appointed, and confirmed in the manner of a superior judge.
(c) Members of the board other than the chair shall be appointed in accordance with this subsection. Whenever a vacancy occurs, public announcement of the vacancy shall be made. The governor shall submit at least five names of potential nominees to the judicial nominating board for review. The judicial nominating board shall review the candidates in respect to judicial criteria and standards only and shall recommend to the governor those candidates the board considers qualified. The governor shall make the appointment from the list of qualified candidates. The appointment shall be subject to the consent of the senate.
(d) The term of each member shall be six years. Any appointment to fill a vacancy shall be for the unexpired portion of the term vacated. A member wishing to succeed himself or herself in office may seek reappointment under the terms of this section.
(e) Notwithstanding section 2004 of Title 3, or any other provision of law, members of the board may be removed only for cause. When a board member who hears all or a substantial part of a case retires from office before the case is completed, he or she shall remain a member of the board for the purpose of concluding and deciding that case, and signing the findings, orders, decrees, and judgments involved. A retiring chair shall also remain a member for the purpose of certifying questions of law, if appeal is taken.
(f) A case shall be deemed completed when the board enters a final decision even though that decision is appealed to the supreme court and the case remanded by that court to the board. Upon remand, the board then in office may in its discretion consider relevant evidence, including any part of the transcript of testimony in the proceedings prior to appeal.
(g) The chair shall have general charge of the offices and employees of the board.
§ 8504. POWERS OF SINGLE BOARD MEMBER OR OTHER OFFICER
OR EMPLOYEE
(a) One board member or any officer or employee of the board duly appointed by the chair of the board may inquire into and examine any matter within the jurisdiction of the board.
(b) A hearing officer may administer oaths in all cases, so far as the exercise of that power is properly incidental to the performance of his or her duty or that of the board. A hearing officer may hold any hearing in any matter within the jurisdiction of the board to hear. Hearings conducted by a hearing officer shall be in accordance with chapter 25 of Title 3.
(c) A hearing officer shall report his or her findings of fact in writing to the board in the form of a proposal for decision. A copy shall be served upon the parties pursuant to section 811 of Title 3. However, judgment on those findings shall be rendered only by a majority of the board.
(d) At least 12 days prior to a hearing before the board or a hearing officer, the board shall give written notice of the time and place of the hearing to all parties to the case and shall indicate the name and title of the person designated to conduct the hearing.
(e) Upon written request to the board at least five days prior to the hearing by all parties to the case, the chair shall appoint at least a majority of the board to conduct the hearing.
(f) Notwithstanding subsection (c) of this section, the chair may appoint a hearing officer to hear and finally determine any minor permit application or amendment. Upon petition of a party, filed within 30 days of issuance of the hearing officer's decision, or on its own motion, the board may determine that the hearing officer's decision should be treated as a proposal for decision and order as provided in subsection (c) of this section. The board may grant such request for good cause, including but not limited to apparent error of fact, or procedural or substantive law, and may conduct additional evidentiary hearings or hear oral argument from the parties. If such request is not timely made, or is not granted by the board, the decision and order of the hearing officer shall become the final decision and order of the board.
§ 8505. COURT OF RECORD; PROCESS
(a) The board shall have the powers of a court of record in the determination and adjudication of all appeals of all applicable environmental permits provided in section 8512 of this title. It may render judgments, make orders and decrees, and enforce the same by any suitable process issuable by courts in this state.
(b) All processes issued by the board shall state the time and place of return, in those cases where return is to be made to the board. Orders, notices, and other processes issued by the board shall be served personally or by first class mail, except that the board may direct that service be made by registered or certified mail. If the whereabouts of a person are unknown or if the number of respondents is so great that personal service or service by mail is impracticable, service may be made by publication.
(c) Except as provided in subsections (d), (e), and (f) of this section, the board shall give 12 days' notice of all hearings.
(d) A prehearing or procedural conference may be held upon any reasonable notice.
(e) An evidentiary hearing, once commenced upon proper notice, may be continued to a subsequent date upon any reasonable notice.
(f) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section, the board or a single member may grant temporary restraining orders in the manner provided by and subject to limitations prescribed by the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure.
(g) The forms, pleadings, and rules of practice and procedure before the board shall be prescribed by it.
(h) The board shall hear appeals on all decisions of the secretary provided in section 8512 of this title and make its findings of fact and rulings of law. Upon appeal to the supreme court, its findings of fact shall be accepted unless clearly erroneous.
§ 8506. EXPERTS
With the approval of the governor, the board may appoint and employ, at the expense of the state, engineers, accountants, legal counsel, and such number of clerks, stenographers, experts, and temporary employees as it deems necessary in the performance of its duties, and in the investigation of matters within its jurisdiction.
§ 8507. PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS; PERSONNEL
(a)(1) The board may authorize or retain legal counsel, official stenographers, expert witnesses, advisors, temporary employees, and other research services:
(A) to assist the board in any proceeding listed in section 8513 or 8514 of this title; and
(B) to monitor compliance with any formal opinion or order of the board; and
(C) to assist other state agencies that are named parties to the proceeding where the board determines that they are essential to a full consideration of the petition, or for the purpose of monitoring compliance with an order resulting from such a petition; and
(2) The personnel authorized by this section shall be in addition to the regular personnel of the board or other state agencies; and in the case of other state agencies, may be retained only with the approval of the governor and after notice to the applicant. The board or department shall fix the amount of compensation and expenses to be paid such additional personnel.
(b) Persons employed by the state are competent to be designated to act for the same purposes and in lieu of or in conjunction with additional personnel retained under this section. However, when so acting, they shall not receive compensation in addition to their regular pay.
§ 8508. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION
Other departments and agencies of state government shall cooperate with the board and make available to it data and facilities as may be needed to assist the board in carrying out its duties and functions. There shall be established a regular schedule of project review that shall assure that all affected departments and agencies recognize and pursue their respective responsibilities. State employees whose job is to assist applicants in the permitting process established under chapter 151 of this title shall endeavor to assist all applicants regardless of the size and value of the projects involved.
§ 8509. APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF BOARD
(a) This chapter shall govern all appeals of an act or decision of the secretary, excluding enforcement actions under chapters 201 and 211 of this title and rulemaking, under the following authorities:
(1) 10 V.S.A. chapter 23 (air pollution control).
(2) 10 V.S.A. § 922 (aquatic nuisance control grants-in-aid).
(3) 10 V.S.A. chapter 41 (regulation of stream flow).
(4) 10 V.S.A. chapter 43 (dams).
(5) 10 V.S.A. chapter 47 (water pollution control).
(6) 10 V.S.A. chapter 48 (groundwater protection).
(7) 10 V.S.A. chapter 53 (beverage containers).
(8) 10 V.S.A. chapter 55 (aid to municipalities for water supply, pollution abatement and sewer separation).
(9) 10 V.S.A. chapter 56 (public water supply).
(10) 10 V.S.A. chapter 59 (underground liquid storage tanks).
(11) 10 V.S.A. chapter 64 (potable water supply and wastewater permit).
(12) 10 V.S.A. § 2625 (regulation of heavy cutting).
(13) 10 V.S.A. chapter 123 (protection of endangered species).
(14) 10 V.S.A. chapter 159 (waste management).
(15) 29 V.S.A. chapter 11 (management of lakes and ponds).
(b) This chapter shall govern all appeals from an act or decision of a district commission under chapter 151 of this title.
§ 8510. APPEALS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
(a) Any person aggrieved by an act or decision of the secretary or district commission under the provisions of law listed in section 8509 of this title may appeal to the environmental board within 30 days of the date of the act or decision.
(b) Upon filing an appeal from an act or decision of the district commission, the appellant shall notify all parties who had party status as of the end of the district commission proceeding that an appeal is being filed.
(1) No aggrieved person may appeal an act or decision that was made by a district commission unless:
(A) the person is a party pursuant to subdivisions 6085(c)(1)(A) through (D) of this title; or
(B) the person was granted party status by the district commission pursuant to subdivision 6085(c)(1)(E) or (F), participated in the proceedings before the district commission, and retained party status at the end of the district commission proceedings. In addition, the person may only appeal those issues under the criteria with respect to which the person was granted party status.
(2) Notwithstanding subdivision (b)(1) of this section, an aggrieved person may appeal an act or decision of the district commission if the environmental board determines that:
(A) there was a procedural defect which prevented the person from obtaining party status or participating in the proceeding;
(B) the decision being appealed is the granting or denying of party status; or
(C) some other condition exists which would result in manifest injustice if the person’s right to appeal was disallowed.
(c) The filing of an appeal shall not automatically stay the act or decision, except for:
(1) acts or decisions involving stream alteration permits or shoreline encroachment permits issued by the secretary; and
(2) the denial of party status.
(d) The environmental board may grant a stay of any act or decision that has been appealed, upon petition by a party or upon its own motion.
(e) The environmental board may consolidate or coordinate different appeals where those appeals all relate to the same project.
(f) The environmental board shall hold a de novo hearing on those issues which have been appealed, unless the decision of the district commission has been conducted as a recorded hearing pursuant to section 6085a of this title, in which case the review shall be on the record developed in the recorded hearing.
(g) Any appeal of an authorization to discharge under the terms of a general permit shall be limited in scope to whether the permitted activity complies with the terms and conditions of the general permit.
(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section:
(1) the environmental board shall not hear an appeal of a district commission decision when the commission has issued a permit and no preliminary hearing was requested;
(2) a district commission’s decision to grant or deny a motion for a recorded hearing shall not be subject to appeal;
(3) if a district commission issues a partial decision under subsection 6086(b) of this title, any appeal of that decision must be taken within 30 days of the date of that decision.
(h) The secretary may represent the agency in all appeals under this section. If more than one state agency either appeals or seeks to intervene in an appeal under this section, only the attorney general may represent the interests of the state in the appeal.
(i) Prior decisions of the water resources board and waste facilities panel shall be given the same weight and consideration as prior decisions of the environmental board.
§ 8511. RULEMAKING
The board may adopt rules, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 25 of Title 3, in the following areas:
(1) Rules that interpret and carry out the provisions of chapter 151 of this title, including rules that establish criteria under which applications for permits under this chapter may be classified in terms of complexity and significance of impact under the standards of subsection 6086(a) of this title. In accordance with that classification, the rules may:
(A) provide for simplified or less stringent procedures than are otherwise required under sections 6083, 6084, and 6085 of this title; and
(B) provide for the filing of notices instead of applications for the permits that would otherwise be required under section 6081 of this title; and
(C) provide a procedure by which a district commission may authorize a district coordinator to issue a permit that the district commission has determined under board rules is a minor application with no undue adverse impact.
(2) Rules governing surface levels of lakes and ponds, which are public waters of Vermont.
(3) Rules regarding classification of the waters of the state, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. chapter 47.
(4) Rules regarding the establishment of water quality standards, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. chapter 47.
(5) Rules regulating the surface use of public waters, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. chapter 49.
(6) Rules regarding the identification of wetlands which are so significant that they merit protection. Any determination that a particular wetland is significant will result from an evaluation of at least the following functions which a wetland serves:
(A) provides temporary water storage for flood water and storm runoff;
(B) contributes to the quality of surface and groundwater through chemical action;
(C) naturally controls the effects of erosion and runoff, filtering silt and organic matter;
(D) contributes to the viability of fisheries by providing spawning, feeding, and general habitat for freshwater fish;
(E) provides habitat for breeding, feeding, resting, and shelter to both game and nongame species of wildlife;
(F) provides stopover habitat for migratory birds;
(G) provides for hydrophytic vegetation habitat;
(H) provides for threatened and endangered species habitat;
(I) provides valuable resources for education and research in natural sciences;
(J) provides direct and indirect recreational value and substantial economic benefits; and
(K) contributes to the open-space character and overall beauty of the landscape.
(7) Rules regarding petitions, including petitions on the board’s own motion, to designate specific wetlands as significant, when considered under the criteria established in subdivision (6) of this subsection;
(8) Rules protecting wetlands that have been determined under subdivision (6) or (7) of this subsection to be significant, including rules that provide for the issuance or denial of conditional use determinations by the department of environmental conservation; provided, however, that the rules may only protect the values and functions sought to be preserved by the designation. The board shall not adopt rules that restrain agricultural activities without the consent of the commissioner of the department of agriculture, food and markets and shall not adopt rules that restrain silvicultural activities without the consent of the commissioner of the department of forests, parks and recreation.
§ 8512. APPEALS TO THE SUPREME COURT
(a) Any person aggrieved by an act or decision of the environmental board pursuant to this subchapter may appeal to the supreme court within 30 days of the date of the entry of the judgment or order appealed from, provided that the person was a party to the appeal before the environmental board.
(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, an aggrieved person may appeal a decision of the environmental board if the supreme court determines that:
(1) there was a procedural defect which prevented the person from participating in the proceeding;
(2) some other condition exists which would result in manifest injustice if the person’s right to appeal was disallowed.
(c) An objection that has not been raised before the environmental board may not be considered by the supreme court, unless the failure or neglect to raise that objection is excused by the board because of extraordinary circumstances. The findings of the environmental board with respect to questions of fact, if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, shall be conclusive.
(d) The attorney general may represent the state in all appeals under this section.
§ 8013. FEES
(a) All persons filing an appeal to the board from an action of the secretary of natural resources or an appeal to the board from a district environmental commission decision or jurisdictional determination shall pay a fee of $100.00, plus any associated publication costs.
(b) All funds collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the fund created in section 6029 of this title.
§ 8014. ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
(a) The board may allocate the portion of its expenses incurred or authorized by retaining additional personnel for a proceeding or an appeal by the applicant. Upon petition of an applicant to which costs are proposed to be allocated, the board shall review and determine, after opportunity for hearing, the necessity and reasonableness of those costs, having due regard for the size and complexity of the project, and may amend or revise those allocations. Prior to allocating costs, the board shall make a determination of the purpose and use of the funds to be raised under this section, identify the recipient of the funds, provide for allocation of costs among applicants to be assessed, indicate an estimated duration of the proceedings, and estimate the total costs to be imposed. With the approval of the board, estimates may be revised as necessary. From time to time during the progress of the work of the additional personnel, the board shall render to the applicant detailed statements showing the amount of money expended or contracted for in the work of additional personnel and which statements shall be paid by the applicant into the state treasury at the time and in the manner as the board may reasonably direct.
(b) When regular employees of the board are employed in proceedings, the board may also allocate the portion of their costs and expenses to the applicant or applicants involved in the proceedings. The costs of regular employees shall be computed on the basis of working days within the salary period. The manner of assessment and of making payments shall otherwise be as provided for additional personnel in subsection (a) of this section.
(c) All costs allocated pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the fund created in section 6029 of this title.
Second: By striking Sec. 3 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof a new Sec. 3 to read:
Sec. 3. 10 V.S.A. § 6029 is amended to read:
§ 6029. ACT 250 PERMIT FUND
There is
hereby established a special fund to be known as the Act 250 permit fund for
the purposes of implementing the provisions of this chapter and chapter 220
of this title. Revenues to the fund shall be those fees collected in
accordance with rules adopted under 10 V.S.A. §§ 6025(a), 6083(a)(3) and,
6089(a), and 8511 (a)(1), gifts, appropriations, and copying and
distribution fees. The environmental board shall be responsible for the fund
and shall account for revenues and expenditures of the environmental board. At
the commissioner's discretion, the commissioner of finance and management may
anticipate amounts to be collected and may issue warrants based thereon for the
purposes of this section. Disbursements from the fund shall be made through the
annual appropriations process to the environmental board, and to the agency of
natural resources to support those programs within the agency that directly or
indirectly assist in the review of Act 250 applications or appeals of
decisions of the secretary. This fund shall be administered as provided in
subchapter 5 of chapter 7 of Title 32, as a special program fund.
Third: By striking Secs. 4 through 10 and Secs. 12, 14, 16, and 18
Fourth: By striking Sec. 11 in its entirety and inserting a new Sec. 11 to read:
Sec. 11. 10 V.S.A. § 6083a is amended to read:
§ 6083a. FEES
* * *
(d) All
persons filing an appeal, cross appeal or petition from a district
environmental commission decision or jurisdictional determination shall pay a
fee of $100.00, plus publication costs.
* * *
Fifth: In Sec 17, 10 V.S.A. § 6089, by striking the words “or the board”
Sixth: In Sec. 32, 10 V.S.A. § 1004, by striking the words “environmental court” and inserting in lieu thereof: “environmental board”
Seventh: In Sec. 42, 10 V.S.A. § 1272, by striking the section number “6025” and inserting in lieu thereof “8511”
Eighth: By striking Sec. 65 in its entirety and inserting a new Sec. 65 to read:
Sec. 65. REPEAL
10 V.S.A. §§ 903 (creation of water resources board), 904 (records, assistants), 905 (duties; powers), 1270 (appeals from water resources board), 6021 (creation of environmental board), 6025 (rules), 6101 (waste facility panel), 6102 (parties), 6103 (review of provisional certifications), 6103a (review of certifications of need), 6104 (review of agency determinations), 6105 (appeal of district commission decisions), 6106 (consolidation of Act 250 and agency permits), 6107 (appeals to the supreme court), 6108 (transition), and 6024 (intergovernmental cooperation), and 29 V.S.A. § 407 (appeals to supreme court) are repealed.
Ninth: By striking Sec. 66 in its entirety and inserting a new Sec. 66 to read:
Sec. 66. TRANSITION AND IMPLEMENTATION
(a)(1) Continued jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the repeal of their respective enabling authorities, the water resources board, waste facility panel, and the air and solid waste variance board shall continue to exist and have jurisdiction with their preexisting membership to complete their consideration of any action pending before them as of January 1, 2004, except that appeals, petitions, and requests for variances received before January 1, 2004 where the respective boards and panel have not yet initiated proceedings shall be transferred to the environmental board.
(2) Notwithstanding the repeal of its jurisdictional authority under this act, the applicable superior court shall continue to have jurisdiction to complete its consideration of any action pending before it as of January 1, 2004, except that any filing received before January 1, 2004 where the court has not initiated proceedings shall be transferred to the environmental board.
(b) Existing rules. All rules adopted by the water resources board prior to January 1, 2004 shall be deemed to be rules adopted by the environmental board and shall remain in effect until amended or repealed by the environmental board.
(c) Upon enactment of this act, the environmental board shall consist of three members, comprising the chair of the environmental board who shall serve a term of six years, one member appointed by the governor who shall be a current member of the water resources board and who shall serve a term of four years, and one member appointed by the governor who shall serve a term of two years. The remaining membership of the current environmental board and the water resources board may serve as alternates to the board.
Tenth: By striking Sec. 67 in its entirety and inserting a new Sec. 67 to read:
Sec. 67. APPROPRIATIONS AND POSITIONS
(a) The establishment of two (2) new full-time positions – two (2) board member – is authorized for the environmental board.
(b) For fiscal year 2004, two positions which supported the waste facility panel are transferred to the environmental board. For fiscal year 2005, three positions which supported the water resources board are transferred to the enhanced environmental board.
(c) For fiscal year 2004, there is appropriated to the environmental board the amount of $102,666.00 from the general fund to fill the positions described in subsection (a) of this section and provide for other personal service expenses and operating expenses necessary for the operation of the enhanced environmental board described in this act. The enhanced environmental board shall have the authority to transfer funds appropriated waste facilities panel for fiscal year 2004 to the enhanced environmental board upon the effective date of this act.
Speaker Freed back in Chair.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as recommended by Reps. Lippert of Hinesburg, et al? Rep. Deen of Westminster demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as recommended by Reps. Lippert of Hinesburg, et al? was decided in the negative. Yeas, 67. Nays, 76.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson of Woodstock
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Chen of Mendon
Connell of Warren
Corcoran of Bennington
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donahue of Northfield
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Edwards of Brattleboro
Emmons of Springfield
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Grad of Moretown
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hingtgen of Burlington
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hummel of Underhill
Hunt of Essex
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kenyon of Bradford
Keogh of Burlington
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Larson of Burlington
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Miller of Elmore
Nease of Johnson
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Pelham of Calais
Peterson of Williston
Pugh of South Burlington
Reese of Pomfret
Rodgers of Glover
Rusten of Halifax
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Smith of Morristown
Sweaney of Windsor
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Vincent of Waterbury
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Adams of Hartland
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Amidon of Charlotte
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Brown of Walden
Carey of Chester
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
DePoy of Rutland City
Donaghy of Poultney
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Errecart of Shelburne
Flory of Pittsford
Gervais of Enosburg
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kainen of Hartford
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Kirker of Essex
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
Marron of Stowe
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Monti of Barre City
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Nitka of Ludlow
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Perry of Richford
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Robinson of Richmond
Schiavone of Shelburne
Severance of Colchester
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Webster of Randolph
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Young of Orwell
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Metzger of Milton
Molloy of Arlington
Rogers of Castleton
Seibert of Norwich
Starr of Troy
Waite of Pawlet
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? Reps. Larson of Burlington and Tracy of Burlington moved to amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as follows:
In Sec. 15, 10 V.S.A. § 6086(d), by striking the following: In the case of approvals and permits issued by the agency of natural resources with respect to subdivisions (a)(1) – (5) of this section, determinations of the agency shall be dispositive for any issue addressed in the agency permits or approvals under the relevant criteria of subsection (a) of this section in district commission proceedings. And by inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Any approval or permit issued by the agency of natural resources with respect to subdivisions (a)(1) – (5) of this section shall be entitled to a presumption that the application is not detrimental to the public health and welfare with respect to the specific requirement for which it is accepted.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as recommended by Reps. Larson of Burlington and Tracy of Burlington? Rep. Tracy of Burlington demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as recommended by Reps. Larson of Burlington and Tracy of Burlington? was decided in the negative. Yeas, 65. Nays, 75.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Chen of Mendon
Connell of Warren
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Edwards of Brattleboro
Emmons of Springfield
Errecart of Shelburne
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Grad of Moretown
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hingtgen of Burlington
Hummel of Underhill
Hunt of Essex
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kenyon of Bradford
Keogh of Burlington
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Larson of Burlington
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Monti of Barre City
Nease of Johnson
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Pelham of Calais
Perry of Richford
Peterson of Williston
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Pugh of South Burlington
Reese of Pomfret
Rodgers of Glover
Rusten of Halifax
Sharpe of Bristol
Smith of Morristown
Sweaney of Windsor
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Vincent of Waterbury
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Adams of Hartland
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Brown of Walden
Carey of Chester
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Corcoran of Bennington
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
DePoy of Rutland City
Donaghy of Poultney
Donahue of Northfield
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Flory of Pittsford
Gervais of Enosburg
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kainen of Hartford
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Kirker of Essex
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
Marron of Stowe
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Miller of Elmore
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Nitka of Ludlow
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Robinson of Richmond
Schiavone of Shelburne
Shand of Weathersfield
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Webster of Randolph
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Young of Orwell
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Amidon of Charlotte
Anderson of Woodstock
Metzger of Milton
Molloy of Arlington
Rogers of Castleton
Seibert of Norwich
Severance of Colchester
Starr of Troy
Waite of Pawlet
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended? Reps. Maier of Middlebury, Martin of Springfield and Audette of South Burlington moved to amend the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as follows:
First: By striking Sec. 2 in its entirety and inserting a new Sec. 2 to read:
Sec. 2. 3 V.S.A. § 2828 is added to read:
§ 2828. PROJECT SCOPING PROCESS
(a) Applicability. This section shall govern all applications for permits, certifications, or other authorizations issued by the department of environmental conservation, except for permit renewals, and wastewater and water supply permits for single family homes located on their own lots, and except for professional licenses. It also shall govern applications for permits under chapter 151 of Title 10.
(b) Determining project scope. The department of environmental conservation and, if appropriate, the district coordinator shall prepare a project review sheet based on information submitted by the applicant. The project review sheet shall indicate:
(1) a brief description of the project and all permits necessary for the project known at the outset of the scoping process;
(2) whether a land use permit is required by chapter 151 of Title 10; and
(3) a project identification number assigned by the secretary, for use on all applications, notices, permits, and decisions issued by the secretary.
(c) Project review sheet. The project review sheet shall be prepared based on the information submitted by the project applicant. If, based on supplemental information, or for other good cause, the secretary determines that a project will require other permits or the district coordinator determines that a land use permit under chapter 151 of Title 10 is required, notwithstanding the fact that the permit requirement did not appear on the initial project review sheet, the project review sheet shall be amended. Any failure by the applicant, secretary, or a district coordinator to identify on the project review sheet a required permit or authorization issued by the secretary, or a land use permit issued under chapter 151 of Title 10, shall not constitute a waiver of jurisdiction.
(d) Notice of project. Upon completion of the project review sheet, the secretary or district coordinator shall send a copy of the project review sheet by first class mail, postage prepaid, at least to each of the following: the owner of the land where the project is located if the applicant is not the owner; the municipality in which the project is located; the municipal and regional planning commissions for any municipality in which the project is located; any adjacent Vermont municipality and its municipal and regional planning commissions; any state agency identified on the project scoping sheet as being directly affected by the project; and all adjoining landowners.
(e) Scheduling of project scoping meeting. If requested by a person within 15 days of the date of mailing of the project review sheet, the secretary, shall schedule a project scoping meeting. If no department of environmental conservation permit, certification or other authorization is required, the meeting shall be scheduled by the district coordinator.
(f) Notice of project scoping meeting. The secretary or district commissioner shall notice any project scoping meeting, at least 30 days prior to the date of the meeting, by sending a copy of the notice to the persons required to receive the project review sheet under subsection (c) of this section. This notice shall be sent by first class mail, postage prepaid. The applicant shall assure that this notice is published in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the proposed project.
(g) Project scoping meeting. The following persons shall be present at the scoping meeting: the applicant or a representative of the applicant; the secretary or the secretary’s designee; the district coordinator, if the proposed project will require a land use permit under chapter 151 of Title 10; and a representative of a local permitting authority or a member of the selectboard of the town in which the project is located, if no local permitting authority exists. At the meeting, the applicant or a representative of the applicant shall present a description of the proposed project, and be available for questions from the public concerning the proposed project. The purpose of the meeting shall be to provide public information and increase notice about the project, allow discussion of the proposed project, and identify potential issues at the beginning of the project review process. The applicant shall provide copies of the project review sheet to persons attending the meeting.
(h) Report. Following the project scoping meeting, the secretary shall prepare a scoping report documenting the proceedings. The secretary shall distribute the report to persons who requested a copy at the meeting and to any person who received notice under this section. The report shall become a permanent part of the file for the project.
Second: By adding a Sec. 67a to read:
Sec. 67a. APPROPRIATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT SPECIALIST
The sum of $130,000.00 is appropriated above the amount in the approved budget for the department of environmental conservation to the agency of natural resources in fiscal year 2004 from the general fund. The agency is authorized one new full‑time development permit specialist and one new full-time permit manager.
Pending the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as recommended by Reps. Maier of Middlebury, et al? Rep. Symington of Jericho demanded the Yeas and Nays, which demand was sustained by the Constitutional number. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll and the question, Shall the House amend the bill as recommended by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, as recommended by Reps. Maier of Middlebury, et al? was decided in the negative. Yeas, 67. Nays 74.
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson of Woodstock
Aswad of Burlington
Atkins of Winooski
Audette of South Burlington
Bohi of Hartford
Botzow of Pownal
Brooks of Montpelier
Chen of Mendon
Connell of Warren
Corcoran of Bennington
Cross of Winooski
Dakin of Colchester
Darrow of Dummerston
Deen of Westminster
Donahue of Northfield
Donovan of Burlington
Dostis of Waterbury
Edwards of Brattleboro
Emmons of Springfield
Fallar of Tinmouth
Fisher of Lincoln
French of Randolph
Gervais of Enosburg
Grad of Moretown
Head of South Burlington
Heath of Westford
Hingtgen of Burlington
Hummel of Underhill
Hunt of Essex
Jewett of Ripton
Johnson of South Hero
Keenan of St. Albans City
Kenyon of Bradford
Keogh of Burlington
Kiss of Burlington
Kitzmiller of Montpelier
Klein of East Montpelier
Larson of Burlington
Lippert of Hinesburg
Maier of Middlebury
Marek of Newfane
Martin of Springfield
Masland of Thetford
McCullough of Williston
McLaughlin of Royalton
Milkey of Brattleboro
Miller of Shaftsbury
Nease of Johnson
Nuovo of Middlebury
Obuchowski of Rockingham
Partridge of Windham
Pelham of Calais
Perry of Richford
Pillsbury of Brattleboro
Pugh of South Burlington
Reese of Pomfret
Rodgers of Glover
Rusten of Halifax
Shand of Weathersfield
Sharpe of Bristol
Smith of Morristown
Sweaney of Windsor
Symington of Jericho
Tracy of Burlington
Trombley of Grand Isle
Vincent of Waterbury
Zuckerman of Burlington
Those who voted in the negative are:
Adams of Hartland
Allaire of Rutland City
Allard of St. Albans Town
Bailey of Hyde Park
Baker of West Rutland
Bartlett of Dover
Bolduc of Barton
Bostic of St. Johnsbury
Branagan of Georgia
Brennan of Colchester
Brown of Walden
Carey of Chester
Clark of St. Johnsbury
Clark of Vergennes
Crawford of Burke
Crowley of West Rutland
DePoy of Rutland City
Donaghy of Poultney
Duffy of Rutland City
Dunsmore of Georgia
Endres of Milton
Errecart of Shelburne
Flory of Pittsford
Gray of Barre Town
Haas of Rutland City
Hall of Newport City
Helm of Castleton
Houston of Ferrisburgh
Howrigan of Fairfield
Hube of Londonderry
Hudson of Lyndon
Johnson of Canaan
Kainen of Hartford
Kennedy of Chelsea
Ketchum of Bethel
Kilmartin of Newport City
Kirker of Essex
Koch of Barre Town
Krawczyk, A. of Bennington
Krawczyk, J. of Bennington
Larocque of Barnet
Larrabee of Danville
LaVoie of Swanton
Livingston of Manchester
Marron of Stowe
Mazur of South Burlington
McAllister of Highgate
Miller of Elmore
Morrissey of Bennington
Myers of Essex
Nitka of Ludlow
O'Donnell of Vernon
Otterman of Topsham
Parent of St. Albans City
Peaslee of Guildhall
Peterson of Williston
Robinson of Richmond
Schiavone of Shelburne
Severance of Colchester
Shaw of Derby
Sheltra of Derby
Smith of New Haven
Sunderland of Rutland Town
Sweeney of Colchester
Sweetser of Essex
Towne of Berlin
Valliere of Barre City
Webster of Randolph
Westman of Cambridge
Winters of Swanton
Winters of Williamstown
Wood of Brandon
Wright of Burlington
Young of Orwell
Those members absent with leave of the House and not voting are:
Amidon of Charlotte
Metzger of Milton
Molloy of Arlington
Monti of Barre City
Rogers of Castleton
Seibert of Norwich
Starr of Troy
Waite of Pawlet
Thereupon, the recommendation of amendment offered by the committee on Natural Resources and Energy, as amended, was agreed to and third reading ordered.
House Bill Introduced
H. 476
Reps. Houston of Ferrisburgh, Symington of Jericho, Hube of Londonderry, Partridge of Windham, Towne of Berlin, Starr of Troy, Westman of Cambridge and Heath of Westford introduced a bill, entitled
An act relating to an agricultural loan guarantee program and a farm operating loan program;
Which was read the first time and referred to the committee on Agriculture.
Remarks Journalized
On motion of Rep. LaVoie of Swanton, the following remarks by Rep. Livingston of Manchester were ordered printed in the Journal:
“Mr. Speaker:
April 6:
OK, here's my situation. I'm sitting in a dirt clearing by the side of the road. We're about 10 miles from Baghdad. There's some artillery set up to my left which opens up shooting every 20 minutes or so. There's a family across the street with seven kids at a makeshift bus stop trying to get a ride, but none of the cars going past will stop. A flock of sheep just walked past. I can hear jets overhead periodically, but it's too hazy today to see them. There are two shot-up Iraqi trucks in the trees next to me. I have on my chemical suit, flack jacket, pistol, and grenades. My helmet is sitting next to me. I'm very sweaty and dirty, and the gnats keep flying into my ears. I'm sitting in my foldout chair writing to you on a Dell laptop computer while drinking a French Vanilla Cappuccino from an MRE [meal-ready-to-eat]. Talk about surreal!
April 8: ....We're finally back to wearing our desert cammies [camoflage uniforms]. It has been assessed that the chemical threat at this point is basically gone. It's much more comfortable and cooler in cammies, but the charcoal lining of the chemical suits did do a good job of absorbing everybody's smell. Now we'll have to try to find more time to clean up, or just stink more.
We're seeing one clear sign that the regime is done: the locals are looting the upscale stores. At home, looting usually seems to be people stealing stereos, TVs, and microwaves. Here, it's farm equipment: Bobcat tractors, generators, combines, and trucks. The reason it isn't so bad that they're stealing is because the wealth in this country is so centralized in the Ba'ath regime it's ridiculous. Having seen the entire southern part of Iraq up to Baghdad, I can tell you there's no reason for this country to have poverty or starvation. It's a rich country. Obviously, there's tons of oil, but it's also an incredibly fertile country with lots of sun and water. Iraq alone should be able to feed the entire Middle East. But it doesn't happen.
The Ba'ath party and it's cronies have held all the power and wealth for themselves. As the party is crumbling, the stealing is the first sign of the redistribution of wealth that will ultimately make this country a productive place and maybe even the jewel of the Middle East.
We stopped some of the guys last night who were stealing Bobcats to talk to them a little bit. The first guy tried to tell us they worked for the company and were just moving the tractors. The next was like a little kid and hung his head and smiled and sheepishly said, "Yeah, we're stealing them" in Arabic. We talked with them for a while. They showed us where they had been tortured - cut and burned- by Ba'ath party officials, and then they let us borrow the tractors for a little while to help dig in our fighting positions.Most people on the street drive by honking, smiling, cheering, and waving. This thing is done, now we just have to convince some of the diehards.
April 8, (late)...We're in the city now, that's all I can say about that. Driving into the city today we saw some nasty, nasty stuff. Some of the worst "war-like" things we've seen. But we all got in safely and we're setup and running. We drove through a little town that was the worst scene of poverty, squalor, sewage, trash, and stench I've ever seen in my life. It has nothing to do with the war, it's just poverty. As always, seeing the kids kills me.
Love to everyone,
Cordell
(CAPT. R. Cordell Bennigson, USMC)”
Message from the Senate No. 45
A message was received from the Senate by Mr. Marshall, its Assistant Secretary, as follows:
Mr. Speaker:
I am directed to inform the House that the Senate has on its part passed Senate bill of the following title:
S. 178. An act relating to job creation and development.
In the passage of which the concurrence of the House is requested.
The Senate has on its part adopted a joint resolution of the following title:
J.R.S. 28. Joint resolution relating to weekend adjournment.
In the adoption of which the concurrence of the House is requested.
Adjournment
At six o’clock and fifteen minutes in the evening, on motion of Rep. Houston of Ferrisburgh, the House adjourned until tomorrow at nine o’clock and thirty minutes in the forenoon.